FractionalTraveler
TUG Member
Credit scores are used by the insurance companies as a risk score. They use this to determine the likelihood of someone filing a claim. The lower the score the more likely someone will file a claim or a small claim where someone with a high score is more likely just to pay cash instead of file a small claim. It has nothing to do with how the person pays the premium.
That's interesting. I have been using Liberty Mutual Insurance for my cars for years and have never been told that my credit was part of the formula used to determine my rates. I have always been told it was determined from my gender, age, location, type of car, driving record, and industry data regarding repairs on similar vehicles involved in accidents. I will definitely ask about this next time I'm up for renewal. Thanks.
The difference here is the cost of a home then and now. When my parents (only one generation before mine) bought their home, it cost less than $18,000. They are in their early 60s.That same home today is probably worth over $400K (not sure that incomes have gone up that much). So it isn't about being okay to borrower for a home, it is a necessity. Someone would have to go much of their life to save up enough cash to buy a home. Though people should be saving up larger down payments than many currently do today.
Don't disagree with the initial outlay but paying it back sooner rather than later is a definite plus.
I would rather see someone borrower to buy a car instead of lease. As leasing (unless for a tax write-off) is usually a worse financial move.
I agree.
This is definitely true of small end purchase, TVs, appliances, electronics, perhaps even cars. Not sure if a house is in that same category.
True but you can also purchase a home with other collateral that is not a loan product (i.e. Investments, Intellectual Property, Royalties, Trusts, etc.)