• Welcome to the FREE TUGBBS forums! The absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 32 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 32 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 32nd anniversary: Happy 32nd Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    All subscribers auto-entered to win all free TUG membership giveaways!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Wish you could meet up with other TUG members? Well look no further as this annual event has been going on for years in Orlando! How to Attend the TUG January Get-Together!
  • Now through the end of the year you can join or renew your TUG membership at the lowest price ever offered! Learn More!
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

This is maddening!

I'm really glad you're getting a re-hearing. I'm hoping the Judge gives you time to show all the proof that you have that the plaintiff is slime, just a warning that he may not. He may make you stick to only the facts of the plaintiff's complaint for return of his security deposit $ and not want to bother with the proof that you have that the slimy plaintiff tried to get a backhanded judgment against you. In order to serve by publication you normally have to show due diligence that you made several attempts to find the new address of the defendants to serve them personally and only after reasonable exhaustive measures with no success does a judge normally allow service by publication, so it's a little troubling that the plaintiff got the judge to okay the service by publication. Most importantly, be sure you are prepared to defend yourselves on the main case first (photos of damage plaintiff caused, receipts for repair work, photos showing home before plaintiff rented it, etc.), and then if allowed bring all the proof you have that the defendant has been acting underhanded. Why did he wait so long to sue? Perhaps he was hoping you would think the time had passed and you were going to get rid of all your evidence of the damage. I do believe he was using his knowledge as an attorney to get the judgment against you without your knowledge so you would run out of time to fight it. Once the case is over turn over everything you have to the State Bar where that attorney practices. Even if he does not end up getting in trouble, there will be a record there that someone complained about his unethical practices. Good luck dealing with this. Boy, sure makes you think twice about ever renting to a lawyer, doesn't it! There not all bad like this, though you sure sound like you got stuck dealing with a schmuck!
 
You've piqued my interest. Keep posting.

I'm surprised you never sued the bastard or tried to get back the thousands you spent repairing the place after the trashing he did when he was a tenant.

-David
 
Re: Karen's problem, it is a simple matter to have the judgment set aside if the Judge has reason to believe that you were not properly served. You apparently have more than enough proof of that. The fact that you have shown up on multiple occasions to defend against the allegations will also be a strong point in your favor.

You might want to try talking to the Court Clerk before the hearing, and ask for the name of a local attorney who has experience defending against these types of cases. If for some reason things do not appear to be going your way during the hearing, you could ask for a 24 hour adjournment of the case to consult with an attorney.

Have you checked with the Bar Association in the jurisdiction where creepo is licensed? You should see if there are any complaints against him, and if any warnings or suspensions have occurred. He sounds like a mentally unbalanced individual. People like that usually receive complaints and warnings.

Good luck. Bravo for pursuing it.
 
Man, you Tuggers with legal knowledge are awesome! Just out of curiousity, how much was the security deposit that he's upset about?
 
Boy, sure makes you think twice about ever renting to a lawyer, doesn't it! There not all bad like this, though you sure sound like you got stuck dealing with a schmuck!
Funny you mention that. We've joked that people should never rent to lawyers. They aren't really a "protected class" that you could be charged with discrimination against such as a race, religion, age, etc.

As to some of the other questions people have posted, the amount of the security deposit is $2500. We're now out about $3300 over that amount which covers all the repairs, property manager's and our legal fees, and the cost of the plane tickets to fly down for the other small claims court case where he didn't show up.

It is clear to us that the guy didn't want us to know about this new small claims suit. After not showing up for the one last year, he filed this new one about a month after it. But, according to the court's instructions on filing a small claims matter, plaintiff has to send a demand letter and show that it was sent certified mail, return receipt. You're also supposed to show a copy of the actual envelope showing it was "refused or returned" and a copy of the return receipt showing it was signed for.

On this new case he had provided the court a copy of the first demand letter for the case that was dismissed and a copy of a bogus envelope with the postage printed on his office postage meter but no official post office stampings or cancellation marks and no copy of the return receipt post card that a recipient should have signed.

He faxed the judge a request to publish saying he was unable to serve the papers. His process server tried twice--he went to our old address one day, no one was home, left his card, new owner called, he came back the next day, she told him we'd moved to Nevada. End of any attempt to serve. (All this was in the copies of documents we got from the court.)

We definitely will be contacting the Nevada state board and filing a small claims case against the guy when tomorrow's proceedings are done.
 
Have you also considered lodging a complaint with the bar association of whatever state you (or rather he) is in?
Liz
 
Karen,

Best of luck in court and I'll be praying that good wins over evil!
 
Went to court today

We went to the small claims court today and were surprised that the tenant/attorney actually showed up. This was our first time to actually see and speak with him since our property manager always dealt with him and his wife. He was the egotistical @$$**** we thought him to be!

The judge let me show & tell about evidence that the tenant had not followed the rules about filing this latest small claims case and that he had already sued us last year for the same thing. The judge said he would take some time and look back at the records for the case last year.

Other cases were heard and then the judge called us back up to the desks. In the meantime, while my husband had stepped out of the courtroom to go to the restroom, the tenant approached him in the lobby and said if we would both agree to "walk away" from this issue and the notice on his credit report (amount he owed us beyond what the security deposit covered on the repairs was turned over to a collection agency) was removed, we could be done with all this. If we didn't agree, he planned to sue us in District Court and it would cost us a lot more money.

My husband came back inside and told me this and I went outside and talked with the guy, too. He said he was just interested in getting this "mark" off his credit report and I said if he paid us the $1200 we'd agree to that. He said no way would he pay us anything. He also said we couldn't sue him in small claims court because we should have counter-sued on last year's case & we didn't. He also said something about us not being experienced landlords and not knowing how things worked. We actually have had three other rental properties besides our current residence that was rented to that tenant and two others after him. Over the last 18 years we've dealt with probably 12-15 tenants in rental/lease situations.

When we were back in court and the judge looked over the records of the claim last summer, he said it had been dismissed "with prejudice" meaning the tenant couldn't sue us again for the same thing. Therefore, he dismissed this current case and, we assume, the judgement that went with it. We are to come back in 2-3 days to get copies of the ruling in this case.

I asked the judge, since the prior case was dismissed "with prejudice" toward the plaintiff, did that preclude us from bringing another small claims case against the tenant for the money he owes us. I told the judge the tenant had threatened us with a lawsuit in district court if we didn't walk away from this one. The judge said if we do bring about a new small claims case, the tenant will defend it with the idea that we should have filed a counterclaim when we first were sued. (We consulted a local attorney about doing that very thing, and she said it was best to just answer the first claim and then do a separate countersuit--bad advice we see now.)

I told the judge that this is the third time this matter has come before a court and we've never been allowed to give our side of the story. The first time it was filed in the wrong jurisdiction & thrown out; the second time plaintiff didn't show up and it was dismissed without us being allowed to speak; and this time it was dismissed because the second time it had been dismissed. The tenant started to bring up some issues like the handle of the microwave had broken off and we replaced the whole microwave & we had the whole house repainted for "normal wear & tear." The judge stopped him from going any further and we weren't allowed to respond.

We didn't have a chance to respond that we tried to find a replacement door for the microwave & it wasn't available anymore so we had to get a whole new one. We didn't get to say that the painting estimate was for $1900 and $300 of that was judged to be normal wear and tear and we were asking for just $1600 from him for painting, not the whole $1900. We also didn't get to say that in the past 18 years of renting properties, none of our other 12-15 tenants broke the handle off a microwave, broke cabinet drawers, tore cabinet doors off, left chocolate syrup dripping down the inside of the refrigerator along with other assorted molding liquids, broke the chandelier and left it sitting in the corner of garage, left paint stains and other unknown substance stains on the carpet in every room, left the oven in despicable condition & it's a self-cleaning oven that they never bothered to clean in two years; let the water softener run out of salt so that all kinds of deposits were inside the dishwasher; knocked a chunk off the stucco fireplace hearth, nailed holes all across the front of the stucco mantle, killed part of the grass on the front lawn by leaving big objects on the grass long enough to kill it, left all kinds of trash in and around the house including a 200 lb. clay pot, left big gouge marks on the bedroom wall, left several marks on the hallway that looked like maybe they were doing a height chart on how much their kids had grown in two years, did not return the keys or garage door openers, did not show up for the walk through at the end of the lease after we had flown down from Seattle to be here for it, told the property manager he couldn't have the carpets cleaned because the power had been turned off & he's the one who turned it off in violation of the lease!

After we get the copies back of today's proceedings, we'll file our own small claims case and see what happens. We'll also file a report with the state bar association about the irregular way he filed this case today.

This is still MADDENING!!!:mad:
 
Last edited:
Property Management Woes. (How Much Justice Can You Afford?)

The Chief Of Staff knows somebody who rented out his nice suburban home while serving out of the country on a foreign service assignment. While 1 tenant was in the house for only eight -- 8 -- months total, the tenant's cat peed on every rug & carpet in the whole house. Upon moving out, the tenant threatened to sue if the landlord withheld any of the tenant's security deposit. Unfair as that was, the landlord refunded the full deposit rather than hassle with such a contentious ex-tenant.

In the situation you describe, I might have been inclined to bargain with the guy over that $1,200. Clearly he has the means & the inclination to lawyer-whip you over any & all unfinished business & unresolved issues pertaining to these cases. I might have said, "Tell you what. I'll settle for $600 cash & we'll both sign comprehensive release documents covering any and all issues between us for all events & all claims & all transactions from Day One up till the day we sign the release documents. How does that grab you?"

If he said OK, I'd get my lawyer to draw up comprehensive release documents to be signed & notarized & witnessed & recorded down at the county right along with the deed to the property, just in case the guy later tried recording any kind of lien.

Can't be too careful.

-- Alan Cole, McLean (Fairfax County), Virginia, USA.​
 
Karen, I still hope you have a valid claim against him. He made sure you didn't get served. He is a crooked attorney and was a bad tenanct too. :mad: Good luck!
 
Last edited:
In the situation you describe, I might have been inclined to bargain with the guy over that $1,200.
We were willing to accept $1200 as he now has cost us over $3300 with the added expenses he caused us with the other two lawsuits. He said he wouldn't pay us anything.
 
(How Much Justice Can You Afford?)

-- Alan Cole, McLean (Fairfax County), Virginia, USA.​

Alan, I understand and can appreciate your point but I hope Karen has the financial means to stand up to this bully. We lose more than money when we let them intimidate us. It is type of terrorism in my opinion. It seems to me that this man does it for sport as much as for anything else. He does it because he can. He needs to be stopped--or at least slowed down.

Karen, I am happy to see you are reporting him to the state bar. I hope that gets his attention.
 
Karen

I know this is very maddening for you.

Thank the stars you were able to resolve this so fast!!

I wouldn't have been surprized if you had told us that this wasn't going to be heard for several weeks if not months.

Good luck!
 
Legal Blackmail Ends With A Signed Comprehensive Release.

We were willing to accept $1200 as he now has cost us over $3300 with the added expenses he caused us with the other two lawsuits. He said he wouldn't pay us anything.
The vibe I'm getting off that lawyer ex-tenant is bad news.

Not saying he's right or you're wrong -- only that you might be money ahead by cutting your losses, if -- if -- he's willing to sign papers making it official that it's over & finished & done & permanently case closed.

That's what I meant by How Much Justice Can You Afford ?

I hate seeing the guy get over on you. I'd hate it more if he lawyer-whips you into even worse future trouble & unhappiness.

-- Alan Cole, McLean (Fairfax County), Virginia, USA.​

 
After we get the copies back of today's proceedings, we'll file our own small claims case and see what happens. We'll also file a report with the state bar association about the irregular way he filed this case today.

Good for you.

I might have been inclined to bargain with the guy over that $1,200. Clearly he has the means & the inclination to lawyer-whip you over any & all unfinished business & unresolved issues pertaining to these cases. I might have said, "Tell you what. I'll settle for $600 cash & we'll both sign comprehensive release documents covering any and all issues between us for all events & all claims & all transactions from Day One up till the day we sign the release documents. How does that grab you?"

If he said OK, I'd get my lawyer to draw up comprehensive release documents to be signed & notarized & witnessed & recorded down at the county right along with the deed to the property, just in case the guy later tried recording any kind of lien.

Karen's planned strategy will likely result in more back-and-forth, while yours might result in being done with it.

There are definite advantages to being done with it - probably the most important is to get the stress over with. However, I'm skeptical if that would really get the guy off Karen's back. He's such a jerk that any agreement on her part may be a sign of weakness, and he'll just keep coming back even with the documents you suggested.

I don't know which way I'd go, but Alan's remark here is wise.

I hate seeing the guy get over on you. I'd hate it more if he lawyer-whips you into even worse future trouble & unhappiness.
 
Last edited:
Under the British system of torts, the scumbag plaintiff who gave you all this grief would have to pay all the court costs and reimburse your attorney. This discourages frivilous law sutis in England. Unfortunately, the American Bar Association has argued to the American people that the British system discriminates against the poor and as a result the American legal system is more like entering the lottery. The American legal system is therefore rigged against honest, hardworking people. It has given birth to numerous professional plaintiffs.

Karen, if you are a landlord, you are assumed to be a greedy, corrupt, abuser of the the poor until proven otherwise according to the American legal system. I am glad that the sumbag lost his suit. However, it may cost you more money and aggravation than it is worth to pursue this matter any further. Remember, we have the best justice in America that money can buy.
 
Karen - I know you are frustrated - but at the end of this day your the winner.

The judge dismissed the case and judgment against you and the egotistical lawyer still has marred credit.

You may have a case - some hope is better than none and if the facts are listed correctly, you have the basis for a complaint with the bar association.

Today was a good start . . you did good :)
 
I'm not sure what the jurisdictional limit for small claims court is in Nevada but I believe here in California it is $7,500.00. By everything that you listed it seems to me like the damages to your home would have exceeded that. A very important thing to consider: If you file in small claims you represent yourself and cannot have a lawyer represent you (I believe this is true nationwide). You are suing a lawyer so you are already at a disadvantage. Especially if the rental contract he signed called for attorney's fees to the prevailing party I would certainly hire a lawyer to represent me against him rather than file a small claims lawsuit. All the evidence points to him being the irresponsible scummy lowlife pig and your only mistake was renting to him. It sounds to me like you would prevail. At the least consult with a lawyer who specializes in landlord-tenant law (specifically representing landlords) and really go after the guy. While it may cost you money up front I believe you would end up with potentially more $$ in your pocket than if you simply did a small claims action. I also say this because a losing defendant can appeal a small claims judgment to the higher court. So even if you win in small claims, being that he is a lawyer, it sounds to me like he's certainly the kind of defendant who would proceed to appeal, then you'd be dealing with the higher court and all kinds of court rules and obligations that would almost make it impossible for you to proceed without hiring a lawyer to represent you if he does appeal the small claims ruling if you win.
 
So even if you win in small claims, being that he is a lawyer, it sounds to me like he's certainly the kind of defendant who would proceed to appeal, then you'd be dealing with the higher court and all kinds of court rules and obligations that would almost make it impossible for you to proceed without hiring a lawyer to represent you if he does appeal the small claims ruling if you win.
We hadn't really thought of that possibility--even if we won a small claims case against him and got a judgement, he would appeal for sure just to cause us grief. :doh:
 
There's always Judge Judy. He sounds just egotistical to appear there and so long as your ducks are in a row and you can keep your cool, you'd likely win and show him to an audience of millions.
 
Even When You Win, You Lose.

We hadn't really thought of that possibility--even if we won a small claims case against him and got a judgement, he would appeal for sure just to cause us grief.
Not only that, if you got a judgment that stood up on appeal, then after that you'd have to figure out some way of collecting on that judgment. It's not automatic.

-- Alan Cole, McLean (Fairfax County), Virginia, USA.​

 
There's always Judge Judy. He sounds just egotistical to appear there and so long as your ducks are in a row and you can keep your cool, you'd likely win and show him to an audience of millions.
That would be fun!:D
 
Top