What I don't see value in is folks changing the price/point based upon the number of points I intend to rent. That makes no sense to me. This should be based upon fair market value not what the seller needs to make up for his MF.
I don't really see the effort required to transfer points. I have already done it a few times and it takes all of 2 minutes on the phone with MVCI.
I think renting points is just like any other business. You have fixed cost and variable cost. In this case my mf would be a variable cost based on number of points, and my fixed cost is the amount of time it takes to complete a rental. Sure the actual phone call can only take 2 mins, but I also have to place an ad, resond to e-mail inquires, fill out a rental agreement, call mvci, verify with e-bay that payment was received, trasfer money into my bank account. All of these may seem trivial but they add up if you're forced to make many small transactions.
So I would say I want $20 for my time in fixed cost (random number) plus my maintence fees and some portion of my buy in cost (why sell something at a loss). Now that is what I want, I'll place an ad and if someone is willing to pay that, then yes in deed it is "Market Price". It may not be the price you're willing to pay, but one person is only a small part of the Market.
Greg's data basically mirrors what I see on the DVC point rental market. The only difference there is that the market value of the points are much higher than the mf. I just rented out some points for $13/point, my mf are $4.50/pt. The difference here comes from the high buy in cost of DVC. I think the base of existing legacy owners are skewing the DC point rental market. I believe if it were based soley on Trust points, it would be a higher value. But for now at least a legacy point and Trust point seem to be getting you the same reservation, so why pay more for a trust point.