If you were starting from scratch, what would be your assessment of the best long-term value? Would it be points or resale weeks? What resales would have the best long-term value in use? What is the best defensive position from rising fees? What is the best avenue to ensure access to the reservations you want?
There is lots of experience here but times and options have and are changing for us. Our timeshare program has and continues to change. Satisfying VAC shareholders and timeshare interest holders is a challenge if not a conflict.
How do you define value?
Are you talking strictly money, or does ease of booking and getting exactly what you want play into value?
Fees for everything in the universe are going to rise (hopefully your paycheck does too).
There is no guarantee that you will get the reservation that you want 100% of the time- be it booking your home resort, using points or exchanging on II or skipping ownership and renting. Learning exactly how and when to book will increase you chances of satisfaction.
I own an enrolled lockoff week (purchased direct 15 years ago) and some points.
The best monetary value for my week is to lock off and exchange on II to other MVC with no exchange fee- 2 weeks of vacation for my maintence fee (about $1900) and abound club fee ($240). So I get 14 nights for $2300 ($165/ night) (not counting initial investment which was so long ago I feel we have made up for it).
But the maintenance fees do increase, and I have to invest time and effort to get the exchanges and there is no guarantee on view with an II exchange.
Some times something else is more valuable to us than cost- we might want a view, or a different number of nights. In those cases having points is great.
If you are just starting out a resale lockoff bought inexpensively might be the way to go. If you learn how to use II well even with paying exchange fees when you factor in the low initial investment that can give a good monetary value. But you have to be able accept the restriction- no view choice, booking weeks, dealing with II.
I don’t think there is one answer to your query- it’s individual.