The Fantasy-Sports Non-Scandal - by Mark St. Amant/ Op-Ed Contributor/ The Opinion Pages/ International New York Times/ The New York Times/ nytimes.com
"LIKE many fantasy football players of a certain age, I began with an office league. It was the 1990s, when we tallied points with newspaper box scores, pens and scratch paper. Despite its being more of a hobby among work buddies, I was instantly hooked — on the office camaraderie, on the knowledge and skill needed to build a roster and set weekly lineups, on the Vegas-level thrill of having “action” on every game. I might even win a few bucks at the end of the season.
Eventually I got so deep into fantasy football that I quit my job, wrote a memoir and contributed weekly columns to fantasy sports sites. And I could, because through the 2000s fantasy sports went mainstream. In the ’90s, you were the office weirdo if you played fantasy sports; by the mid 2000s, you were an outcast if you didn’t. Still, I figured it would stay that way, more or less: a hobby.
That all changed in 2009, when a new company called FanDuel helped introduce the idea of daily fantasy sports. Unlike the season-long, small-stakes activity that came before it, daily fantasy sports compresses the excitement of season-long leagues — drafting and managing teams, having action on every game — into a single week or even a day, all over an Internet platform that allows for immense pools of players, and money. Suddenly, you could win as much as $2 million within hours, not 16 weeks..."
Leandro Castelao
Richard