johnmfaeth
TUG Member
Hi Linda,
This is more akin to the developer of a condominium apartment complex who uses their own inhouse people to do the closing. In the case of traditional real estate, the buyer will usually have counsel, but picture if the buyer had none and just used the sellers to get the paperwork done, but received no legal advice. Another similar situation is when a mortgage lender demands that the closing occured at the offices of their attorney. But again, both buyer and seller would typically have counsel, imagine if they didn't. The mortgage company's attorney represent neither, will just get the paperwork done.
Many large timeshare dealers, who often sell as principal, not broker, demand the use of their closing company which they also own or have an exclusive relationship with.
In legal terms/perspective, the closing company however dows not act as legal counsel to either party. It is "loyal" to the transaction and acts without bias to get it completed as a mechanical process. It does not provide "representation", nor specific legal advice to either side. Such things are the territory of the traditional attorney, Another analogy is that it is like the "runner" who gets the newly executed mortgage from a traditional residential closing to the recorder's office that same day.
Such items are usually fully disclosed up front by the big seller.
There are also a number of fully independent timeshare closing companies, they primarily target the individual resale market when sales are between private parties who met and agreed to a transaction, and then need it effectuated.
Hope this helps!
John
This is more akin to the developer of a condominium apartment complex who uses their own inhouse people to do the closing. In the case of traditional real estate, the buyer will usually have counsel, but picture if the buyer had none and just used the sellers to get the paperwork done, but received no legal advice. Another similar situation is when a mortgage lender demands that the closing occured at the offices of their attorney. But again, both buyer and seller would typically have counsel, imagine if they didn't. The mortgage company's attorney represent neither, will just get the paperwork done.
Many large timeshare dealers, who often sell as principal, not broker, demand the use of their closing company which they also own or have an exclusive relationship with.
In legal terms/perspective, the closing company however dows not act as legal counsel to either party. It is "loyal" to the transaction and acts without bias to get it completed as a mechanical process. It does not provide "representation", nor specific legal advice to either side. Such things are the territory of the traditional attorney, Another analogy is that it is like the "runner" who gets the newly executed mortgage from a traditional residential closing to the recorder's office that same day.
Such items are usually fully disclosed up front by the big seller.
There are also a number of fully independent timeshare closing companies, they primarily target the individual resale market when sales are between private parties who met and agreed to a transaction, and then need it effectuated.
Hope this helps!
John
Last edited: