What the heck happens with my 2025 points that I deposited into 2026? I understand I'm not getting my 2026 points, but will those 2025 points remain active and usable for all of next year within CW?
Has Wyndham even been selling individual deeds or UDI at any of these properties for the last 10 years? I would have thought all inventory would be going through Club Wyndham Access now.What might happen to people that may still owe money on a loan for a developer purchase at one of these resorts?
Just a curious thought, I had.
I was thinking about people who booked through Saturday or Sunday. 2026 points wouldn't be implicated.True, but the MF is only going to cover through 2025.
This may happen anyway, as this year has a week 53, which may buy a few extra days?!
Yes, I know. But it's 1) the first official thing we'd seen from Wyndham about Shawnee and 2) the fact that it *doesn't* give more information than what was given for FG is quite....odd. Shawnee is a whole different ball of wax than FG; it's more like Edisto in its multiple HOAs, mixture of ownership types, etc. It'll be a lot more complex to unwind that relationship than at FG, and I would have expected a different message to Shawnee owners based on those facts.It’s the same exact statement Wyndham released mid July on their website. It doesn’t give anything pertinent or helpful.
acknowledging the closing of Skyline Tower.
Standing back a ways, it would make some sense for the drop-dead date to be 1/4/2026 -- the Sunday after 12/31. That should soften the blow for people who booked through the weekend.
I’m not so sure that’s new, so much as it is the original information from Club Wyndham filtered through and paraphrased by the general manager at Skyline.There's new and more information here: "around 10 resorts" (not 14 or more) and not only the offer of a possible CWA swap but the possibility to "transfer their current Skyline deed to another property." Well, that's definitely a whole different ball of wax....
What the heck happens with my 2025 points that I deposited into 2026? I understand I'm not getting my 2026 points, but will those 2025 points remain active and usable for all of next year within CW?
Such an offer wasn’t previously mentioned, but what I’m saying is I don’t think this was a new offer to swap to a different resort, but just a local resort manager slightly misstating Wyndham’s original offer to swap to CWA only.I don’t recall the offer to swap to a different resort in any of the previous discussion, but I may have missed it. It would offer owners an opportunity to better control their MF costs (could possibly choose a resort with a better MF/pts ratio than CWA does.)
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The "around 10" resorts to be retired agrees with the current TUG chart of the number of places left after you take out the "consolidation" ones that would not be considered "resorts to be retired".There's new and more information here: "around 10 resorts" (not 14 or more) and not only the offer of a possible CWA swap but the possibility to "transfer their current Skyline deed to another property." Well, that's definitely a whole different ball of wax....
The "around 10" resorts to be retired agrees with the current TUG chart of the number of places left after you take out the "consolidation" ones that would not be considered "resorts to be retired".
So, I will not be giving my contracts away. I am going to let Wyndham foreclose on me.
Boy, this may be a fascinating case-study if even 50 percent of what this poster is posting is real. In general, we know from reports on TUG that credit hits for unpaid maintenance fee-only foreclosures are rare, and deficiency judgments for them are basically nonexistent. However, just because they are rare and unlikely, doesn't mean they are impossible. Legally, deficiency judgments are possible (depending on the state, etc.), but rarely would it be worth the effort for a developer/HOA to pursue one.Should at least be willing to pay or split the closing costs. Because they refuse, I see no difference between them and the vultures at Wyndham. So, I will not be giving my contracts away. I am going to let Wyndham foreclose on me.
There probably shouldn't be any, because I don't think Wyndham sold deeds at these properties in recent times. That said, legally, they'd likely still be on the hook for those loans. You'd hope Wyndham would do right by them though if Wyndham holds the note.What might happen to people that may still owe money on a loan for a developer purchase at one of these resorts?
Just a curious thought, I had.
At Patriots Place the inventory they foreclosed on got converted to CWA and WorldMarkThere probably shouldn't be any, because I don't think Wyndham sold deeds at these properties in recent times. That said, legally, they'd likely still be on the hook for those loans. You'd hope Wyndham would do right by them though if Wyndham holds the note.
No, you were not. You gave good adviceI was called “dramatic” for recommending that owners with reservations at the likely resorts in 2026 consider making backup plans, and that I had done so myself.
I am not the one bragging how I got a sweetheart deal over the misfortune off others. Now bragging I got it wrong, and you paid $1.00 for 2 contracts and not $2.00.A vulture? Really? For selecting one of the two possible paths I'm a vulture? In what way am I taking advantage of the difficulties of others?
What a jerk!
If you're done with Wyndham, does that mean you're done with TUG? Please say it is so!
Edit: I didn't pay $1.00 each. I paid $1.00 total for two contracts.
I guess we will find out! Please do update us of what actions, if any, T&L takes against you.Because of them, I will not give them away for nothing. I am always told here that what I pay Wyndham is a drop in the bucket and it will not be missed Then the same should apply to me being foreclosed on.
Done on purpose knowing Wyndham would read it. They have to collect and thanks to those commercial letters we had 4 years to prepare for this day. They may decide it is easier to just cancel the contractsBoy, this may be a fascinating case-study if even 50 percent of what this poster is posting is real. In general, we know from reports on TUG that credit hits for unpaid maintenance fee-only foreclosures are rare, and deficiency judgments for them are basically nonexistent. However, just because they are rare and unlikely, doesn't mean they are impossible. Legally, deficiency judgments are possible (depending on the state, etc.), but rarely would it be worth the effort for a developer/HOA to pursue one.
With all that said, we also know that T&L can be vindictive if you really stick it in their eye. Just ask @rickandcindy23 how vindictive they can be when you annoy them, and she didn't really do anything that overt other than running a rental business. In the case of @RENTER, you have a poster who indicates he runs a massive commercial renting enterprise, owns millions of points ($60,000 in annual dues would put it at likely 10 million or more), and further, leads a cabal of perhaps 100 other owners who do the same. This poster is now, publicly, indicating he is going to stick it to Wyndham by stopping payments, and is encouraging his other 100+ followers to do the same. He is doing so on a public forum that Wyndham higher-ups assuredly read, in a thread that they are certainly aware of. If even half of what he is posting is true I could really see Wyndham putting in the effort here to punch back pretty hard. From a pure business-sense standpoint, they would almost have to, to set an example so that others don't attempt to do what this poster is advocating. Deficiency judgments for six figures of unpaid maintenance fees, plus the costs of litigation, etc., could be pretty damaging.
In any event, it will be interesting to watch this play out.
@RENTER, you may want to stop publicly posting these plans and encouraging others to do the same, for your own sake.
So, the value of resale timeshares is in the crapper. That's not news. I bought from a broker -- he wasn't complaining. Don't know the unfortunate souls the broker dealt with.I am not the one bragging how I got a sweetheart deal over the misfortune off others. Now bragging I got it wrong, and you paid $1.00 for 2 contracts and not $2.00.
Then there are the others out there posting the closing of the resorts is creating a great buying opportunity to buy cheap resales.
Someone in a PM told me it is costing her a lot of money to dump her contracts. Vultures only think about themselves which is why they brag about their win with no consideration to the emotional pain off the seller.
Boy, this may be a fascinating case-study if even 50 percent of what this poster is posting is real. In general, we know from reports on TUG that credit hits for unpaid maintenance fee-only foreclosures are rare, and deficiency judgments for them are basically nonexistent. However, just because they are rare and unlikely, doesn't mean they are impossible. Legally, deficiency judgments are possible (depending on the state, etc.), but rarely would it be worth the effort for a developer/HOA to pursue one.
With all that said, we also know that T&L can be vindictive if you really stick it in their eye. Just ask @rickandcindy23 how vindictive they can be when you annoy them, and she didn't really do anything that overt other than running a rental business. In the case of @RENTER, you have a poster who indicates he runs a massive commercial renting enterprise, owns millions of points ($60,000 in annual dues would put it at likely 10 million or more), and further, leads a cabal of perhaps 100 other owners who do the same. This poster is now, publicly, indicating he is going to stick it to Wyndham by stopping payments, and is encouraging his other 100+ followers to do the same. He is doing so on a public forum that Wyndham higher-ups assuredly read, in a thread that they are certainly aware of. If even half of what he is posting is true I could really see Wyndham putting in the effort here to punch back pretty hard. From a pure business-sense standpoint, they would almost have to, to set an example so that others don't attempt to do what this poster is advocating. Deficiency judgments for six figures of unpaid maintenance fees, plus the costs of litigation, etc., could be pretty damaging.
In any event, it will be interesting to watch this play out.
@RENTER, you may want to stop publicly posting these plans and encouraging others to do the same, for your own sake.
The potential closing of the resorts has nothing to do with the selling prices. Contracts at these resorts have been offered for $1.00 on eBay with no bidding interest for more than a decade. The sellers just want to get out from under the maintenance fee payments. Following is the exchange with the broker marketing one of these contracts when I offered to buy it at the $1.00 + closing costs price of the eBay auction that expired without any bidding interest. After the transfer completes, the sellers will be freed from the monthly maintenance fee payments (they are happy) and I will take on all the risk and future maintenance fee payments (seems fair to me).Then there are the others out there posting the closing of the resorts is creating a great buying opportunity to buy cheap resales.
I've had that poster on ignore for a long time---long enough that I no longer even peek. Based on the bits I did read before I bid them adeiu, I doubt that even 10% of it is true.If even half of what he is posting is true
And that is saying something.You are easily in the Top Five Most Obnoxious Posters on the Wyndham Forum.