Ralph Sir Edward
TUG Member
I thought this might be a good thing to yap about. (This it not talking about any particular conspiracy theory, but general requirements for one that lasts. . . )
The rules (that I consider necessary.)
Rule #1. The number of participants has to be small. Preferably only a handful. The more people involved, the less likely it is. (Rule #1(A). It helps if they are dead, preferably without any questioning.)
Rule #2. The official theory has to have gaps in the reasoning.
Rule #3 . There has to evidence that does not fit the official theory. The more evidence, and the more varied types of evidence. the better the grounds for a conspiracy theory.
Rule #4. There is something to gain for the officials, by some form of a cover-up. (I say gain, but it doesn't have to be financial. It could be things like preventing panic, power gains by people being supported by the official theory, ect.)
Feel free to comment or add to this. . .
The rules (that I consider necessary.)
Rule #1. The number of participants has to be small. Preferably only a handful. The more people involved, the less likely it is. (Rule #1(A). It helps if they are dead, preferably without any questioning.)
Rule #2. The official theory has to have gaps in the reasoning.
Rule #3 . There has to evidence that does not fit the official theory. The more evidence, and the more varied types of evidence. the better the grounds for a conspiracy theory.
Rule #4. There is something to gain for the officials, by some form of a cover-up. (I say gain, but it doesn't have to be financial. It could be things like preventing panic, power gains by people being supported by the official theory, ect.)
Feel free to comment or add to this. . .