• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 31st anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

Wyndham is closing a handful of legacy resorts - dedicated chart/tracker located in the first post for this unfolding set of events

Not all of them no - AFAIK resale owners still do not have access to the MVC inventory at Atlanta for example, only retail owners do. I'd expect the SI resorts that will be brand new to adhere to this same model moving forward, resale owners will only receive the five month access window if the occupancy rates fall under a certain threshold.
This is correct. I have both and tried to book with resale but could not. I had no trouble booking with developer.
 
Yes, and as I said previously, by removing a subset of the lower points value older resorts from the system, what does that motivate owners to do? Buy more points to fund future vacations. If the overall points/day increases by removing older resorts, owners will need to buy more points to spend the same net amount of vacation days per year.
It can be inferred that owners are already doing this of their own accord. There is so relatively little interest in the "old, cheap" resorts that Wyndham controls enough voting power to terminate some of these resorts. Meanwhile, the "expensive" resorts, such as Hawaii and Clearwater for example, are seeing the demand.
 
However...aren't places like Bentley Brook really subsidizing places like Hawaii (and other high point per booking resorts). It really is an inverse relationship:
Bentley Brook: uses low amount of points but has high maintenance fees
Hawaii: uses lots of points to book but has low maintenance fees
It's really masking, quite well, the true issue - that your places like Bentley Brook are being booked at bargain prices, at the expense of the BB owners (and enjoyment of Bali Hai, etc)?
I am not sure this is the case. As an "underutilized" resort (by owners), it is EASY for any Bentley Brook owner to book a reservation there.

If it is true that resorts such as BB are "subsidizing" higher maintenance fee resorts such as Hawaii, that would be just one more reason to terminate resorts such as BB. They are not pulling their weight.
 
I am not sure this is the case. As an "underutilized" resort (by owners), it is EASY for any Bentley Brook owner to book a reservation there.

If it is true that resorts such as BB are "subsidizing" higher maintenance fee resorts such as Hawaii, that would be just one more reason to terminate resorts such as BB. They are not pulling their weight.
I'm not sure Bentley Brook is subsidizing anything. Bentley Brook gets medium hot temperatures in the summer and cold temperatures in the New England winter, so it's HVAC system is always running. It also needs snow removal. They have been very conscientious about keeping the place up, including revamping the rooms in one wing several years ago and undergoing a gigantic renovation in the main building this year. I've driven by several times and they had all kinds of shipping containers in the parking lot filled with new new furnishings for the rooms.

Rumor has it that BB is for sale for $25 million. One potential buyer is the group that operates the ski slope and the hotel there. Nice to see that my fees have gone to fixing up the place for the new owners.
 
They vote with their feet - meaning a good subset of these resorts have low owner occupancy - so yes - they care about staying in older resorts that don't deliver the same quality as the newer/larger resorts in better areas. As I've repeatedly stated, Wyndham is basing these decisions on a variety of factors, including the fact that a majority of owners have indicated they don't particularly like staying at these older resorts that aren't kept up as well as some of the newer/larger tourist related locations. TUG does not represent the majority of Wyndham timeshare ownership viewpoints, as I've also repeatedly indicated over many years. TUG represents timeshare "superusers" for the most part, which are by definition very much the minority of the ownership base.

Yes, but without exception every one of the resorts you just listed are either in major metro areas where tourism is popular, and there's a ton of activities surrounding the resort itself. You're making my point here.

Since the ownership base pays for those MFs via the local HOAs at each resort, I'd argue it's both/and. It's both a problem for Wyndham, and for the owners that hold contracts at these locations.

The resistance to change on the TUG forums is palpable. Let's ask it this way, what would everyone prefer Wyndham do to remove older less popular resorts with low owner occupancy? Apart from 100% transparency, which we all know isn't legally permissible for various reasons especially in advance of HOA votes? Is the answer simply not to do so? If so, that's burying you head in the sand and practicing resistance to change over the long term, which is never a sound business plan. So let's hear your proposals as to how to remove older less popular resorts with low owner occupancy without upsetting at least a minority of the ownership base in the process. No matter what Wyndham does, they cannot make everyone happy. I for one am not going to demonize Wyndham for at least trying to manage change and innovate in the timeshare space. If I don't like where this is all going, I can always use other timeshare systems instead, or exchanges, for my vacations. I can even exit via CE if needed, if I'm really unhappy with their path forward. There are options for everyone involved here in other words.

How is investing alongside SI embezzlement exactly? Be specific. Is this any different from Wyndham investing with Margaritaville to produce a subset of MVC resorts? Do you really think a company as large as Wyndham, with it's own army of lawyers, isn't going to ensure they are doing this properly?
I'm not sure I get the point about owner occupancy. As long as a timeshare achieves high occupancy rates, what does it matter if it's owners or RCI exchangers?

Second, some timeshares being closed outstanding occupancy rates. Bentley Brook is one of them. It's located in Western Massachusetts, in the Berkshires. It is on a ski slope and benefits from that during the winter. During the summer, the Berkshires are famous as the home of the Boston, Philharmonic, Jacob's Pillow dance center, and professional theater companies. There is also hiking (we are just off the Appalachian trail near the highest mountain in Massachusetts), fishing, boating, and all the other outdoor stuff you could want. There's fall foliage season and it is beautiful in spring. This place is always full and it is closing.
 
I'm not sure Bentley Brook is subsidizing anything.
I agree, hence my post, "I am not sure this [places like Bentley Brook really subsidizing places like Hawaii] [places like Bentley Brook are being booked at bargain prices, at the expense of the BB owners] is the case."

Rumor has it that BB is for sale for $25 million. One potential buyer is the group that operates the ski slope and the hotel there. Nice to see that my fees have gone to fixing up the place for the new owners.
There is obviously a larger buyers market for a turnkey operation than there is for a fixer-upper resort. If the resort sells for $25M relatively soon versus languishing on the market for a year or two and not finding a buyer at $10M as a fixer-upper, then it was money well spent. Plus, Wyndham remodels dozens of resorts each year. It only make sense they would leverage that experience and bulk buying power to assist the HOA in the remodel (if that is what happened).
 
I look at it much differenty than you. With my purhcase on the resale market, I paid just about $1500 including all costs. I have about 500k points, and I pay about $7.50/1000 in MFs. I am traveling to New Orleans in Mardi Gras for 112k points in a 1BR for 5 nights. That's $840, or $168/night and there is no extra taxes or fees. There is zero way I could get a hotel room, let alone a 1 BR for that price during Mardi Gras.

If you know how to use your ownership, I am a firm believer that you will come out ahead every time.
By the way, I know my post here was like a week old, and there's probably a lot of conversation after that, but I am just catching up. A small 175 square foot hotel room for these date (non-refundable) is $1538 total ad the Omni Hotel in the French Quarter, about $100 less than double the cost of Wyndham. A one bedroom suite at the same hotel, which I doubt has a full kitchen and free laundry faciltiies in the hotel, like the Wyndham has, is $4099, also non refundable. Boy am I glad I own Wyndham, really understand the system, and know how to get great value from my ownership, It's not the product i have a problem with.
 
I own Fairfield Bay and haven’t received any correspondence yet from the HOA or Wyndham. Has any other owner of Fairfield Bay been contacted?
 
Is it cheaper for Wyndham to remove their name from these resorts; then to bring them up to current Wyndham standards ?
 
I just spoke with someone from Customer Service at Wyndham Ocean Ridge (Edisto Beach). They confirmed that two sections at WYM Ocean Ridge (Sea Oaks and Sea Palms) will transition out of WYM, but all other sections at Ocean Ridge will remain OPEN under WYM.
 
Is it cheaper for Wyndham to remove their name from these resorts; then to bring them up to current Wyndham standards ?
Well, sure - they're selling them so they're likely making money vs spending money. Also, it's not just that they'd have to renovate the units - which they've done and do somewhat regularly - it's the other amenities that may be difficult to add in any reasonable way. Adding say a pool section, adding a sauna / steam room / etc. Adding arcades, movie theaters, stores, whatever Wyndham thinks is desirable in the other resorts might be a big deal. Now I don't know what it is Wyndham thinks is desirable of course - I'm just guessing above. For at least some like Fairfield Glade it's probably location, so of course you can't move a resort. I think the main one of confusion for TUGgers is Bently Brook - the others make more sense in being old resorts that are also in less desirable locations and making the resort itself the destination is ... probably never something Wyndham really does that I can think of, and would be incredibly expensive.
 
View attachment 112930

** IMPORTANT **

Official Wyndham Statement as of 7-15-2025:
https://clubwyndham.wyndhamdestinations.com/us/en/resorts/resort-news/2025/important-resorts-update

Please note with regard to any official public statement from Wyndham, that they must follow a plethora of rules and regulations regarding official/legal notifications for the impacted HOAs/resorts, including the Club Wyndham bylaws, the HOA bylaws, and state/county/township/local laws, etc., all of which are different for each impacted resort. It is a complex process. Those who are expressing frustration as to why Wyndham has not yet disclosed anything officially, please recognize that because there are explicit disclosure laws and processes that must be followed. Wyndham will likely provide a more detailed official statement after all required notifications have been completed. The next notification may or may not provide an explicit list of impacted resorts.

Below is a table we have built to track both CONFIRMED and POSSIBLE impacted resorts. Please note ANY resort marked as "NO" in the CONFIRMED column is merely POSSIBLE, but we have NO confirmation either way, just rumors at this time. Resorts listed as "PARTIAL" indicate we have backchannel information that is deemed reliable yet needs to be further confirmed via an official HOA BOD communication. The DISPOSITION column indicates how the resort is reportedly going to be handled after it is removed from the Club Wyndham system effective 12/31/2025. The values for this column are: TBD (To-Be-Determined), COMPLETE EXIT - meaning Wyndham owns the entirety of the resort and a complete exit is planned - and Wyndham is likely selling off the entire resort), WYNDHAM EXIT - meaning Wyndham does not own the entire resort, but it is exiting this resort for it's part - likely via a sale of the real estate owned. CONSOLIDATION - Wyndham is downsizing the amount of inventory at the resort - likely via eliminating one of multiple HOAs - but is not exiting the resort in entirety.

For comparison's sake, the CWA MFs are $8.13/k. Given the Wyndham missive indicates a CWA points swap will be offered, please use this as a measuring stick against the RESORT UDI MF documented below for the impacted resort, or if you own a converted fixed week, use your specific converted weeks contract $/k rate for comparison.

We will update this chart when we receive additional information over the coming days and weeks:


#RESORT NAMECONFIRMED?CONFIRMATION SOURCEDISPOSITIONRESORT CLOSURE DATERESORT UDI MFLEGACY RESORT?CWA RESORT?NOTES
1Club Wyndham Fairfield Glade (TN)YES TBD12/31/2025$6.34/kYESYESConfirmed via a public newspaper article: https://www.crossville-chronicle.co...cle_a748ba2a-1f72-476e-b0a3-be55354548e0.html
2Club Wyndham Orlando International (FL)YESOfficial HOA BOD vote on chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings scheduled for 8/5/2025 in preparation for resort sale.COMPLETE EXIT - RESORT SALE12/31/2025$7.16/k (2024)YESYES
3Club Wyndham Patriot's Place (VA)PARTIALReliable backchannel source with firsthand knowledge from the local resort - awaiting official public confirmationTBD12/31/2025~9.02/k (estimated)YESYES
4Club Wyndham Bentley Brook (MA)PARTIALReliable backchannel source with firsthand knowledge from the local resort - awaiting official public confirmation12/31/2025$9.10/kYESNO
5Club Wyndham Overlook (RI)PARTIALReliable backchannel source with firsthand knowledge from Wyndham corporate - awaiting official public confirmationTBD12/31/2025TBDYESYES
6Club Wyndham Bay Voyage (RI)PARTIALReliable backchannel source with firsthand knowledge from Wyndham corporate - awaiting official public confirmationTBD12/31/2025TBDYESYES
7Club Wyndham Shawnee (PA)PARTIALReliable backchannel source with firsthand knowledge from Wyndham corporate - awaiting official public confirmationWYNDHAM EXIT12/31/2025Varies by HOAYESYESIt is possible this will be a downsize and not entirely removed - however details are still pending
8Club Wyndham Skyline Tower (NJ)PARTIALReliable backchannel source with firsthand knowledge from the local resort - awaiting official public confirmationTBD12/31/2025$7.65/k (2024)YESYES
9Club Wyndham Fairfield Bay (AR)PARTIALReliable backchannel source with firsthand knowledge from the local resort - awaiting official public confirmationTBD12/31/2025$9.88/kYESYES
11Club Wyndham Branson at the FallsPARTIALReliable backchannel source with firsthand knowledge from Wyndham corporate - awaiting official public confirmationCONSOLIDATION12/31/2025TBDYESYESThis is a consolidation - one of the three HOAs within Branson is being impacted - only the Falls HOA specifically.
12Club Wyndham Star Island (FL)PARTIALReliable backchannel source with firsthand knowledge from Wyndham corporate - awaiting official public confirmationCONSOLIDATION12/31/2025~$9.02/k (estimated)YESYES
14Club Wyndham Ocean Ridge (Edisto) (SC)PARTIALReliable backchannel source with firsthand knowledge from Wyndham corporate - awaiting official public confirmationCONSOLIDATION12/31/2025Varies by phase/HOAYESYESA subset of the HOAs is rumored to be impacted
15Club Wyndham Fairfield Mountains (NC)PARTIALReliable backchannel source with firsthand knowledge from the local resort - awaiting official public confirmationWYNDHAM EXIT12/31/2025TBDYESYESSpeculative feedback regarding negotiations that Capital Vacations may take over the Wyndham sections.

What does "Legacy Resort" mean? It means this resort was one of the original Fairfield resorts from way back when. Below are screenshots of the legacy resorts from a very old Fairfield members directory from way back when. Please note we are NOT saying all of the resorts in the below screenshots are part of this action, we're only tracking whether or not the resorts in the table above are or are not part of this category as some TUGGERs are curious about this data point.

View attachment 113034

View attachment 113035
With respect to the "Fairfield Pagosa" listing... There are about 6 or 7 different HOAs in Pagosa Springs, all managed (now) by Wyndham. One, whose name escapes me, was closed by membership vote in 2024, and delisted from the Wyndham Pagosa group of resorts. This ~20 unit property is now for sale as individual, wholly-owned condos. I took a close exterior look at the place in June, 2025. Looks like there is about $200-$300k of deferred exterior maintenance for the common property, and, from what I could see through windows, about $40-$60k of interior renovations that will be required of each new owner. So, the Orlando example isn't necessarily the very first closure of a Wyndham-managed proeprty.
 
I just spoke with someone from Customer Service at Wyndham Ocean Ridge (Edisto Beach). They confirmed that two sections at WYM Ocean Ridge (Sea Oaks and Sea Palms) will transition out of WYM, but all other sections at Ocean Ridge will remain OPEN under WYM.

Good info - we know how the specific HOAs impacted for the consolidation. Thanks for sharing this info!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
With respect to the "Fairfield Pagosa" listing... There are about 6 or 7 different HOAs in Pagosa Springs, all managed (now) by Wyndham. One, whose name escapes me, was closed by membership vote in 2024, and delisted from the Wyndham Pagosa group of resorts. This ~20 unit property is now for sale as individual, wholly-owned condos. I took a close exterior look at the place in June, 2025. Looks like there is about $200-$300k of deferred exterior maintenance for the common property, and, from what I could see through windows, about $40-$60k of interior renovations that will be required of each new owner. So, the Orlando example isn't necessarily the very first closure of a Wyndham-managed proeprty.

There is no Fairfield Pagosa listed on our chart at present. Are you referring to a resort that’s actually on our tracking list?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Is it cheaper for Wyndham to remove their name from these resorts; then to bring them up to current Wyndham standards ?

That's a red herring, most of these resorts are ALREADY at Wyndham standards. MANY have been renovated recently, paid for by current (WYN) owners MF.

It's quite outrageous that owners are in fact subsidizing remodeling in locations being sold. Pump and dump at it's finest.

Then take the proceeds and set up a new system which existing owners paid for, but can't use. There's some real cognitive disonnance here if you can't see this.
 
FYI, some people are reporting on facebook that some of the known affected resorts can no longer be booked after 12/31, I did not try to verify this.

I think it's good that Wyndham finally did this, to limit issues later.
 
FYI, some people are reporting on facebook that some of the known affected resorts can no longer be booked after 12/31, I did not try to verify this.

I think it's good that Wyndham finally did this, to limit issues later.
I’ve seen lots of reports that people still can or have recently booked those resorts. The only post to the contrary is I think a misinterpretation of the “Unable to book” message - that’s just a glitch that affects some owners periodically (see the glitchy website thread), unrelated to the closures. I haven’t seen anyone post a blocked-out calendar, for instance.
 
I’ve seen lots of reports that people still can or have recently booked those resorts. The only post to the contrary is I think a misinterpretation of the “Unable to book” message - that’s just a glitch that affects some owners periodically (see the glitchy website thread), unrelated to the closures. I haven’t seen anyone post a blocked-out calendar, for instance.

The calendars will not be blocked off until the HOA votes have passed certain thresholds. So for example, rumor is that the Orlando International bankruptcy vote that was held on or around 8/5 succeeded, so while the bankruptcy route has been approved, the timing is still in question along with 2026 operations - which will require another HOA vote that has not yet transpired. Therefore this resort hasn’t been blocked out for 2026 as yet - and won’t be until the HOA processes determine the timelines definitively.

For those who keep asking why it’s taking so long for a published list from Wyndham, or why Wyndham has not yet blocked out 2026 availabilities via the online system, each resort has different bylaws and some resorts may require multiple votes on different topics before Wyndham and the HOA determine how to proceed. There can be any number of votes, bylaws and rules that prevent public announcements. It’s not as simple as many would like to believe.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
For any of these resorts, though, Wyndham is the owner of some number of those weeks already. What will be happening to Wyndham's owned weeks in this scenario, and so what's the difference if they add to that number by swapping some owners for CWA first?
We don't really know what will happen with weeks at these resorts that are owned by CWA. If they swap those weeks for CWA, then it just adds to weeks in CWA at those resorts. Why would Wyndham take on that risk. They are trying to unload these resorts due to high maintenance fees. Until and unless they can find someone willing to buy all those CWA weeks, I doubt they will add any more to CWA.
 
I agree, hence my post, "I am not sure this [places like Bentley Brook really subsidizing places like Hawaii] [places like Bentley Brook are being booked at bargain prices, at the expense of the BB owners] is the case."


There is obviously a larger buyers market for a turnkey operation than there is for a fixer-upper resort. If the resort sells for $25M relatively soon versus languishing on the market for a year or two and not finding a buyer at $10M as a fixer-upper, then it was money well spent. Plus, Wyndham remodels dozens of resorts each year. It only make sense they would leverage that experience and bulk buying power to assist the HOA in the remodel (if that is what happened).

Bento Brook has recently renovated all their units
 
That's a red herring, most of these resorts are ALREADY at Wyndham standards. MANY have been renovated recently, paid for by current (WYN) owners MF.

It's quite outrageous that owners are in fact subsidizing remodeling in locations being sold. Pump and dump at it's finest.

Then take the proceeds and set up a new system which existing owners paid for, but can't use. There's some real cognitive disonnance here if you can't see this.
considering Wyndham probably owns at least 60 percent of the rooms, Wyndham is paying maint. just like every other owner. So for them to continue renovations despite expecting to sell, must mean it is a worthwhile investment. Think of it like redoing your kitchen to make it more saleable.
 
considering Wyndham probably owns at least 60 percent of the rooms, Wyndham is paying maint. just like every other owner. So for them to continue renovations despite expecting to sell, must mean it is a worthwhile investment. Think of it like redoing your kitchen to make it more saleable.

Wyndham has the deeds but if they are in the cwa trust, then cwa owners pay the mf.

On another note, I saw on facebook that a member called Atlantic City asking about her New Years Eve reservation and was told that they will cancel it.

It got me wondering what happens to owners of fixed week 52. Saturday check-in ends on Jan 3, 2026. They already paid the mf last year for a 7 day stay but can only use 4 of those days.
 
Wyndham has the deeds but if they are in the cwa trust, then cwa owners pay the mf.

On another note, I saw on facebook that a member called Atlantic City asking about her New Years Eve reservation and was told that they will cancel it.

It got me wondering what happens to owners of fixed week 52. Saturday check-in ends on Jan 3, 2026. They already paid the mf last year for a 7 day stay but can only use 4 of those days.
Not all of the deeds wyndham takes back go into the trust. Also, just because its in the trust doesn't mean Wyndham doesn't pay mf. , Wyndham owns all the unsold points, so they are paying the mf on those points.
 
Wyndham has the deeds but if they are in the cwa trust, then cwa owners pay the mf.

On another note, I saw on facebook that a member called Atlantic City asking about her New Years Eve reservation and was told that they will cancel it.

It got me wondering what happens to owners of fixed week 52. Saturday check-in ends on Jan 3, 2026. They already paid the mf last year for a 7 day stay but can only use 4 of those days.
good question on the week 52 folks.
 
Top