ravenna
newbie
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2017
- Messages
- 35
- Reaction score
- 10
- Resorts Owned
- elara - las vegas - HGVC
Hello all.
I have just discovered timeshares and am intrigued; thinking of buying into Hilton GVC. I'm attracted to the emotional (non-monetary) benefits, as follows:
-- it would encourage me to vacation, since vacations are prepaid (ie, the MF is paid) and must be booked far in advance. This is the kick in the butt I need to plan some fun into my life.
-- I love the idea of having a very nice place in NYC and DC that's 'all mine' - that I can return to as years go by and and can view as "my place." VRBO or AirBnB might be cheaper, but I'd never be sure what I was getting and it would lack the familiarity of home-away-from-home
I can see, also, that for certain people there's a financial benefit built in: If you are someone who's dead-set on vacationing yearly in a high-end, resort-style place, it makes sense to join a club that lets you do that for less. Instead of paying 450/night for a two-bedroom suite in a topflight hotel, you can get a similar place for less through a timeshare club.
Please help me, however, with the number-crunching:
Suppose I join HGVC at 7000 points platinum. Let's set aside the purchase price of X thousand dollars (and the loss I'd be taking by spending it rather than investing it) and focus just on maintenance fees.
Currently MF on a 7000 platinum-point place bought at a Vegas Hilton property (best MF rates) are approx 1200/year and sure to rise. Add in the 'belonging fee' and the various 'point-rescue' and 'booking' fees, and it's likely to be about 1400 dollars per year in 2018.
So, if I burn up my points in a single week by using a large one-bedroom-plus room during peak-season, I will get one week of vacation per year, at a yearly cost (the MF) of about 1400 dollars for 7 nights. This comes to 200 dollars per night.
I could get a cheaper place without buying a timeshare - by going through Air-bnb, timeshare rentals, and/or campgrounds (I like to rough it sometimes). And I'd have the advantage of not having to book nine months in advance. I could go exactly where I want without being bound to the HGVC system. And I wouldn't be locked in and forced to keep paying for all eternity even if my finances take a downturn or if I find a more appealing deal elsewhere.
OTOH: If I often travel in the off-season and use studios, my seven thousand points and 1400 yearly dollars could stretch far beyond seven days, to more like 18 to 28 days. (Seven thousand points would actually get me a total of 21 nights in NYC at the W 57th property, provided I stayed in a studio and confined myself to quick visits from Mon-Thurs night during the gold season - which suits my schedule and travel style nicely.) So that's pretty great, actually. 1400 dollars for 21 nights in NYC is 67 dollars per night!!!!
In sum: I conclude that timeshares make economic sense for people who are economically secure (who won't miss the upfront buy-in money, and can pay in full without financing) and who plan to take yearly luxury vacations that they can schedule in advance. And they make *extra* sense for people who like traveling in studios and off-season, which gives far more vacation time for the same MF you must pay for a peak-season week in a larger place.
Have I got a good grasp of the economics? Am I missing anything? Old hands, please weigh in with anything I haven't thought of.
Thanks, everyone.
I have just discovered timeshares and am intrigued; thinking of buying into Hilton GVC. I'm attracted to the emotional (non-monetary) benefits, as follows:
-- it would encourage me to vacation, since vacations are prepaid (ie, the MF is paid) and must be booked far in advance. This is the kick in the butt I need to plan some fun into my life.
-- I love the idea of having a very nice place in NYC and DC that's 'all mine' - that I can return to as years go by and and can view as "my place." VRBO or AirBnB might be cheaper, but I'd never be sure what I was getting and it would lack the familiarity of home-away-from-home
I can see, also, that for certain people there's a financial benefit built in: If you are someone who's dead-set on vacationing yearly in a high-end, resort-style place, it makes sense to join a club that lets you do that for less. Instead of paying 450/night for a two-bedroom suite in a topflight hotel, you can get a similar place for less through a timeshare club.
Please help me, however, with the number-crunching:
Suppose I join HGVC at 7000 points platinum. Let's set aside the purchase price of X thousand dollars (and the loss I'd be taking by spending it rather than investing it) and focus just on maintenance fees.
Currently MF on a 7000 platinum-point place bought at a Vegas Hilton property (best MF rates) are approx 1200/year and sure to rise. Add in the 'belonging fee' and the various 'point-rescue' and 'booking' fees, and it's likely to be about 1400 dollars per year in 2018.
So, if I burn up my points in a single week by using a large one-bedroom-plus room during peak-season, I will get one week of vacation per year, at a yearly cost (the MF) of about 1400 dollars for 7 nights. This comes to 200 dollars per night.
I could get a cheaper place without buying a timeshare - by going through Air-bnb, timeshare rentals, and/or campgrounds (I like to rough it sometimes). And I'd have the advantage of not having to book nine months in advance. I could go exactly where I want without being bound to the HGVC system. And I wouldn't be locked in and forced to keep paying for all eternity even if my finances take a downturn or if I find a more appealing deal elsewhere.
OTOH: If I often travel in the off-season and use studios, my seven thousand points and 1400 yearly dollars could stretch far beyond seven days, to more like 18 to 28 days. (Seven thousand points would actually get me a total of 21 nights in NYC at the W 57th property, provided I stayed in a studio and confined myself to quick visits from Mon-Thurs night during the gold season - which suits my schedule and travel style nicely.) So that's pretty great, actually. 1400 dollars for 21 nights in NYC is 67 dollars per night!!!!
In sum: I conclude that timeshares make economic sense for people who are economically secure (who won't miss the upfront buy-in money, and can pay in full without financing) and who plan to take yearly luxury vacations that they can schedule in advance. And they make *extra* sense for people who like traveling in studios and off-season, which gives far more vacation time for the same MF you must pay for a peak-season week in a larger place.
Have I got a good grasp of the economics? Am I missing anything? Old hands, please weigh in with anything I haven't thought of.
Thanks, everyone.
Last edited: