jp10558
TUG Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2022
- Messages
- 1,269
- Reaction score
- 846
- Location
- Southern Tier NY
- Resorts Owned
-
HGVC Seaworld
Wyndham Smoky Mountains
Foxrun Lake Lure
I think you may have missed my subtle point there which isn't that people won't forgive a lot of sins for cheap, but that they forgive less and less sins as the price goes up. And it's perception of being cheap, not whether it's relatively cheap when we're talking about luxuries like going out to eat. For instance, McDonalds kind of barely clears my price vs value bar. Really what gets them currently for me is more in the NE where they almost always have clean bathrooms so we're already stopped to use the restroom and grabbing a snack makes some sense vs going somewhere else for that.I'd love to be able to agree with this. But I don't see it happening.
The race to the bottom continues. And most people will gleefully buy any damned thing as long as it's cheap.
White Castle OTOH is cheaper than McDonalds for the burgers, but they're so bad I recoil at thinking about eating them again. I think each slider there is like $1.50 or something and yet I'd rather grab whatever I can get at a random gas station for more than that than eat White Castle again.
And in the Starbucks thread we see exactly what I'm talking about - Starbucks raised their prices too much and lowered their service (and I don't think ever had an amazing product) too much so people are going elsewhere. On top of that McDonalds decided to eat Starbucks lunches with much improved coffee at 1/2 the price of Starbucks.
I disagree that people will buy any damned thing as long as it's cheap - SPAMs market isn't increasing that I can see. Certainly we constantly lament more people don't buy rice and dried beans that are very cheap. I once had a Finnish "special remembrance cracker" that's mostly sawdust (look up the history). Even if those were the cheapest cracker around I wouldn't buy them.
I think the issue is when the stuff gets below people's threshold for quality they change their tune. You're lamenting most people just not seeing what has to be diminishing returns in like a $1,000 bottle of wine vs a $100 bottle, vs even a $25 bottle. And quality doesn't always improve as price goes up. Anyway, I see this all the time in all sorts of areas of life - there's "cheap crap", "good value", and "diminishing returns". Some people just want some calories and just because they're not interested in food doesn't mean they're racing to the bottom. I just think the chains need to justify their prices, and for places like Red Lobster that's getting harder and harder to do.The average consumer is going to protest, "Who cares? Seriously, who cares where the food comes from? Why do your mussels need to be from New Zealand? Why do you need mussels at all? Furthermore, why would anyone spend $1,000 for a bottle of wine when two-buck Chuck will get you just as drunk?"