irandy1948
TUG Member
THIS IS A VERY OPEN ENDED QUESTION, WHICH IS GENERALLY A BETTER VALUE, POINTS OR A TRADITIONAL TIMESHARE.
THIS IS A VERY OPEN ENDED QUESTION, WHICH IS GENERALLY A BETTER VALUE, POINTS OR A TRADITIONAL TIMESHARE.
VERY GOOD INFO FOLKS, AND I APPRECIATE IT. I GET TWO WEEKS VACATION FROM WORK. SO WE TEND TO LOOK AT BEING FLEXIBLE
AND TAKING LONG WEEK ENDS. I MIGHT BE BETTER OFF WITH POINTS TO ACCOMMODATE OUR THREE DAY OR FOUR DAY VACATION PLANS.
As mentioned already, there are many different "points" systems and no two are particularly alike, nor do their points "currencies" correlate. Make very sure that any points system that you might end up zeroing in on actually provides for partial week / daily usage of allocated points.
Also, be prepared that daily points charges will generally not just be 1/7th of a full weeks' worth of points, but considerably more than 1/7th. On Planet Timeshare, the devil is always in the details, so keep your magnifying glass handy as you pursue your quest.![]()
THEO, YOU HAVE CREATED NEW QUESTIONS FOR ME, IS THERE MAYBE A POST ON THE BOARD THAT LISTS THE QUESTIONS THAT I SHOULD BE ASKING AS I TRAVEL THE INS AND OUTS OF POINTS?
THEO, YOU HAVE CREATED NEW QUESTIONS FOR ME, IS THE MAYBE A POST ON THE BOARD THAT LIST THE QUESTIONS THAT I SHOULD BE ASKING AS I TRAVEL THE INS AND OUTS OF POINTS?
THIS IS A VERY OPEN ENDED QUESTION, WHICH IS GENERALLY A BETTER VALUE, POINTS OR A TRADITIONAL TIMESHARE.
Actually you can if you have one of the relatively few fixed weeks in the Marriott system that is enrolled or eligible to be enrolled in the new point system. Once enrolled, you can choose to convert to points in any given year from a fixed week the same as from a floating week, and those points can be banked or borrowed to do exactly what you are suggesting. Legacy weeks owners in the Marriott system (I happy to be one) truly have the best of both worlds if they enroill their eligible weeks because they can play in points or weeks as they choose, and the election may be made or not made every year.One other plus about points that can't be done with fixed weeks as far as I know is to save and borrow. For example. if I get 10,000 points a year I can typically save a year and borrow a year to use 30,000 on a splurge in a fancy unit, for a longer stay, or for a couple units if I am hosting others.
You really need to consider what you own and how you'll use it. For instance. I own a bunch of timeshares...points, fixed week, etc. One of them is the fourth of July week in northern Michigan by Traverse City. I can float this if I want but only if I give up my fixed week. No one wants to go there in the spring and fall. Most want either ski season or summer for golf. The load on the summer weeks is huge. If this was a full points membership it would very very difficult to pull a summer week out of the whole total because basically you have 12 months of owners vying for only 3 months of units (June-Aug). Now, if you own in a less than desirable month then points may actually help you. For me, after years of dealing with TS's, it comes down to this. If you have a high demand property in high demand time, try to get it as a fixed week. That way you can always use it, or it will trade for high value going somewhere else.THIS IS A VERY OPEN ENDED QUESTION, WHICH IS GENERALLY A BETTER VALUE, POINTS OR A TRADITIONAL TIMESHARE.
I would appreciate the input from knowledgable owners on this aspect of the question about deeded weeks vs. points:
With deeded weeks there is a finite number of unit-weeks. Only so many owners chasing a fixed number of beds. They can't sell the same unit-week deed to more than one person.
With points - what keeps a developer from selling an unlimited number of points giving thousands of people theoretical 'access' to a fixed physical asset? The developer is the one who assigns the number of points required to reserve a unit. So, the number of points required to reserve the unit constantly goes up and up..... Kind of like inflation where the Fed Reserve keeps printing money so that it takes more $ to buy that loaf of bread.
Is this something that sales people are supposed to explain?
Seems like a real winner for the developer because the MFs you are billed for are based on the number of points you own. With more points floating the cost of maintenance of the fixed asset per point should be lower. Has anyone ever seen the MF per point go down?