I usually write reviews, more so to save on the TUG membership fee. I am cheap, and don't want to spend the $15. I can see however where a $15 annual fee is a hurdle that is not high for many and saving that isn't enough to entice someone to write reviews. Reviews take time, lots of time. Some of mine an hour or more, but even a basic review is an investment in time. I also think the clear separation of the forums and the paid side of TUG makes the reviews an afterthought for those that frequent the forums. I rarely read reviews now since we tend to go back to the same properties and we often do research on other sites for things to do and places to eat when we venture somewhere new.
its just that the forums are completely separate from the membership...and in order for someone to NOT be displayed as a TUG member someone would physically have to remove the member code from their forum profile (after realizing their membership had expired).
Im actually ok with someone keeping the tag on their forum profile if they have supported TUG in the past even if they dont maintain their paid membership. they are still a part of the community!
I think this is something where you could perhaps get some more reviews, perhaps from more of the cheap people like me
. The "TUG Member" moniker is more of a badge (of honor?) that people see every day. I see it and think this person is doing something extra to support the cause. It also provides access to the members only Sightings/Distressed forum which is an incredible resource. However, given the information provided above, I don't really understand why I continue to take the time to write reviews. Until recently, I haven't really used any of the paid benefits of TUG. I only occasionally read reviews and only recently sold a few weeks on TUG that I was able to do so for free with the ad credits. However absent of selling on TUG, I don't see any major benefit of membership outside of the "TUG Member" badge and access to the Sightings/Distressed forum. However, since I can get access to both of those for free and without having to invest my time writing reviews to maintain that badge, I might forgo the effort and cost and ride it for free as long as I can. That isn't what anyone wants to think.
I continue to be a member and maintain my membership with reviews because it, I thought, allows me to continue to access the Sightings/Distressed forum and maintain my "badge". I suspect there are many others out there that do the same because they thought the same. It seems like a disservice to me that others can ride along and potentially use this valuable service without any extra investment of time or money.
Perhaps striping the "TUG Member" badge from non paying members will see more people willing to write reviews to get it back and/or maintain it in the future. We know very well that people see when that "TUG Member" badge goes missing. That TUG Member badge also shows loyalty to the community (just like people who boast about their reward status with hotel and airline brands). I am certainly not saying that people who aren't TUG members don't participate in the community because there are many that do, but why should they continue to get the added benefits while others over here are putting in extra time by writing reviews. I wish not think I have been going about it wrong all this time by investing my time with reviews when I could have used that time in other ways. There certainly is no shame in showing up as a "Guest" in the forums. If you aren't willing to continue to put in the extra effort (or money) like the rest of us, why should you be able to pin that "TUG Member" badge on proudly?
ETA: Enticing people with free membership, and extensions, when they already get the added benefits of membership in the forums doesn't really get people to write reviews.