• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 30th anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $23,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $23 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

New Timeshare Exchange Company [Proposal]

escanoe

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Messages
2,477
Reaction score
1,571
Location
Washington, DC
Resorts Owned
HGVC: Flamingo & Anderson Ocean Club
Vacation Village: Woodstone at Massanutten and Grandview (RCI Points) & the Colonies
If any developer/resort group attempts to restrict our Members from booking accommodations for guests, while allowing other Exchange Companies to do so, then that may be a possible violation, inter alia, of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890, and we would then act accordingly.

I don't blame the FTC for focusing on more pressing things, but IMHO more aggressive enforcement of anti-trust laws would be beneficial to timeshare owners. I believe the industry has some vulnerability, in general, here. But I think it could take forever and another year for private litigation to change things much.

I am not saying it is impossible, but you are going to be looking at some major legal fees to sue Goliath for unfairly gaming his bigness.
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2024
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
Resorts Owned
Lion's Gate Pine Lodge CO, Petit Crest Villas GA, FlexiClub South Africa
I don't blame the FTC for focusing on more pressing things, but IMHO more aggressive enforcement of anti-trust laws would be beneficial to timeshare owners. I believe the industry has some vulnerability, in general, here. But I think it could take forever and another year for private litigation to change things much.

I am not saying it is impossible, but you are going to be looking at some major legal fees to sue Goliath for unfairly gaming his bigness.
Yes and No. The National Association of Realtors ('NAR'), the biggest trade organization in the country with a 1.5m Membership basis, has recently entered into a $418m Class Action Settlement with certain plaintiffs who alleging violations of Anti-Trust Laws and who won a court verdict against NAR (and the case against NAR was weak to non-existent in my opinion). With this precedent however, Contingency Based Trial Lawyers are out hunting other potential deep-pocketed 'Goliaths' to slaughter, and Big Corporations will be 'running scared' for some time to come.
 

escanoe

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Messages
2,477
Reaction score
1,571
Location
Washington, DC
Resorts Owned
HGVC: Flamingo & Anderson Ocean Club
Vacation Village: Woodstone at Massanutten and Grandview (RCI Points) & the Colonies
May be running scared, but wheels of justice turn slow.

Over on the Diamond forum they are discussing a recent $13 million settlement from litigation that started back in 2013. And Diamond


I am wishing you luck and would love to partake in your venture while recognizing thigs are stacked against this working.
 

Carolinian

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
10,822
Reaction score
1,073
Location
eastern Europe
The Points 'Charged' for Interval 'Withdrawal' would be dynamic and 'Yield Management' determined, with the purpose of maximizing occupancy rates, so astute Members who were prepared to 'roll the dice' and wait closer to occupancy dates (or book lower demand inventory way in advance), could still find really good 'bargains' ('dynamic yield management pricing' would actually enhance these opportunities). Most airlines and event some hotels use 'Dynamic Yield Management' pricing models to fly their planes at near 100% occupancy ('an empty seat is lost revenue'). Last year I snagged a one-way flight from Atlanta to Denver on Frontier for 27c (excluding taxes, baggage and upgrade fees). With taxes the flight came to about $30.

I would not deal with any points based system where the formula for setting points is not published. RCI is a great example of how a nonpublished system of awarding points is corrupted in a way that favors resorts still in sales and disfavors sold out resorts. Pusblishing the point numbers by resorts only points out the corruption of their points system.

I much prefer a weeks-based exchange system. RCI was great until they went to points and points lite.

Another big red flag is exchange companies that also rent out exchange deposits to the general public. We have seen too much corruption there with at least one of the big exchange companies.
 

Carolinian

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
10,822
Reaction score
1,073
Location
eastern Europe
Spot on. I'm not going to go into too much detail here, but there are actually huge chasms of opportunity opening up, and they go well beyond just timeshares. One just needs to think a little outside the proverbial box.

Wholly owned holiday cottages can fit well into a timeshare exchange system. The old DAE Europe used to get quite a bit of such inventory in the UK and France.
 

escanoe

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Messages
2,477
Reaction score
1,571
Location
Washington, DC
Resorts Owned
HGVC: Flamingo & Anderson Ocean Club
Vacation Village: Woodstone at Massanutten and Grandview (RCI Points) & the Colonies
I would not deal with any points based system where the formula for setting points is not published.

What points based system does publish this? I don’t believe that RCi, HGVC, Marriott, II points, or any other company with an exchange does this. I would like it if they did, but I don’t know that points-based exchanges are an option if someone has your high standard.

I also see this being hard with a dynamic system as the OP intends to create.

Why set this standard for points systems and not others. Trading weeks in II has no transparency on relative values. It is a complete black box as far as what the company discloses.
 

pchung6

TUG Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
1,131
Reaction score
580
Location
Carlsbad, CA
Resorts Owned
WKORVN-OF, SVVx3, SBP, MKO-OV, MWR
It might be hard to break into exchange business as you need to be affiliated with major resorts to receive bulk deposits. However will you consider rental business similar to Redweek but better? I believe rental business has large customer audiences and market opportunities than just exchange business. A lot owners will want to look for opportunities to cash out or get rid of unwanted weeks. It is easier to scale up and you don’t have to deal with resorts.
 

chapjim

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2010
Messages
6,603
Reaction score
4,182
Location
Fairfax County, Virginia
Resorts Owned
Wyndham VIPF & PresRes, HVC/DRI (Gold), Quarter House (4), Resort on Cocoa Beach (2), HGVC Tuscany Village, HGVC South Beach-McAlpin, HGVC Parc Soleil
[Deleted]
 
Last edited:

escanoe

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Messages
2,477
Reaction score
1,571
Location
Washington, DC
Resorts Owned
HGVC: Flamingo & Anderson Ocean Club
Vacation Village: Woodstone at Massanutten and Grandview (RCI Points) & the Colonies
It might be hard to break into exchange business as you need to be affiliated with major resorts to receive bulk deposits. However will you consider rental business similar to Redweek but better? I believe rental business has large customer audiences and market opportunities than just exchange business. A lot owners will want to look for opportunities to cash out or get rid of unwanted weeks. It is easier to scale up and you don’t have to deal with resorts.

There must be higher barriers to entry or challenges in reaching critical mass on this than I would have thought. Go-koala has impressed me, but it appears to be a long, hard slog for a better product to compete with Redweek.

And TUG has long played in this space as well.
 

Carolinian

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
10,822
Reaction score
1,073
Location
eastern Europe
What points based system does publish this? I don’t believe that RCi, HGVC, Marriott, II points, or any other company with an exchange does this. I would like it if they did, but I don’t know that points-based exchanges are an option if someone has your high standard.

I also see this being hard with a dynamic system as the OP intends to create.

Why set this standard for points systems and not others. Trading weeks in II has no transparency on relative values. It is a complete black box as far as what the company discloses.

The problem with all of those systems and the reason I do not participate in any of them is that their point assignments are corrupt, often based on factors other than supply and demand. If you want an honest exchange system, the very worst combination is published exchange numbers and a non-published formula to establish them. RCI points is notorious for overpointing resorts still in developer sales and underpointed sold out resorts, for example.
 
Top