- Joined
- Jul 19, 2007
- Messages
- 7,139
- Reaction score
- 1,909
- Location
- Carlsbad, CA
- Resorts Owned
- Marriott: Maui Ocean Club Lahaina Villas (3BRx5), Ko Olina, Shadow Ridge II, Willow Ridge, Aruba Ocean Club, DC Points HGVC: Flamingo, Sea World, I-Drive, Starwood Bella (x4), SDO, TradeWinds, Worldmark
I don't think there can be any doubt that spinning off the timeshare division was a great move for Marriott and its stockholders.
Prior to the spin-off Marriott was valued at approx $10B -- this is combined for the hotel company and the timeshare company.
Right now, Marriott (the hotel company) is valued at approx $12B and the timeshare company is valued at $900M.
Granted, the overall market has improved in the last six months, but it also appears that Marriott just wasn't getting any enterprise value for the timeshare organization -- and arguably the new accounting rules (that require all that debt and all those notes receivable to be on the balance sheet) would just confuse the stockholder who wants to own a hotel company.
So it appears to be an excellent move for Marriott to spin out VAC. Time will tell if it was good for the ownership, but it certainly looks good for the stockholders. And it must be nice to not be answering questions during the quarterly conference call about the timeshare division.
Best,
Greg
Prior to the spin-off Marriott was valued at approx $10B -- this is combined for the hotel company and the timeshare company.
Right now, Marriott (the hotel company) is valued at approx $12B and the timeshare company is valued at $900M.
Granted, the overall market has improved in the last six months, but it also appears that Marriott just wasn't getting any enterprise value for the timeshare organization -- and arguably the new accounting rules (that require all that debt and all those notes receivable to be on the balance sheet) would just confuse the stockholder who wants to own a hotel company.
So it appears to be an excellent move for Marriott to spin out VAC. Time will tell if it was good for the ownership, but it certainly looks good for the stockholders. And it must be nice to not be answering questions during the quarterly conference call about the timeshare division.
Best,
Greg
Last edited: