John:
But that is not how RCI points are structured. They are result of individual leases from deed hplders.
That is the more common sales approach used but not the only model they allow.
John:
But that is not how RCI points are structured. They are result of individual leases from deed hplders.
I think if we got everyone on this forum to put their Timeshares into that trust we could have a VERY impressive collection
IF you do a week "conversion" that is correct. That is not what I'm saying helps solve the problem. I'm talking about the deeds staying in a trust - maybe even one under Association control - so no deeds are sold to new buyers. Instead you get a RTU or lease for XX years that give you XX points - backed by those Trust weeks. Thus the fee per point is the amount you pay. Get less pay less - take more & pay more. But always the same price per point. It can & does work that way.
And it doesn't have to be costly either. Remember the true cost to join RCI Points is $199. Above that is profit for the sller. If the Associations are in it to get fees & move inventory then holding the buy in very low is yet another plus to the process.
What specifically would be the mechanism for handling delinquent owners?
So the answer is for us to creat a trust and let anyone and everyone deed their weeks into it.. Prime weeks can be deeded for free, pink weeks a small fee, white weeks a larger fee and the blue weeks a still larger fee
These fees will be used to buy more weeks for the trust so that the total inventory will be balanced, ie an equal number of red, pink, white and blue weeks.. or more importantly since we are going to deposit everything to RCI, we want a reasonable average cost per TPU...
Then the entire mess deposited to RCI to obtain a big pile of TPU
Each tpu will have a cost basis equal to the total mf of all the weeks in the trust divided by the total number of tpu ....Im betting it comes out to about $25 or less per TPU
Then we assign the tpu to whomever wants them on a onetime use basis at their calculated value plus something to provide income to the trust (and of course the trustee)
If we can charge $30/tpu those sale weeks on RCI will cost $150 plus the exchange fee or $350...a typical 12 TPU week will cost $560 or you can stay at the Manhatten club for $285 per night
Aren't what you guys are talking about with Trusts basically vacation clubs? You pay a membership fee(or give in a week) to have access to all the weeks available in the trust?
What do prime week owners have to gain? Would they have a right to more TPU's and a lower cost? Why convert all to TPUs? Internal "exchanges" would work better.
Please re-read, we were talking about mandating all intervals (even the prime red ones) into the points system.
At the very least there would need to be tremendous pressure for the prime interval owners to "play along" with the creation or expansion of the points structure.
I still do not follow. If you think prime week owners will give up their rights to their week to help out the mud week owners you are wasting your time. Remember that prime week owners paid a lot more for their weeks to the developer than the mud week owners did.
Ride:
How many prime oceanfront units exist within driving distance < 250 miles of us?
Ride:
How many prime oceanfront units exist within driving distance < 250 miles of us? Why should I give up mine to spend a whole day driving to the TS.
I still do not follow. If you think prime week owners will give up their rights to their week to help out the mud week owners you are wasting your time. Remember that prime week owners paid a lot more for their weeks to the developer than the mud week owners did.
400,000........
I still do not follow. If you think prime week owners will give up their rights to their week to help out the mud week owners you are wasting your time. Remember that prime week owners paid a lot more for their weeks to the developer than the mud week owners did.
3) If the trust is loaded with lame ducks, and it will be, the special assessments could topple the trust.
2) With floating weeks timeshares ex Massanutten 1-52, Sheraton Broadway Plantation 9-43, who is going to ensure timely deposits to ensure maximum TPU? Employees of the trust? They are not free. How motivated will these employees be make sure that the trust gets the biggest bang for the buck?
This is a good question that i'm not sure how will end up working out...Heck, we have dozens of members on Tug that had previously donated their time to serve on a HOA/POA/BOD, maybe for a membership to the Trust/Vacation Club, they will be willing to donate time to us, Maybe one member per system calling in 30-50 reservations at a time? Can you make that many reservations over one phone call with systems like Sheraton when all the deeds are in the same trust/vacation club name?
Sure I can! It would go something like this:
2013
Me: Hello SBP I have just wired you $60K for usage on 50 SBP weeks. Gimme 10 units each for weeks 26, 27, 28, 29, 30.
System: Ummm.. let me see what I have.. OK.. done
2014
Me: Hello SBP I have just wired you $66K for usage on 50 SBP weeks. Gimme 10 units each for weeks 26, 27, 28, 29, 30.
System: Sorry, no more than 5 summer weeks per owner.
Game over.