So far, DH is leaning towards the Weber. His summary of reviews were that it's easier to clean and lighter weight, therefore more easily portable.
I wanted a large deck model and he wanted something that would feed a small group, yet work for the travel trailer. I'll probably let him make this "big" decision. (Heck, it's only a small grill, but seems we--DH & I-- like to analyze these things, maybe too much.) :rofl:
Kathy, glad you've had direct experience, and thanks.
We cook for 6 to 8 hours at least 7 Saturdays a fall while tailgating for football games feeding 20 to 50 or more people. For us it is hands down the coleman because of the 2 separate burners vs one burner on the Weber (put one on low for shrimp/hot dogs/etc and the other on higher for steaks, burgers), the more powerful 20,000 BTU's generated (12,000 Weber), the built in stand, the wheels to roll it on rather than carry, the coleman is actually lighter than the Weber WHICH DOES NOT HAVE A STAND (44 pounds versus 45 Weber which you have to carry rather than roll),different grate options weber doesn't ffer, (griddle, etc), you can get an adapter and usle the large propane tanks on the Coleman to use at home but not with the Weber, and because you can buy the road trip for about $160 on sale versus the Weber on sale for about $190 (without the optional $100 stand which is flimsy) .
If you get the smaller Weber 100 it is lighter but only has one burner with 9500 btu's and a really small cooking area.
The Weber is easier to clean (I have owned both), but other than that I like everything about the Coleman better (buy a 20,000 BTU model). The Weber is built well and my friend owns one he used to bring tailgating with us but he NEVER brings his weber anymore preferring to cook on my Coleman. I gave my old grill to my son and it is still working. Both are great portable grills, I prefer the Coleman for the above reasons. You will be happy with either.
PS I own the largest Coleman which is the Road Trip Pro with 345 square inches of coking area and 24,000 BTU's and a weight of 65 pounds. Most people do not need that much portable grill but we do.
http://www.coleman.com/coleman/roadtrip/
http://www.roadtripgrill.net/coleman-roadtrip-grill-weber-q200-grill-comparison/
Below are highlights of both.
Comparison of features:
Coleman
Cooking Area: 285 square inches
BTU: 20,000 BTU dual burners
Dual burner
Push button matchless lighting
Removable catch pan
Two porcelain-enameled cast-iron cooking grates
Grate options available: YES
FUEL USE: Operates on 16.4oz. propane cylinder
LARGE TANK ADAPTABLE: Yes
Grill weight: 44 lbs.
Dimensions (in collapsed state): 33″ x 19″ x 14″H
Height in use: 35″ tall
Warranty: Limited 5 year
MSRP: $179.99
Weber Q 200
Cooking Area: 280 square inches
BTU: 12,000 BTU burner
Single burner
Push button matchless lighting
Removable catch pan
One porcelain-enameled cast-iron cooking grate
Grate options available: NO
FUEL USE: Uses disposable 14.1- or 16.4 oz. LP cylinder
LARGE TANK ADAPTABLE: No
Grill weight: 45 lbs.
Dimensions: 32.5″ x 18″ x 16.7″H
Height in use: 16.7″ tall*
Warranty: Limited 5 year
MSRP: $219.00
Most Recent Sale Price: $188.00