• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 31st anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

EEOC Sues Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation and Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. for Religious Discrimination, May 7, 2025

Sounds like a good case based upon the facts alleged.
 
have to say for all the things someone would sue a timeshare system for, that wasnt on my bingo card.
 
While there are a lot of frivolous religious claims I've seen made in the past, this one seems like there'd be no real way around them getting in trouble. Is it really an undue burden to have someone you could schedule Sundays when many more religious people would want off in exchange for the Saturdays off? This is more IMHO due to probable horrible scheduling like I used to get way back when I worked for Best Buy. They just don't want to have fixed scheduling, but grab employees randomly each week. I always hated that, and always figured if you couldn't figure out fixed schedules then you were just bad at running a business. It's not like these places are having unexpected hours - they have the same hours they're open for years at a time. I have yet to see (granted, not MVC) packed presentation locations - and so maybe you occasionally have to offer someone a Monday presentation rather than a Sat one or something IDK...
 
While there are a lot of frivolous religious claims I've seen made in the past, this one seems like there'd be no real way around them getting in trouble. Is it really an undue burden to have someone you could schedule Sundays when many more religious people would want off in exchange for the Saturdays off? This is more IMHO due to probable horrible scheduling like I used to get way back when I worked for Best Buy. They just don't want to have fixed scheduling, but grab employees randomly each week. I always hated that, and always figured if you couldn't figure out fixed schedules then you were just bad at running a business. It's not like these places are having unexpected hours - they have the same hours they're open for years at a time. I have yet to see (granted, not MVC) packed presentation locations - and so maybe you occasionally have to offer someone a Monday presentation rather than a Sat one or something IDK...
Also, I personally have never been offered a Saturday presentation. With FRI-SAT-SUN being the usual check in days, these would seem to be the worst time to get people in. Being that they accommodated them previously and then stopped when management changed, MVWC seems to be facing a very uphill battle.
 
I'm not so sure about this...likely depends on the terms of employment when hired. And this is a role that cannot be reasonably expected to NOT work on a specific weekend day. She likely should have found a different place of employment that was not open on Saturdays. Just because they tried to be accommodating in the past doesn't change that.

If I were still a every-week-church-attending-Catholic, I sure wouldn't take a job at a restaurant that specializes in Sunday brunch. :shrug:
 
I'm not so sure about this...likely depends on the terms of employment when hired. And this is a role that cannot be reasonably expected to NOT work on a specific weekend day. She likely should have found a different place of employment that was not open on Saturdays. Just because they tried to be accommodating in the past doesn't change that.

If I were still a every-week-church-attending-Catholic, I sure wouldn't take a job at a restaurant that specializes in Sunday brunch. :shrug:
Why not? You are not the sole employee there. So "every-week-church-attending-Catholic" can't work anywhere that happens to be open Sunday? Others could work the Sunday brunch.

Why can't a timeshare salesperson work Sunday-Friday? What is the burden on the employer if this particular employee doesn't work on Saturdays? "Terms of employment" cannot override federal employment law.

The only thing in your post that makes sense is that you are "not so sure about this." That is very obvious.
 
Last edited:
There was a June 2023 Supreme Court ruling on this. Though that was for a postal worker, but I understand the standard applies to all employers.
 
Years ago when I worked at a large Boston company our hours were strictly 8:20-4:30, M-F. The girl who sat at the desk in front of mine was Jewish and she was the only person I knew there who had a unique schedule - during the winter months when leaving at 4:30 would get her home to Brookline after dark, on Fridays she worked 7:30-3:30. She knew, though, that the concessions made for her would be rescinded if her work suffered. She was serious about it so it never was a problem.

I can’t imagine any company ignoring religion-based needs of good employees if concessions are possible. It’ll be interesting to learn, if we ever do, whether Marriott just blatantly became un-accommodating for no good reason, as the lawsuit seems to allege, or if something else was in play.
 
Deleted to remove specter of politics. My post was intended to simply provide insight.
 
Last edited:
Post voluntarily deleted to remove specter of political commentary. Post was intended to provide observation and insight based on my personal experience in this area of law and my personal experience working within the interagency process for the federal government.
 
Last edited:
Note that the EEOC left this plaintiff to fend for themselves, issuing only a "right to sue" letter. Again, the EEOC's bringing suit in the case that is the subject of this thread is not normal. I suspect the administration is trying to send a signal to MAR and missed the mark due to its likely ignorance that hurting the bottom line of MVW/MORI (both traded under VAC) won't touch MAR. I would not be surprised if many at MAR were delighting in the suspected confusion.
Methinks your conspiracy theory has run astray. And no, a RTS Letter is issued at the request of a claimant, it is not forced on the claimant by the reviewing agency. So in the instant case, the claimant must not have requested a RTSL and it was investigated by the EEOC after referral from the FL state agency.

Everything (other than the filing of the complaint) occurred prior to "the current administration" being elected. This case is most likely being handled by a career EEOC attorney that has not yet been purged.

10. Pursuant to the Worksharing Agreement between FCHR and the EEOC,
the Charge was duly-filed with the EEOC on or around July 18, 2023.
11. On or around July 11, 2024, the Charge was transferred to the EEOC
for processing.
18. On September 16, 2024, the EEOC issued a Notice of Conciliation
Failure to Marriott Vacations.


Aside from the wacky conspiracy theory, the complaint has a lot of detail on how sales works, which I presume will be of great interest to TUGGERS. I've started a separate thread to discuss those practices, as this thread will likely go off the rails and be shut down.
 
Methinks your conspiracy theory has run astray. And no, a RTS Letter is issued at the request of a claimant, it is not forced on the claimant by the reviewing agency. So in the instant case, the claimant must not have requested a RTSL and it was investigated by the EEOC after referral from the FL state agency.

Everything (other than the filing of the complaint) occurred prior to "the current administration" being elected. This case is most likely being handled by a career EEOC attorney that has not yet been purged.

10. Pursuant to the Worksharing Agreement between FCHR and the EEOC,
the Charge was duly-filed with the EEOC on or around July 18, 2023.
11. On or around July 11, 2024, the Charge was transferred to the EEOC
for processing.
18. On September 16, 2024, the EEOC issued a Notice of Conciliation
Failure to Marriott Vacations.


Aside from the wacky conspiracy theory, the complaint has a lot of detail on how sales works, which I presume will be of great interest to TUGGERS. I've started a separate thread to discuss those practices, as this thread will likely go off the rails and be shut down.
You clearly have never practiced this area of law, have never worked for the federal government and are wildly out of touch with what is going on in DC. Find one other case where the EEOC has filed a complaint like this, or don't. The EEOC action is the only thing that matters here. It is highly unusual and there is no way it was initiated by a career attorney without political direction.

To elaborate (not sure why I am even bothering), the current very open direction to the EEOC is "abandon race and gender claims and focus on religion." Part of greater agenda about which the administration is being fully transparent. Ask anyone you know with any connection to the administration (guessing nobody) and they will proudly own it.

And the "Marriott" target is perfect for the agenda they feel the people voted for. They believe society has focused too much on discrimination based on race and gender and not enough on discrimination based on religion, so they are making an example out of a company that recently said it valued diversity to highlight how they feel that religious freedom has been ignored by those who proclaim tolerance and respect for all.

I am making no judgment here and believe that all administrations select enforcement actions that are consistent with whatever they perceive their mandate to be.
 
Last edited:
Again, not sure why I am bothering, but a right to sue letter is issued as a matter of course when the EEOC does not initiate a case, which is what happens in virtually every case like this. The claimant does not have to request it and it is not forced on anyone. It is just routinely issued as part of the regulations implementing Title VII.
 
If anyone is interested in this topic, look up the Feb 6 2025 Executive Order with the title "Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias."
 
As moderator: No matter how much we want to attribute politics to *any* topic, the TUG Rules are clear: "Avoid posting about politics." All further political comments/posts and any further responses to political comments/posts will be deleted. Also, bringing MAR into the fray to shore up an opinion based only on politics isn't helpful considering that the EEOC charges only MVW and MORI, so let's leave MAR out of it until/unless the principals introduce it.

As a TUG participant like anyone else here: I agree with Brian, this wasn't something that was ever on my list of reasons to sue a timeshare company but still I'm interested to see where it goes. I want to know what allowances were made that granted concessions to the employee at one time, whether and what constraints were on those allowances, what was the particular "change in management" that the EEOC alleges is the reason the allowances were rescinded, and whatever else is in play. Do any of the legal eagles here have access to any directly-related filings?

{eta} Nevermind, I see it linked in @davidvel's other thread. Hmmmm.
 
Last edited:
You clearly have never practiced this area of law, have never worked for the federal government and are wildly out of touch with what is going on in DC. Find one other case where the EEOC has filed a complaint like this, or don't. The EEOC action is the only thing that matters here. It is highly unusual and there is no way it was initiated by a career attorney without political direction.

To elaborate (not sure why I am even bothering), the current very open direction to the EEOC is "abandon race and gender claims and focus on religion." Part of greater agenda about which the administration is being fully transparent. Ask anyone you know with any connection to the administration (guessing nobody) and they will proudly own it.

And the "Marriott" target is perfect for the agenda they feel the people voted for. They believe society has focused too much on discrimination based on race and gender and not enough on discrimination based on religion, so they are making an example out of a company that recently said it valued diversity by making it look like that company does not respect religion.
The facts of this case and filing make obvious that the train was rolling down the tracks toward a lawsuit almost 2 years ago, with the claimant having no private attorney. The EEOC was pursuing her claim long before the last quarter of 2024. She never retained an attorney to file a private suit. They are not going to abandon her and not file suit after MVC didn't settle.
 
The facts of this case and filing make obvious that the train was rolling down the tracks toward a lawsuit almost 2 years ago, with the claimant having no private attorney. The EEOC was pursuing her claim long before the last quarter of 2024. She never retained an attorney to file a private suit. They are not going to abandon her and not file suit after MVC didn't settle.
The EEOC has hundreds of these in the pipeline at any given time. They are very selective about those they act on.

[Moderator Note: Political content deleted.] <-- SueDonJ
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[...] Find one other case where the EEOC has filed a complaint like this, or don't. The EEOC action is the only thing that matters here. It is highly unusual [...]
I found "one." The list goes on ad nauseum, but here are just a few in the past few years, many before Nov. 2024.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kansas City, Kansas Community College2:2023mc00202Kansas District Court
03/14/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. PRC INDUSTRIES, INC. CORP3:2023cv00135Nevada District Court
03/28/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Thida Trimming, Inc.2:2023mc00039California Central District Court
03/29/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. J&M Industries, Inc.2:2023cv01100Louisiana Eastern District Court
03/30/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. T C Wheelers, Inc.1:2023cv00286New York Western District Court
03/30/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. DTG Las Vegas, LLC et al2:2023cv00510Nevada District Court
04/06/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, San Francisco District Office v. Security Industry Specialists, Inc.4:2023mc80112California Northern District Court
04/10/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Louisiana, Inc.2:2023cv01261Louisiana Eastern District Court
04/14/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pacific Culinary Group Inc. et al2:2023cv03018California Central District Court
04/21/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sunnybrook Educational Association, IEA-NEA1:2023cv02804Illinois Northern District Court
05/04/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Aged Artisans LLC1:2023cv00208Hawaii District Court
05/11/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Swami's 101 LLC et al3:2023cv00902California Southern District Court
05/17/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Red Barchetta LLC2:2023cv00008West Virginia Northern District Court
05/22/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. R & G Endeavors, Inc.0:2023cv01501Minnesota District Court
05/23/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. R & G Endeavors, Inc.0:2023cv01506Minnesota District Court
05/23/23​
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. HATZEL & BUEHLER, INC.3:2023cv03093New Jersey District Court
06/06/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hobe Sound OPCO, LLC et al6:2023cv01078Florida Middle District Court
06/08/23​
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. BHAKUNI2:2023cv02463Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
06/27/23​
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. BOB'S DISCOUNT FURNITURE, LLC2:2023cv02461Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
06/27/23​
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. HAJOCA CORPORATION2:2023cv02460Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
06/27/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Houcorp, Inc,9:2023cv80985Florida Southern District Court
06/30/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Houcorp, Inc,2:2023cv14191Florida Southern District Court
06/30/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tech Mahindra (Americas) Inc.6:2023cv06397New York Western District Court
07/14/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hooters of Louisiana, LLC et al2:2023cv02864Louisiana Eastern District Court
07/28/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Third Bench Holdings, LLC2:2023cv00659New Mexico District Court
08/09/23​
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. GMRI, INC.2:2023cv01448Pennsylvania Western District Court
08/14/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. KVP, LP et al2:2023cv01308Nevada District Court
08/24/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mariscos El Puerto, Inc. et al2:2023cv01309Nevada District Court
08/24/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mariscos El Puerto, Inc. et al2:2023cv01310Nevada District Court
08/24/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc. et al2:2023cv01307Nevada District Court
08/24/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Enterprise Leasing Company of Florida, LLC0:2023cv61744Florida Southern District Court
09/11/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Eastbox, LLC, et al.4:2023cv00814Texas Eastern District Court
09/13/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kanes Furniture, LLC8:2023cv02067Florida Middle District Court
09/13/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Len Stoler, Inc.1:2023cv02487Maryland District Court
09/13/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Erie Construction Mid-West LLC3:2023cv02060Texas Northern District Court
09/14/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Michael Sinclair, M.D.P.A. et al1:2023cv23547Florida Southern District Court
09/15/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. TA Dedicated, Inc. et al1:2023cv01802Ohio Northern District Court
09/15/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, et al5:2023cv00623West Virginia Southern District Court
09/19/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. 299 Madison Ave, L.L.C.1:2023cv08306New York Southern District Court
09/20/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Cedar Fair L.P. et al.3:2023cv01843Ohio Northern District Court
09/22/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. AMZ Manufacturing Co.1:2023cv01587Pennsylvania Middle District Court
09/25/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Asphalt Paving Systems, Inc.8:2023cv02169Florida Middle District Court
09/26/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Blackwell Security Services, Inc.1:2023cv14110Illinois Northern District Court
09/26/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Florida Care ALF of Amelia Island, Inc.3:2023cv01130Florida Middle District Court
09/26/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Paramount Healthcare Consultants LLC et al3:2023cv00359Texas Western District Court
09/26/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Telecommuting Institute, Inc.5:2023cv01210Texas Western District Court
09/27/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Alliance Ground International LLC1:2023cv14302Illinois Northern District Court
09/29/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Elaine's Pet Resorts, LP, et al1:2023cv01422California Eastern District Court
09/29/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Jacobson Memorial Hospital Care Center1:2023cv00192North Dakota District Court
09/29/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Meathead Movers Inc. et al2:2023cv08177California Central District Court
09/29/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Union Pacific Railroad Company0:2023cv03030Minnesota District Court
09/29/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Cambridge Transportation, Inc.0:2023mc00101Minnesota District Court
10/19/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Weis Markets, Inc.1:2023cv01767Pennsylvania Middle District Court
10/25/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. EchoPark Automotive, Inc.8:2023cv03326Maryland District Court
12/07/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. NICPA Central Auto Group, LLC. et al1:2023cv01541Texas Western District Court
12/20/23​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Gracious, LLC2:2024cv00418Louisiana Eastern District Court
02/16/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Farmacia Carimas3:2024mc00103Puerto Rico District Court
03/14/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sis-Bro, Inc.3:2024cv00968Illinois Southern District Court
03/28/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sheetz, Inc. et al1:2024cv01123Maryland District Court
04/17/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. All Day Medical Care Clinic, LLC1:2024cv01477Maryland District Court
05/21/24​
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. METROPOLITAN FOODS, INC.2:2024cv06384New Jersey District Court
05/23/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Nailor Industries of Texas, Inc.4:2024cv01990Texas Southern District Court
05/24/24​
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. EASTERN JANITORIAL SERVICES3:2024cv06474New Jersey District Court
05/28/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lone Star Overnight, LLC4:2024cv00477Texas Eastern District Court
05/28/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. LAS Hardwoods, Inc1:2024cv04899Illinois Northern District Court
06/13/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Garda CL Southeast, Inc.6:2024cv01145Florida Middle District Court
06/21/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pro Pallet, LLC1:2024cv01086Pennsylvania Middle District Court
07/02/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. X-Treme Tech Services, LLC2:2024cv01829Louisiana Eastern District Court
07/22/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Cotti Foods Corporation et al8:2024cv01668California Central District Court
07/31/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Alto Ingredients, Inc.1:2024cv01269Illinois Central District Court
08/05/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Techstyle, Inc. et al2:2024cv07239California Central District Court
08/26/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. TNNY Hotel, LLC (d/b/a &quot;The Ned NoMad&quot;) et al1:2024cv06487New York Southern District Court
08/28/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Epiq Food Hall Woodbridge, LLC et al1:2024cv01518Virginia Eastern District Court
08/29/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Smiths Detection Inc.1:2024cv02510Maryland District Court
08/29/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Federal Express Corporation0:2024cv03559Minnesota District Court
09/06/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Helia Healthcare of Salem, LLC3:2024cv02152Illinois Southern District Court
09/10/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Divine Boiling Group, LLC6:2024cv01711Florida Middle District Court
09/20/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Yas Caribe Inc. et al3:2024cv01449Puerto Rico District Court
09/23/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Results Companies7:2024cv00128Texas Northern District Court
09/24/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. DR Horton Inc.1:2024cv02757Maryland District Court
09/25/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Cloud Area Family YMCA0:2024cv03738Minnesota District Court
09/25/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Admiral Theatre, Inc.1:2024cv08989Illinois Northern District Court
09/26/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Heart of Texas Goodwill Industries, Inc.6:2024cv00498Texas Western District Court
09/26/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. AccentCare, Inc.3:2024cv01646Pennsylvania Middle District Court
09/27/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bigfoot Energy Services, LLC et al2:2024cv02361Louisiana Eastern District Court
09/27/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Minden Seafood, LLC, et al2:2024cv02360Louisiana Eastern District Court
09/27/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. ABC Phones of North Carolina, Inc.3:2024cv00444Nevada District Court
09/30/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. CASTLE HILLS MASTER ASSOCIATION INC et al4:2024cv00871Texas Eastern District Court
09/30/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Discount Auto Parts LLC et al9:2024cv81200Florida Southern District Court
09/30/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Garden City Jeep Chrysler Dodge, LLC et al2:2024cv06878New York Eastern District Court
09/30/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. KTG Hospitality, LLC, d/b/a Wall Street Grill1:2024cv07376New York Southern District Court
09/30/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kurt Bluemel, Inc.1:2024cv02816Maryland District Court
09/30/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lago Mar Properties, Inc.0:2024cv61812Florida Southern District Court
09/30/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Westminster Ingleside King Farm Presbyterian Retirement Communities, Inc.8:2024cv02811Maryland District Court
09/30/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sheetz, Inc. et al3:2024cv00231Pennsylvania Western District Court
10/04/24​
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. CAMDEN DEVELOPMENT, INC.1:2024mc00167District Of Columbia District Court
12/18/24​
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. EQUINOX HOLDINGS, INC.1:2024cv03597District Of Columbia District Court
12/23/24​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Federal Express Corporation1:2025cv00454New York Southern District Court
01/16/25​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC2:2025cv00137Louisiana Eastern District Court
01/17/25​
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. SUPPORT CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCATES2:2025cv00310Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
01/17/25​
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. SECURITY ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT, INC.1:2025cv00181District Of Columbia District Court
01/21/25​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Diamond Modern Furniture, LLC4:2025mc00116Texas Southern District Court
01/22/25​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Leopalace Guam Corporation1:2025cv00004Guam District Court
02/14/25​
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mauser Packaging Solutions2:2025mc00016Tennessee Western District Court
03/20/25​
 
Seriously? How many of those cases involved a single employee complaint based on religious discrimination against a Christian? ZERO. Look up EEOC statistics - they file suit in 0.2% of the complaints that go through the agency. Yes, 2/10 of 1 percent. Just keep telling yourself this is business as usual. It is of no import to me.
 
Last edited:
Seriously? How many of those cases involved a single employee complaint based on religious discrimination against a Christian? ZERO. Look up EEOC statistics - they file suit in 0.2% of the complaints that go through the agency. Yes, 2/10 of 1 percent. Just keep telling yourself this is business as usual. It is of no import to me.
Took me one minute to find these, 2023
 
Thank you. I stand corrected and am sending this on to those who crafted the Feb 6 2025 Executive Order. This discussion is an excellent example of a situation where someone on the Internet gave me new information. I thought I was immune to the disinformation, but I did not question the premise of the E.O., which certainly causes me to pause and reflect anew. Thanks to all for what was a productive discussion for me.
 
Last edited:
Seriously? How many of those cases involved a single employee complaint based on religious discrimination against a Christian? ZERO. Look up EEOC statistics - they file suit in 0.2% of the complaints that go through the agency. Yes, 2/10 of 1 percent. Just keep telling yourself this is business as usual. It is of no import to me.
ZERO? So you read every complaint? And you are citing a single complaint against Marriott for a claim filed before the current admin by an unrepresented person as your beacon of truth supporting your crazy thoughts? At least you factless conspiracy nutjobs are consistent. Looney ideological opinion first, reality never.
 
ZERO? So you read every complaint? And you are citing a single complaint against Marriott for a claim filed before the current admin by an unrepresented person as your beacon of truth supporting your crazy thoughts? At least you factless conspiracy nutjobs are consistent. Looney ideological opinion first, reality never.
See my response above. Nobody has ever called me a conspiracy nutjob, and I believe your readiness to throw that label out speaks volumes about you, none of which is positive. You strike me as one of those on here who is never willing to admit when you are wrong or have lept to an incorrect conclusion. If you search threads where we have both participated, you will find at least one where I corrected you, and rather than acknowledging it, you just bulldozed along into another thread. Of course I have received messages offline that some of the most prolific posters are those who one should ignore because their identity is wrapped in this site. I don't work that way and actually engage in discussion without any agenda.
 
I have spent a few hours on here today, and it has been, as always, fascinating. Before logging off, I am just following up on this thread. Responses to my correspondence have been interesting. I own my guilt in being a "secular lib" who never questioned recent assertions that the EEOC paid no attention to claims filed by Christians.

With that said, there are a lot of chess players in Washington, D.C.. Accordingly, I stand by my assertion that action decisions in all those cases where the EEOC initiates actual litigation based on the hundreds (thousands) of complaints that are in the pipeline at any given time are made by C-Schedulers and never by Career.
 
Top