csudell
TUG Member
please forgive me as I'm sure this has been discussed before but I couldnt locate it.
would I be correct that with II the trade is based on the number of weeks and not the "quality."
for example, I am guessing I can not deposit my 2009 week and my 2010 week to get something bigger or "better" elsewhere.
again, thanks
would I be correct that with II the trade is based on the number of weeks and not the "quality."
for example, I am guessing I can not deposit my 2009 week and my 2010 week to get something bigger or "better" elsewhere.
again, thanks