Frank, if you'll go back and read my post again, you'll see that I said I only had an issue if the post had been copied verbatim without the permission of the author. You clarified that with your response. I also paid you a compliment when I said that if you had posted with the permission of the author, you had done a good thing.
Regarding my posting on the Morritt Owners Forum, immediately upon our becoming non-owners, I notified the moderator that we were no longer owners at Morritt's and I posted the same information on the Owners Forum. My access to the forum wasn't terminated, so I continued to read about events at the resort. Should I have continued to notify the moderator that I still had access to the Owners Forum? Perhaps. How many times am I required to do that? I suppose I rationalized that I wasn't harming anyone if I confined my activities to reading and if I avoided posting. I did post on that forum today, realizing that my access would probably be terminated immediately. As you know, that post was to inform another owner that, contrary to his belief, the information had indeed been posted on a public forum. I fully expected that post to result in the termination of my access privileges but, as you noted in your follow-on post, some information just needs to be made available.
Over the years, you and I have been on opposite sides on some issues and on the same side on others. I've always respected your views, even when they differed with mine. I regret that you took offense to my post because it was not my intent for the post to be interpreted as a personal attack on you.
