Ski-Dad
TUG Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2019
- Messages
- 580
- Reaction score
- 487
- Location
- East Coast - Canada
- Resorts Owned
-
Sheraton Desert Oasis
Marriott Grande Vista - Florida Club
Grandview LV - Vacation Villages
I am toying with adding an HRC unit to my portfolio to add some variety. If I proceed, I would be looking for a Pinon Pointe 2 bedroom annual given its lower MF. This would be an easier decision, but for the recent II value downgrade, but this is likely still of interest.
I have read the recommendations regarding buying only Platinum or Diamond for their superior points to MF ratio, but I am questioning the #s. In my mind the savings ought to be enough to cover the additional purchase price amortized over 8 - 10 years without factoring in the time value of $$. Here is my mental process:
Pinon Point 2 bedroom 2024 MF = $1657
MF per point:
Diamond 2200 = $0.75
Platinum 2000 = $0.83
Gold 1880 = $0.88
Comparing the Diamond ratio to the Gold, the Gold unit owner is paying $247 more in MF for their 1880 based on the Diamond Cost of $0.75/point.
Comparing the Platinum ratio to the Gold, the Gold unit owner is paying $97 more in MF for their 1880 based on the Platinum Cost of $0.83/point.
Closing costs aside, the prices I am seeing and reading about seem to be:
Diamond $7-8K
Plat $4-6 K
Gold $2-3K
The MF savings doesn't seem to support the price differentials. When looking at the total cost over 8 to 10 years, the Gold units represent better value.
Am I off base with my estimated purchase prices? What am I missing?
Is there an underlying assumption that these units hold their value; therefore, the differential cost of acquisition does not need to be amortized?
I have read the recommendations regarding buying only Platinum or Diamond for their superior points to MF ratio, but I am questioning the #s. In my mind the savings ought to be enough to cover the additional purchase price amortized over 8 - 10 years without factoring in the time value of $$. Here is my mental process:
Pinon Point 2 bedroom 2024 MF = $1657
MF per point:
Diamond 2200 = $0.75
Platinum 2000 = $0.83
Gold 1880 = $0.88
Comparing the Diamond ratio to the Gold, the Gold unit owner is paying $247 more in MF for their 1880 based on the Diamond Cost of $0.75/point.
Comparing the Platinum ratio to the Gold, the Gold unit owner is paying $97 more in MF for their 1880 based on the Platinum Cost of $0.83/point.
Closing costs aside, the prices I am seeing and reading about seem to be:
Diamond $7-8K
Plat $4-6 K
Gold $2-3K
The MF savings doesn't seem to support the price differentials. When looking at the total cost over 8 to 10 years, the Gold units represent better value.
Am I off base with my estimated purchase prices? What am I missing?
Is there an underlying assumption that these units hold their value; therefore, the differential cost of acquisition does not need to be amortized?
Last edited: