I'm a little surprised they are still adding to Sheraton Flex, even with low quality VBC weeks. I'd think they'd put those into Abound as a cheap source of new inventory. Maybe they see Sheraton Flex as something akin to an entry level product they can sell in Florida, as they are apparently doing. It's more downmarket than Abound, maybe.
Am i wrong in thinking that once they put a deeded week into one of the trusts, they can never take it out again? And that the Abound Trust probably can't own shares of another trust product (like a nested trust inside another trust... I think the mechanics of that are probably beyond anything their IT could handle?)
If MVC (and Vistana/Starwood before them) are smart, they only add deeds to the trust as they need more points inventory to sell. It doesn't seem as if it would make a lot of sense to permanently commit deeds to a trust before you actually needed to have them there – you'd be throwing away all your future options to do something different with those deeds if things change. Of course, they also need to consider the demand for inventory at various properties and have to try to keep up with that demand by adding deeds that match with demand, at least to a point.
I'm curious about how they manage all of that and their decision-making process around when they add things to the various trusts. I imagine it's secret sauce they're not likely to reveal.