Steve Fatula
TUG Member
As an aside, I wonder how Amazon views (perhaps values is a better word) each customer. I suspect Amazon has run the numbers to determine the average customer’s use of Amazon products and services. Another way Amazon has likely calculated this is to determine the cost of each customer per service offered.
For example, our family uses the streaming service, rarely (maybe 4 times per year) purchases something from Amazon that requires shipping, and uses the photo storage service a lot. There is no way our family comes close to using $119 of services from Amazon on an annual basis but yet we are stuck with the same price that a person who orders frequently from Amazon pays. Although I am sure Amazon would not lower its prices to offer such a thing, I wonder if it is possible Amazon will offer ala carte services (allowing customers to choose the parts of Amazon they want and not pay for the areas they would not use).
Yes, I agree that bundling is both good and bad. For those who only use one or two pieces, they may indeed pay more than it's worth. I always hated that with internet when I lived in town. I didn't want phone, TV, etc. For us, since we already get streaming with Prime, it made no sense to also buy Netflix. So, our view is Prime pays for the streaming, and everything else is "free". But obviously that is not true for many others. We watch a *lot* of video. Definitely cheap for us. And we like it better than Netflix which we used to have.