My $0.02 worth...
I assume you’re just joking about using a trust or LLC and bailing if you don’t like your timeshare. Somewhere I read that Wyndham still requires an owner’s name associated with a trust. I’m not considering bailing from my timeshares but I have thought about putting them in a trust. Does anyone know how this is done? Pros/cons etc. --Ron
First, of course, you would have to
establish a legally valid trust. More often than not, this is a (revocable) living trust, in which you (as timeshare owner-to-be) are one (...maybe even the
only one) of the trustees. New deeds would have to be prepared and recorded thereafter in the new trust name. Many timeshare entities will ask for (i.e.,
demand to see) the first and last pages of your legally executed trust instrument, obviously including the notarized signature page, in order to be able to ascertain and verify to their own satisfaction that the trust even exists at all and is not just a fabrication of some "angle man's" imagination. Submission of bogus or fabricated trust documents would, of course, clearly constitute willful, outright (...and, to be clear, criminal) fraud. Btw, there is certainly no effective "avoidance of financial responsibility" by having a timeshare ownership in a revocable living trust name, but doing so might well greatly facilitate its' later disposition in the event of your untimely or unexpected demise (...and aren't we
all ultimately "exiting the picture" sooner or later?).
I would just summarily ignore questionable drivel "input" (a.k.a. "background noise"; e.g., post #4 above) from non-attorneys unwisely suggesting that timeshare ownership by a bogus LLC is even a viable option.
No resort paying any attention will ever acknowledge any such entity as a legitimate owner, so although it would be a (likely fraudulent, certainly futile) attempt to actively evade personal responsibility, you'd also likely never be allowed any actual access to or use of the facility as a nebulous "LLC", so what would even be the point of pursuing this particular (likely fraudulent, certainly futile) "bogus LLC name" route, just to later be completely denied any actual future access, occupancy or use at the facility?


