• Welcome to the FREE TUGBBS forums! The absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 32 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 32 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 32nd anniversary: Happy 32nd Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    All subscribers auto-entered to win all free TUG membership giveaways!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

Marriott Vacations Worldwide 3Q Sales Decline; Stock Tanks

I plan on asking them at my encore in December if I can enroll my week for $715 like Hilton allowed. I fully expect to get turned down but the difference in policy is quite staggering.
 
Hmm, see this is where it depends on what you're looking for. None of those have 2BR Sat to Sat (or a week) except Vegas, and Vegas / Orlando are kinda the exceptions to booking rules as they're sooo overbuilt you can usually book something from anyone. I've had to book right out for McAlpin Plaza 2BR and only seen it in December, Ocean Oak for Feb... I think I jumped on MarBrisa also at or around 9 months. Usually when I look at say 6 months at multiple locations, all weeks are scarce, you can find 2-4 days here and there but not a full week.
The only place I have had issues booking is Hilton Head. We always book at 9 months. Now, I’ve tried to book a ski weekend or a SW Florida affiliate. I have booked Elara at 6-7 months, though.
 
lots of pages (and fun stuff to discuss tonight on the live show)....but as someone pointed out earlier marriott is an outlier here with other systems meeting or exceeding expectations on their statements.

what is MVC doing differently than hilton to see such a sales decline? or perhaps its just a single quarter aberration and they pick right back up where they left off to end the year.
 
lots of pages (and fun stuff to discuss tonight on the live show)....but as someone pointed out earlier marriott is an outlier here with other systems meeting or exceeding expectations on their statements.

what is MVC doing differently than hilton to see such a sales decline? or perhaps its just a single quarter aberration and they pick right back up where they left off to end the year.
Given that MVW has now replaced their CEO and their #2 guy suddenly decided to retire the next day, it sure seems like whatever is going on is more than a single quarter aberration.
 
lots of pages (and fun stuff to discuss tonight on the live show)....but as someone pointed out earlier marriott is an outlier here with other systems meeting or exceeding expectations on their statements.

what is MVC doing differently than hilton to see such a sales decline? or perhaps its just a single quarter aberration and they pick right back up where they left off to end the year.
They pivoted from a reasonably wholesome TS product that had been successful for years, because they only had trash inventory left that no one wanted to buy at their exorbitant rates (and excruciatingly high MF equal to platinum inventory), to a smoke and mirrors fake overlay points system.

The have been trying to sell the dream of a Hawaii vacation to people in a trust that is filled with low season trash (Myrtle Beach) weeks. Per the recent report, they have focused on owners who know the system and its limitations. The rise of the internet and social media has resulted in a flood of information to those that buy this garbage and rescind, or refuse to buy at all. They are running out of lemmings.

Also, they continue to hide the decline in sales with increased profits from management fees, which increased MF, and makes it harder to sell.
 
They pivoted from a reasonably wholesome TS product that had been successful for years, because they only had trash inventory left that no one wanted to buy at their exorbitant rates (and excruciatingly high MF equal to platinum inventory), to a smoke and mirrors fake overlay points system.

you could likely paint hgvc with that same brush (and dri, and hyatt, and hicv, etc etc)....and they all appear to be doing just fine in comparison.

the industry continues to set new records in sales year in and year out, so for a single company who most people would consider to be at the top of the heap with a household moniker as strong as marriotts to fall off the gravy train is pretty shocking!
 
you could likely paint hgvc with that same brush (and dri, and hyatt, and hicv, etc etc)....and they all appear to be doing just fine in comparison.

the industry continues to set new records in sales year in and year out, so for a single company who most people would consider to be at the top of the heap with a household moniker as strong as marriotts to fall off the gravy train is pretty shocking!
I know nothing in detail about those systems and whether they followed the same path. MVC's trajectory with this fake points overlay has been discussed since its introduction in 2010.
 
you could likely paint hgvc with that same brush (and dri, and hyatt, and hicv, etc etc)....and they all appear to be doing just fine in comparison.

the industry continues to set new records in sales year in and year out, so for a single company who most people would consider to be at the top of the heap with a household moniker as strong as marriotts to fall off the gravy train is pretty shocking!
I think it's more about what MVC isn't doing that HGVC and others are. MVC decided to really forget about the "lower income" customers and decided to focus on the premium market. They really don't have an entry-level product anymore, unlike HGVC and others. Listen to the conference call and you'll hear the disdain the (now former) CEO has for the lower-income customers at the two Sheraton properties in Orlando.

The closest analogy I can think of is if United Airlines decided to rip out the economy seats in their planes and decided only to sell United First seats. Their revenue per seat sold may go up, but overall revenue undoubtedly would go down as potential customers go to American and Delta who would have the product at the right price-point.

The pain isn't over this quarter. It is likely to continue until they at least get new management in place to stabilize things. My guess is the new CEO (when they find a permanent one) will come in and the company will take a big bath (i.e., write downs) to set up a future where they look cleaner.
 
I think it's more about what MVC isn't doing that HGVC and others are. MVC decided to really forget about the "lower income" customers and decided to focus on the premium market. They really don't have an entry-level product anymore, unlike HGVC and others. Listen to the conference call and you'll hear the disdain the (now former) CEO has for the lower-income customers at the two Sheraton properties in Orlando.

The closest analogy I can think of is if United Airlines decided to rip out the economy seats in their planes and decided only to sell United First seats. Their revenue per seat sold may go up, but overall revenue undoubtedly would go down as potential customers go to American and Delta who would have the product at the right price-point.

The pain isn't over this quarter. It is likely to continue until they at least get new management in place to stabilize things. My guess is the new CEO (when they find a permanent one) will come in and the company will take a big bath (i.e., write downs) to set up a future where they look cleaner.
Plus the Marriotts and Sheratons in Orlando simply aren’t that exclusive like some of the other MVC properties. All of them can be rented on 3rd party sites between $100-200 a night. The sell of an Orlando timeshare isn’t that great with so much cheap inventory.

Maui sales have still been hit from the wildfires and MVC is very concentrated in Kanapali. Hilton doesn’t have the same kind of exposure there.

Since Orlando is struggling, makes me wonder if we start seeing reports of MVC struggling in Vegas next.
 
Plus the Marriotts and Sheratons in Orlando simply aren’t that exclusive like some of the other MVC properties. All of them can be rented on 3rd party sites between $100-200 a night. The sell of an Orlando timeshare isn’t that great with so much cheap inventory.

Maui sales have still been hit from the wildfires and MVC is very concentrated in Kanapali. Hilton doesn’t have the same kind of exposure there.

Since Orlando is struggling, makes me wonder if we start seeing reports of MVC struggling in Vegas next.
MVC doesn't have as large a footprint in Vegas - that is pretty much HGVC territory.

And yes, Orlando is much more affordable, but that also means the average customer there is likely to have a smaller budget than the one on Maui. What is the smallest points Abound points package MVC will sell? 1500 points for $25k+? I think we're routinely seeing HGVC victims customers coming here and reporting that they've spent as little as $7k and are looking to back out of the deal. I know MVC layers on incentives to drop the price down, but I'd still say there is no entry level product here.

When they first rolled out Abound we were told (at a Sheraton sales office) that they were no longer selling weeks or Flex packages - it was all Abound (the exception was Lagunamar). But it seems to have shifted, and we've been offered our choice of a week or Flex points at two Westin locations in the past year.
 
MVC doesn't have as large a footprint in Vegas - that is pretty much HGVC territory.

And yes, Orlando is much more affordable, but that also means the average customer there is likely to have a smaller budget than the one on Maui. What is the smallest points Abound points package MVC will sell? 1500 points for $25k+? I think we're routinely seeing HGVC victims customers coming here and reporting that they've spent as little as $7k and are looking to back out of the deal. I know MVC layers on incentives to drop the price down, but I'd still say there is no entry level product here.

When they first rolled out Abound we were told (at a Sheraton sales office) that they were no longer selling weeks or Flex packages - it was all Abound (the exception was Lagunamar). But it seems to have shifted, and we've been offered our choice of a week or Flex points at two Westin locations in the past year.
When they (supposedly) stopped selling Flex, I wondered about the mechanics of that. I'm not sure it's possible for them to put Westin or Sheraton Flex into the Abound trust – it's a real estate trust and I don't think it can hold fractional interests in another trust, but I could be wrong. I think they'd have to get the underlying weeks out of the Flex trust first – and I'm not sure if they can do that. They've sold interests in those trusts and I doubt they're allowed to remove weeks once they've gone into one of the trusts. So when they stopped selling Flex, what did they do with all of that inventory?

So I think they just put those Westin and Sheraton Flex trusts aside for a while and probably did their best to rent that inventory for cash or whatever through the Marriott Hotel platform, perhaps using some of it for Encore packages and the like. Now they're hungry enough that they are selling it again. I think they'll even sell you a deeded week if they happen to have any inventory that hasn't been committed to one of the trusts. Of course, the price won't be anything you will like...
 
When they (supposedly) stopped selling Flex, I wondered about the mechanics of that. I'm not sure it's possible for them to put Westin or Sheraton Flex into the Abound trust – it's a real estate trust and I don't think it can hold fractional interests in another trust, but I could be wrong. I think they'd have to get the underlying weeks out of the Flex trust first – and I'm not sure if they can do that. They've sold interests in those trusts and I doubt they're allowed to remove weeks once they've gone into one of the trusts. So when they stopped selling Flex, what did they do with all of that inventory?

So I think they just put those Westin and Sheraton Flex trusts aside for a while and probably did their best to rent that inventory for cash or whatever through the Marriott Hotel platform, perhaps using some of it for Encore packages and the like. Now they're hungry enough that they are selling it again. I think they'll even sell you a deeded week if they happen to have any inventory that hasn't been committed to one of the trusts. Of course, the price won't be anything you will like...
Marriott has been putting Westin and Sheraton deeded weeks into the Abound trust. They still convey Vistana Beach Club to Sheraton Flex and I think they still have lots of unsold Sheraton Flex and the re-acquisition rate on Sheraton Flex is also very high due to foreclosures. They still sell Sheraton Flex in Orlando and Myrtle Beach. I don't know if they sell it at the other Sheraton properties. I think Westin Flex has mostly stopped being sold. Though if you ask for it I suspect they have something they can sell. They just don't push it anymore.
 
Marriott has been putting Westin and Sheraton deeded weeks into the Abound trust. They still convey Vistana Beach Club to Sheraton Flex and I think they still have lots of unsold Sheraton Flex and the re-acquisition rate on Sheraton Flex is also very high due to foreclosures. They still sell Sheraton Flex in Orlando and Myrtle Beach. I don't know if they sell it at the other Sheraton properties. I think Westin Flex has mostly stopped being sold. Though if you ask for it I suspect they have something they can sell. They just don't push it anymore.
I'm a little surprised they are still adding to Sheraton Flex, even with low quality VBC weeks. I'd think they'd put those into Abound as a cheap source of new inventory. Maybe they see Sheraton Flex as something akin to an entry level product they can sell in Florida, as they are apparently doing. It's more downmarket than Abound, maybe.

Am i wrong in thinking that once they put a deeded week into one of the trusts, they can never take it out again? And that the Abound Trust probably can't own shares of another trust product (like a nested trust inside another trust... I think the mechanics of that are probably beyond anything their IT could handle?)

If MVC (and Vistana/Starwood before them) are smart, they only add deeds to the trust as they need more points inventory to sell. It doesn't seem as if it would make a lot of sense to permanently commit deeds to a trust before you actually needed to have them there – you'd be throwing away all your future options to do something different with those deeds if things change. Of course, they also need to consider the demand for inventory at various properties and have to try to keep up with that demand by adding deeds that match with demand, at least to a point.

I'm curious about how they manage all of that and their decision-making process around when they add things to the various trusts. I imagine it's secret sauce they're not likely to reveal.
 
I'm curious about how they manage all of that and their decision-making process around when they add things to the various trusts. I imagine it's secret sauce they're not likely to reveal.
We don't see the specifics, so don't know. They have the network operator role across all their exchanges and the right to forecast demand and then add inventory to where they feel it needs to go. That also means that they can shuffle inventory around as actual demand changes from the forecast and to meet their financial objectives. Whether this extends to taking inventory that is in one of the Trusts and moving it elsewhere is not clear, I suspect they have access to enough inventory not to have to go to that.

It would be sensible if they used the various waitlist and request systems as an input into their forecasting processes to help reduce the forecasting errors, but not having a waitlist process in the MVC weeks reservation system may hamper that a lot.

I still can't understand the business logic of offering decent shoulder season weeks via II accom certs 6 months ahead for 30% of maint fees, and even getaways at less than 50% of maint fees 3-4months ahead.

Perhaps its time for a more lightweight product along the lines of the vacation clubs that effectively have a pay for use system or you buy a set amount of points for use over a set period. They might do well getting into the game of renting club points in some way as a way for existing owners to top up their points needed, I use Encore packages to do this.

Without understanding how their current, and possible future, customers respond to the various products we're all guessing based on out own relatively narrow perspective, but at least TUG helps us see some of the other perspectives.
 
They pivoted from a reasonably wholesome TS product that had been successful for years, because they only had trash inventory left that no one wanted to buy at their exorbitant rates (and excruciatingly high MF equal to platinum inventory), to a smoke and mirrors fake overlay points system. The have been trying to sell the dream of a Hawaii vacation to people in a trust that is filled with low season trash (Myrtle Beach) weeks. Per the recent report, they have focused on owners who know the system and its limitations. The rise of the internet and social media has resulted in a flood of information to those that buy this garbage and rescind, or refuse to buy at all. They are running out of lemmings.
I couldn't agree more.
they continue to hide the decline in sales with increased profits from management fees, which increased MF, and makes it harder to sell
otoh, there is no "hiding" here. Hide from whom? Those are 2 different things. THey are easily parsed. They are valued by different types of investors. The dynamic of "raise MF" being good for mgmt profit but bad for new sales is prob over the heads of some of these Wall St analysts. But you know "Sell-Side" analysts are too busy selling to focus on getting much right. I read the transcript. The analyst basically said "All of us have never heard of Redweek." How's that for ignoring publicly-avail info!
 
Last edited:
We were offered to buy some additional Westin Flex during a recent stay at WKV, so they are still offering it. We declined their offer.
I just don't know if they openly offer it to new buyers. It seems new buyers are pushed Abound Trust Points unless they are at a Sheraton sales center that still sells Sheraton Flex.
 
I'm a little surprised they are still adding to Sheraton Flex, even with low quality VBC weeks. I'd think they'd put those into Abound as a cheap source of new inventory. Maybe they see Sheraton Flex as something akin to an entry level product they can sell in Florida, as they are apparently doing. It's more downmarket than Abound, maybe.

Am i wrong in thinking that once they put a deeded week into one of the trusts, they can never take it out again? And that the Abound Trust probably can't own shares of another trust product (like a nested trust inside another trust... I think the mechanics of that are probably beyond anything their IT could handle?)

If MVC (and Vistana/Starwood before them) are smart, they only add deeds to the trust as they need more points inventory to sell. It doesn't seem as if it would make a lot of sense to permanently commit deeds to a trust before you actually needed to have them there – you'd be throwing away all your future options to do something different with those deeds if things change. Of course, they also need to consider the demand for inventory at various properties and have to try to keep up with that demand by adding deeds that match with demand, at least to a point.

I'm curious about how they manage all of that and their decision-making process around when they add things to the various trusts. I imagine it's secret sauce they're not likely to reveal.
As far as I know the only Vistana Beach Club weeks going to the Sheraton Flex trust is stuff they take back via deed back and the odd maintenance fee foreclosure. It isn't a long term plan for the Sheraton Flex trust. I think they just want to avoid unbranded properties in the Abound trust. I think much of the unsold Sheraton Flex inventory is from the Sheraton Kauai Resort conveyance.

I think they can technically remove weeks from a trust. We see where Wyndham is going to be doing that for properties they are closing. That said, it probably isn't easy nor necessary. There are also costs to doing so. If they remove inventory from a trust, they can't let the trust fall below the number of points sold or they would need to replace it with something else. I think they would also get into trouble if they removed desirable inventory and replace it with undesirable stuff.
 
When they (supposedly) stopped selling Flex, I wondered about the mechanics of that. I'm not sure it's possible for them to put Westin or Sheraton Flex into the Abound trust – it's a real estate trust and I don't think it can hold fractional interests in another trust, but I could be wrong. I think they'd have to get the underlying weeks out of the Flex trust first – and I'm not sure if they can do that. They've sold interests in those trusts and I doubt they're allowed to remove weeks once they've gone into one of the trusts. So when they stopped selling Flex, what did they do with all of that inventory?

So I think they just put those Westin and Sheraton Flex trusts aside for a while and probably did their best to rent that inventory for cash or whatever through the Marriott Hotel platform, perhaps using some of it for Encore packages and the like. Now they're hungry enough that they are selling it again. I think they'll even sell you a deeded week if they happen to have any inventory that hasn't been committed to one of the trusts. Of course, the price won't be anything you will like...
I think the mechanics would have to be that they remove the week from the relevant Flex trust and then convey into Abound trust.

Just for fun I pulled up the original Westin Flex document I have. I’m not a lawyer - so take this for what it is worth. Adding is pretty straightforward, but it looks like the bar for removing weeks from the trust is fairly high.

IMG_7819.jpeg

IMG_7820.jpeg

IMG_7821.jpeg
 
We were offered to buy some additional Westin Flex during a recent stay at WKV, so they are still offering it. We declined their offer.
We were offered WFlex at Nanea this summer. It was part of their first pitch. I imagine if we didn’t already own Flex that this would have been brought up.
 
As far as I know the only Vistana Beach Club weeks going to the Sheraton Flex trust is stuff they take back via deed back and the odd maintenance fee foreclosure. It isn't a long term plan for the Sheraton Flex trust. I think they just want to avoid unbranded properties in the Abound trust. I think much of the unsold Sheraton Flex inventory is from the Sheraton Kauai Resort conveyance.

I think they can technically remove weeks from a trust. We see where Wyndham is going to be doing that for properties they are closing. That said, it probably isn't easy nor necessary. There are also costs to doing so. If they remove inventory from a trust, they can't let the trust fall below the number of points sold or they would need to replace it with something else. I think they would also get into trouble if they removed desirable inventory and replace it with undesirable stuff.
Completely agree with you on the removal aspects.

I’ll just point out that they also get inventory from people turning in their Flex product or ROFR (in the case of WFlex). It doesn’t always have to be adding new properties to the trust.

I’ve wondered why they never offered existing Flex owners the option to convert into Abound directly (so they would own Abound instead of Flex), rather than the clunky election process. To me that would take some time, but be best in the long run.
 
I think the mechanics would have to be that they remove the week from the relevant Flex trust and then convey into Abound trust.

Just for fun I pulled up the original Westin Flex document I have. I’m not a lawyer - so take this for what it is worth. Adding is pretty straightforward, but it looks like the bar for removing weeks from the trust is fairly high.

View attachment 118159
View attachment 118160
View attachment 118161
If I read that correctly, it essentially says that they can remove deeds from the trust if ⅔ of the "voting interests" agree to do so. But since MVC controls all the votes, I think, maybe that is a given. But it sounds like they'd also need court approval, so this is not something that would happen routinely.

Or would they actually have to have all of the Flex owners vote before they could remove something? That has never happened before and I'm pretty sure they make decisions about the trust without the need to consult owners, on anything. But if I'm reading correctly, they couldn't just remove weeks from Westin (or Sheraton) Flex and put them into Abound; they'd need a court to approve it and I would think we'd hear about that, it would presumably involve a public proceeding.

So I suspect that Westin and Sheraton Flex don't impact Abound and when they put stuff in those trusts, it's essentially a one-way street, those deeds will never come out absent a big casualty event or something which renders a property permanently uninhabitable.

Thanks for digging up the trust language!
 
Completely agree with you on the removal aspects.

I’ll just point out that they also get inventory from people turning in their Flex product or ROFR (in the case of WFlex). It doesn’t always have to be adding new properties to the trust.

I’ve wondered why they never offered existing Flex owners the option to convert into Abound directly (so they would own Abound instead of Flex), rather than the clunky election process. To me that would take some time, but be best in the long run.
In all the MANY owner updates I've attended, they've never offered to take back my Westin Flex in order to sell me Abound points. They've offered to take back every single one of my deeded weeks. That tells me that they really don't want Flex inventory – there's probably nothing they can do with it other than sell it as Flex. They DO want deeded weeks, because that's where the real value exists.
 
The big question, is it the lack of a lower tier product that is preventing MVW sales growth? The other companies like Hilton and Wyndham have that. Did Marriott try to go to high end with their product pricing and maintenance fees? It isn't like Hilgon Vacation Club (former Diamond) points are all that cheap. They even have high maintenance fees like most of the trust products seem to have.

It should also be noted, it isn't like the house is completely on fire. They are still selling timeshare interests and selling lots of them. They just sold 4% less than last year. That is something Wall Street doesn't like to see. Their loss was mostly on paper. Perhaps there are some other underlying issues going on, but it isn't like bankruptcy is pending or we won't be able to go to the resorts. It is the CEOs job to increase growth and share price. He failed at that and was shown the door. But we still have beautiful resorts that we can visit and that.
 
Top