• Welcome to the FREE TUGBBS forums! The absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 31 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 32 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 32st anniversary: Happy 32st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    All subscribers auto-entered to win all free TUG membership giveaways!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

Master Stay Requirement

goodbadugly

Guest
Joined
Jun 10, 2022
Messages
194
Reaction score
77
So this was a new one on me but I'm sure many of you are aware of it. I tried to book a two bedroom stay in Ft Lauderdale in March for 4-5 days. The reservation system came back with only studios available. I changed the request to seven days and a two bedroom was available. I called MVC and explained my situation. I was told that the property has a Master Stay requirement for the days I wanted. I asked if there was a list of such rules for all the properties and any other rules I should know about on the website. The representative did not know. I asked to speak to a supervisor. After waiting two times each for 15+ minutes the representative asked if I would like a call back. I responded yes. At the end of completing the form he needed to fill out which included confirming my number and email address the last kick in the face was a supervisor would get back to me in 3-5 days. This program is just getting to hard and frustrating to manage. I can't believe I'm saying this but I wish I was a lawyer so I could go after these guys!!!
 
This is often referred to here as a minimum stay requirement. It has been well discussed in prior threads. If you search the forum for "minimum stay", with the quotes, those threads will turn up.
 
This is often referred to here as a minimum stay requirement. It has been well discussed in prior threads. If you search the forum for "minimum stay", with the quotes, those threads will turn up.
Thanks. So what other rules do they have or make up to make our points even more worthless?
 
Thanks. So what other rules do they have or make up to make our points even more worthless?
As I understand it there is not an across the board MVC rule- the resorts choose and place their own restricts.
I know Crystal Shores often has a minimum number of nights restrictions.
I usually book a full week so I hadn’t run into it often.
As Dioxide says you can pull up other discussions and examples but I think it really varies by resort, season etc and you can’t draw an overall conclusion.
 
So this was a new one on me but I'm sure many of you are aware of it. I tried to book a two bedroom stay in Ft Lauderdale in March for 4-5 days. The reservation system came back with only studios available. I changed the request to seven days and a two bedroom was available. I called MVC and explained my situation. I was told that the property has a Master Stay requirement for the days I wanted. I asked if there was a list of such rules for all the properties and any other rules I should know about on the website. The representative did not know. I asked to speak to a supervisor. After waiting two times each for 15+ minutes the representative asked if I would like a call back. I responded yes. At the end of completing the form he needed to fill out which included confirming my number and email address the last kick in the face was a supervisor would get back to me in 3-5 days. This program is just getting to hard and frustrating to manage. I can't believe I'm saying this but I wish I was a lawyer so I could go after these guys!!!
As I noted here before, I've discussed this issue directly with Corporate. The contact person investigated and was genuinely helpful. The answer was that each property has a corporate level inventory manager who controlled these minimum stay requirements as well as the number of 2 BR units that could be locked off for given properties. I got the sense that there were several of them but not one for each property. When I stated that it should be listed somewhere so we could know, I was told it was too fluid to do so. I disagreed but the person with whom I was speaking did not have control and would pass it along. IMO if they can input it in the system they can put it on HUB or a link on the reservation page or even a pop up when applicable. Beachplace seems to be one of the locations where this is routine. I currently have a reservation there in a similar situation where I only need 1 night in a 2 BR but had to reserve 4 nights. I was planning on sending an email off the website to shorten it as I was told this was often possible but haven't yet. This AM I did get an exchange that covers the night so I may. not need it after all depending on re-trading options.
 
Thanks Dean. Too fluid is BS. Just another excuse for them not to want to do something. In this particular case it would probably show how prevalent across all properties this occurs and would illustrate another reason why the point system is a con!
 
Thanks Dean. Too fluid is BS. Just another excuse for them not to want to do something. In this particular case it would probably show how prevalent across all properties this occurs and would illustrate another reason why the point system is a con!
Personally I am OK with minimum stay requirements they just need to be noticed and consistent. That's one of the beauties of TUG and other such venues to allow dissemination of information. If you have enough points, reserve then see if you can shorten the reservation.
 
That's a good idea. I'd like to hear from the TUG community to see if anyone has had a positive experience doing that. BTW transparency is not one of their behaviors.
 
That's a good idea. I'd like to hear from the TUG community to see if anyone has had a positive experience doing that. BTW transparency is not one of their behaviors.
I have done so and others have reported both being able to do so and being denied. All you can do is try. If you have enough points and they say no, you could always hold it and try later either for the shorter stay or to shorten it later. My personal experience is with Beachplace in this regard where I've seen significant requirements that varied by the time of the year and weekend vs weekday. Seems to be a larger issue during holiday and winter Platinum time from what I've seen. I've even seen it vary where it was less restrictive one day and more restrictive the next. The last time I had direct experience caused me to start looking and I found several weeks where the requirement was for a full 7 days.
 
In this particular case it would probably show how prevalent across all properties this occurs and would illustrate another reason why the point system is a con!
Like @Dean I have no problem with resorts having minimum stay requirements but want MVC resorts to let us know what the restrictions are during the booking process (as the RCC St Thomas does). I own a mix of weeks and Abound Points and understand that there is a big difference between actual ownership at a resort and exchanging in using Abound Points.

That's a good idea. I'd like to hear from the TUG community to see if anyone has had a positive experience doing that. BTW transparency is not one of their behaviors.
I've never actually had to shorten a reservation while the minimum stay restrictions were still in effect. Some I've ended up using in their entirety, some I've cancelled outright when something better came along and some I've shortened when I noticed that the resort/villa type/month in question allowed short stays to be booked.
 
Don’t sell me on being able to book one day at a time at 13 months and then not allow it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I honestly haven't ever understood this criticism, not when it's applied to Club Points nor when it's applied to floating Weeks. Unless we own Fixed Week-Fixed Date-Fixed Unit intervals, the ability/right to reserve certain usage with Marriott timeshares hasn't ever equalled a guarantee of certain desired reservations.

Unless we own any of those intervals, of which there are VERY few across the Marriott portfolio, every single one of us bought into this system that's conditional on myriad "subject to availability" caveats when using our ownerships. Sometimes other owners get there ahead of us, sometimes Marriott exercises its rights and gets there ahead of us, sometimes it's Marriott-as-Manager imposing rules/restrictions either permanently or temporarily by exercising their right to forecast usage, sometimes it's the resort GM's working with M-as-M to implement restrictions that protect against too much breakage in inventory, etc etc etc

I agree with those in this thread who recognize Marriott's right to occasionally put availability restrictions on Points reservations, but just wish they could be known by users before going through the reservation process.
 
Last edited:
Don’t sell me on being able to book one day at a time at 13 months and then not allow it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
IMO it's not about what's sold but about what the legal paperwork says. I don't think any of us should rely on what a salesperson says and if we do, shame on us.
 
IMO it's not about what's sold but about what the legal paperwork says. I don't think any of us should rely on what a salesperson says and if we do, shame on us.
For me, it’s not what the sales folks say, MVC’s own explanation of the benefit levels (linked below) say 13 months 1+ night with no asterisk explaining more. Only comment at bottom is about Ritz 3 night minimum. If they are applying further minimums, at least communicate them.

 
I get the fine print part. My post is more about what was promised in a sales presentation and it was tongue in cheek for the most part. I've owned Marriott for 25 years, and know how to get the most out of my ownership.
 
I had the same issue with a stay at Ft Lauderdale, wanted 5 nights but not available, but looked for 7 and it was. After a lengthy discussion with the phone rep, he contacted some one, and was able to get me the 5 nights. A LOT of BS for something that is in writing: 13 months out / one day at a time EXCEPT Ritz Carlton. Never ran into this except with Beach Place Towers, but assume there are other places.

We are stuck between a rock and hard place. We could be VERY vocal about not purchasing any Marriott Abound Points, and currently I am pro Marriott Vacation Club (even though time and again they try my patience with BS) but that would inevitably cause a bigger increase in MF as less people purchase.

I wonder if anyone has ever gone to a MVC board meeting and raised all the inconsistencies and issues?
 
Don’t sell me on being able to book one day at a time at 13 months and then not allow it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I understand your issue. It ticks me off as well because that was one of the benefits I could use.

I also understand the need to keep as many unbroken weeks as possible for deeded weeks owners wanting to stay on their owned time. We own silver season at Ocean Pointe. We like to go the first 2 weeks of December and we typically reserve the entire unit rather than lock off. Unfortunately, probably because Ocean Pointe allows partial weeks booking at 13 months, we can’t book our preferred week in our preferred unit size in our owned season. So from that point of view I really wish they’d save enough weeks for those of use that own deeded weeks to reserve our units at 12 months out for any week in our season. I can see that allowing broken weeks at maybe 9 months in advance, but give deeded weeks owners the opportunity to book the most in demand weeks during their season first.
 
For me, it’s not what the sales folks say, MVC’s own explanation of the benefit levels (linked below) say 13 months 1+ night with no asterisk explaining more. Only comment at bottom is about Ritz 3 night minimum. If they are applying further minimums, at least communicate them.

There is wording in the legal docs that allow for such restrictions. I get that it sucks but there are other considerations. Making short reservations during high demand times increases orphaned nights and ultimately increases fees as well. IMO MVC should be more forthcoming so we all know what to expect but I don't think it possible to say there was a formal promise to be able to make single night reservations across the board. Obviously there are sales people out there who have been less than honest about such matters.
Exchange Company may impose

minimum stay requirements for high demand Use Periods at Accommodations at any Component from

time to time as it deems appropriate in its sole discretion.
Exchange Company shall have the right to forecast anticipated reservations and use of the

Accommodations and is authorized to demand balance, reserve, deposit, or rent the

Accommodations for the purpose of facilitating the use or future use of the Accommodations or

other benefits made available to Program Members through the Program in its sole discretion.


Unless the Affiliate Program Documents provide otherwise, Exchange Company has the right to

establish priority lists, lottery systems, or other alternative methods of reserving Accommodations in an

effort to ensure the fair and equitable reservation and use of Accommodations during holidays, events, and

other high demand periods. If implemented, access to certain Use Periods by a Program Member may be

restricted in a given year based upon the Program Member’s ranking in a lottery or some other allocation

methodology established by Exchange Company. Exchange Company may establish an administrative

fee for this service. Exchange Company may restrict the number of weeks or days that may be reserved

by a Program Member during holidays, events, or other high demand periods and Exchange Company may

create alternate reservation procedures and the Exchange Point Schedule may be revised on a Market-

specific or Component-by-Component basis to account for discrepancies in Markets, legal structures, travel

patterns, or other factors as determined by Exchange Company from time to time. Exchange Company

also has the right to establish certain priorities or alternate methods of reserving Accommodations for or

designate specific Accommodations or Use Periods that may only be reserved by Program Members

during, the first twelve (12) months of the Program Members’ participation in the Program, for purposes of

educating and facilitating the use of the Program by such new Program Members.
 
Top