- Joined
- Jan 10, 2010
- Messages
- 6,808
- Reaction score
- 4,392
- Location
- Fairfax County, Virginia
- Resorts Owned
- Wyndham VIPF & PresRes, HVC/DRI (Gold), Quarter House (4), Resort on Cocoa Beach (2), HGVC Tuscany Village, HGVC South Beach, HGVC Parc Soleil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I grow more and more frustrated at the responsible exit website on a daily basis....As I've said before about these sorts of warnings:
If they had a decent take-back program to let members
divest themselves, these fraudsters would disappear.
Instead, they make it difficult for owners to unburden
themselves, and thus create an eco-system for them.
100% agree it is all PR BS. HGV’s “help” is to direct owners of dog weeks to resale companies charging fees knowing full well themselves that the weeks will never sell. Even HGV doesn’t want them for free, heck they don’t even want them if the owner paid them $1,000 to take them.it just looks so good from a PR perspective as if the industry is happy to work with owners, perhaps i was just too naive at the start to believe that was the goal.
I think the lawsuits will end. Those seem to be a product of Mike Flasky, the former CEO of Diamond. I watched an interview that he did and he seemed to indicate that the big brands don't want to go down the litigation route. HGV will see any existing lawsuits through, but after that we probably won't see any more. I think Hilton's biggest issue is the lack of a trust points product. It doesn't give them an easy outlet for many of the weeks people want to get rid of. At least if they had a trust points product, like Marriott, Vistana, Wyndham and even Diamond, then they can just convey deeded back weeks to the trust and sell them as points.100% agree it is all PR BS. HGV’s “help” is to direct owners of dog weeks to resale companies charging fees knowing full well themselves that the weeks will never sell. Even HGV doesn’t want them for free, heck they don’t even want them if the owner paid them $1,000 to take them.
Instead of spending big bucks paying lawyers to sue exit companies they should think about using those same dollars to establish a program that really helps owners that isn’t just lip service.
They will fix the junk they sold you if you spend another $20,000.HGV does have an outlet for the low value/high MF weeks - they'll let you trade it in to buy a high value/low MF week that they will then take back from you for no extra cost other than the upgrade.![]()
How would they control the rental market? In an open market, rental prices are based on supply and demand; no one "sets" a rental price -- it is the market that determines what people will agree to pay for a certain rental. On the other side of that, maintenance fees are based on the actual cost of running and maintaining the property.Or just if they controlled the rental market so that renting a given week is always 20% more than the MFs for that week.
This has been done on a small scale at a single individual resort. There was a resort where resale deeds were worth less than zero, and a guy actually would take the deeds from people with a payment. He would then pay the MFs and list the week on AirBnB and VRBO (this legacy resort had no policy regarding this). Over time, he wound up owning something like half the resort (he had half the deeds), had voting interest, and decided to have a special assessment to fix the place up substantially, which resulted in more owners exiting. The exiting owners paid him to take it, essentially.Or just if they controlled the rental market so that renting a given week is always 20% more than the MFs for that week.
One of the benefits and issues timeshares have is the "owners" lack sufficient votes to actually manage the property cost effectively. On the plus side, we just pay a few bucks extra and someone else manages all the hassles of "actually owning the property," but how much more is this actually worth?This has been done on a small scale at a single individual resort. There was a resort where resale deeds were worth less than zero, and a guy actually would take the deeds from people with a payment. He would then pay the MFs and list the week on AirBnB and VRBO (this legacy resort had no policy regarding this). Over time, he wound up owning something like half the resort (he had half the deeds), had voting interest, and decided to have a special assessment to fix the place up substantially, which resulted in more owners exiting. The exiting owners paid him to take it, essentially.
One of the benefits and issues timeshares have is the "owners" lack sufficient votes to actually manage the property cost effectively. On the plus side, we just pay a few bucks extra and someone else manages all the hassles of "actually owning the property," but how much more is this actually worth?
If you multiple the MF by 52 and the number of units, it's quite a sum of money annually.
Maybe we should set up an opportunity fund or better yet, just a management company. The challenge would be getting control of the Boards to get a foot in the door.
Control=Power=$$$ (sometimes)
it just looks so good from a PR perspective as if the industry is happy to work with owners, perhaps i was just too naive at the start to believe that was the goal.
contact resale@hgvc.comI am not aware of any take back program for HGVC. No fees for Vistana or Marriott feedbacks and are pretty much carte blanche.
I think the main issue with HGVC is that the deeds people would want to give back are the low season weeks with high MF to point ratios. These may have $0 or even negative values. Think off season studio ms in Orlando. They had a hard enough time selling them the first time. Without a trust bases product they are forced to try and resell that week.