SueDonJ
Moderator
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2006
- Messages
- 16,829
- Reaction score
- 6,149
- Location
- Massachusetts and Hilton Head Island
- Resorts Owned
- Marriott Barony Beach and SurfWatch
I would love to know what they can legally do with the weeks with unpaid fees prior to foreclosure. I'm sure they are buried in the recorded documents somewhere. We know that the Interval getaways are excess inventory from people who have traded their weeks to Interval for other weeks. We also know that Marriott can rent the weeks that are traded for Reward Points. Can there be a "bucket" for unpaid maintenance fee? If not, the association should foreclose quickly and have an auction. I've occasionally seen posts here on TUG of reported scheduled auctions by the timeshare associations.
It sounds to me like they aren't moving these off the books fast enough. Marriott might grab them on ROFR, but who cares?
Is it possible that there is a line-item somewhere on the financials that shows money coming in through assn-owned units that sold that is offsetting the bad debts?
I think that based on the governing docs that I have for my resorts there's no question that MVW can assume rights to ownerships that are in arrears, no question that MVW does assume rights and responsibility for ownerships in foreclosure. The fact that MVW has petitioned for and been granted rights by several states, SC and FL that I know of, to perform non-judicial foreclosures (where judicial is otherwise indicated or mandated) points directly to the fact that MVW intends to streamline the foreclosure process.
I don't know if the HOA is empowered to foreclose on non-performing intervals - the only ones I know of were I believe actioned by MVW as the Developer/Manager.
I'm of two minds that MVW or the resort HOA's (where/if it's allowed) should be required to foreclose and assume responsibility for non-performing intervals. The shareholders would certainly object to MVW saddling itself with low-demand inventory that doesn't generate fees to cover its operation, as would the Owners permanently saddling themselves with such inventory. The fact is some Weeks simply do not pay for themselves and will not be re-owned easily, and unless it's a requirement in the governing docs it's understandable why MVW and/or the HOA's are reluctant to assume them.
As for the offsets showing in the Operating Budgets it's possible that they're included as a component of a line item rather than as an individual line item, and that getting to them would require an audit or a review of the mandated independent audits that are already routinely performed. I don't know exactly how it works but it being a component is what makes sense to me.