Ron2
TUG Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2012
- Messages
- 302
- Reaction score
- 14
- Location
- Pennsylvania
- Resorts Owned
- Bonnet Creek Resort and Wyndham CWA
Bonnet Creek HOA or Wyndham should be going out of pocket to cover one tower being closed. The same amount of points are chasing fewer units. Why should an owner at another resort have more competition for the reservation they want?
I agree that Wyndham should be contributing funds to cover the cost of refurbishing Tower 5 as well as all the other towers, not because non-owners have less access to Bonnet Creek but because Wyndham uses the resort to promote sales. As for the HOA paying more, we as BC owners are paying more to the tune of a 6.6% increase in maintenance fees for next year to cover the cost of refurbishing units every 5 years instead of every 6 years. This is all because of the excessive wear and tear caused by the high annual occupancy rate (93% according to Wyndham) and irresponsible folks who just don’t care if they damage things at the resort (most likely non-owners who don’t have a vested interest in Bonnet Creek).