Alaska Airlines grounding fleet of Boeing 737 Max jets for inspection after emergency landing

[MULTIZ321]

Alaska Airlines grounding fleet of Boeing 737 Max jets fo inspection after emergency landing

Alaska Airlines grounding fleet of Boeing 737 Max jets for inspection after emergency landing

Alaska Airlines announced late Friday that it will ground all 65 of its Boeing 737 Max 9 aircraft after a plane experienced “explosive decompression” mid-flight. Photos and video shared by passenge…

thehill.com

Richard

 

[DeniseM]

Note to self: Do not book exit row.

 

[Luanne]

That would have been extremely scary.

 

[dsmrp]

I have a flight to Honolulu on Tuesday and listed aircraft is the Max 900. Originally our flight was on Monday , during CFP title game. We got an offer from Alaska a few days ago to change flights for a little money back. Since our local college team UW is playing in championship game, it was an easy decision.

Just hope Alaska doesn't cancel our Tuesday flight. Fortunately our schedule is flexible since we're retired and only visiting family. Have no hotel, timeshare or car rentals to adjust.

 

[dsmrp]

Now the FAA has ordered temp grounding of MAX 9's in the US, requiring inspections before they go back in service.

 

[bnoble]

Note to self: Do not book exit row.

Further note to self: keep the seat belt buckled while seated.

 

[Luanne]

Further note to self: keep the seat belt buckled while seated.

Like it's recommended to do.

 

[1Kflyerguy]

This is also impacted United. Our flight to Kona is delayed by over 5 hours today. Still hoping to get there today.

First trip with our 18 month grandson, he is not a fan of delays...

 

[easyrider]

Our friends fly out tomorrow. They were Alaska Air but now it's either Korean or Figi on a 737 Max 9. I wonder if their flight gets cancelled. We sat one row behind the exit row on an Alaskan flight to Hawaii last Saturday.

Bill

 

[claraj]

I read that it wasn't even an exit row!

 

[Superchief]

FAA grounds Boeing 737 Max 9s after Alaska Airlines jet loses window. Could it happen again?

An Alaska Airlines flight, a Boeing 737 MAX 9 aircraft, lost a window mid-flight. The airline and FAA grounded some jets. But could this happen again?

www.cincinnati.com

Fortunately, nobody was hurt. I wouldn't want to be a passenger in the row where the window/wall blew out.

 

[Ken555]

delete

 

[Ken555]

I read that it wasn't even an exit row!

It was an exit but Alaska doesn’t use it - I’m not sure why. So it looks like a permanent part but it is an exit row. I saw an image that showed the rear exit door from the outside, but it’s not available within. I’m sure someone else will chime in with a better explanation.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[claraj]

You are right. I read another article that it was "plugged" without a door (to make the plane lighter?). That does not sound very safe.

 

[buzglyd]

That can be an exit row based on plane configuration. It was not required in that configuration so they use a plug. Clearly it was installed improperly.

 

[T_R_Oglodyte]

It was an exit but Alaska doesn’t use it - I’m not sure why. So it looks like a permanent part but it is an exit row. I saw an image that showed the rear exit door from the outside, but it’s not available within. I’m sure someone else will chime in with a better explanation.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Per local news -

The blowout occurred where the is an opening in the fuselage for an added emergency exit. That additional emergency exit is required on MAX9s used by certain low-cost carriers, such as Ryan Air, that cram more seats onto the plane. With thad added number of passengers, an additional emergency exit is required. The problem doesn't exist on the MAX8s because that is a smaller plane that doesn't require an extra emergency exit even when crammed full by the Ryan airs of the airline industry. For carriers who don't configure the planes for that many passengers, that opening in the fuselage is plugged.

It's evident that the plug blew out. Presumably, the inspections established by Alaska Airlines in their initial grounding of planes, followed later by the general FAA grounding notice, is for inspection of the fasteners for that plug.

I expect that the fasteners will be a critical component of the NTSB investigation.

 

[T_R_Oglodyte]

The fuselage blowout on Alaska Airlines’ Boeing 737 MAX 9: What we know

The Boeing 737 MAX 9 has been grounded after an Alaska flight made an emergency landing in Portland, Friday. Here’s what we know about the incident.

www.seattletimes.com

 

[simpsontruckdriver]

Boeing wants a FEDERAL EXEMPTION so they don't have to follow safety guidelines for the Max 7. Yeah, pilots and the pilot's union are not happy, neither are safety groups!

TS

 

[MULTIZ321]

Air traffic control audio captures how pilot responded after losing section of plane
mid-flight

https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2024/01/06/alaska-airline-737-max-fuselage-plug-muntean-nr-vpx.cnn

Richard

 

[1Kflyerguy]

We jumped to standby on a different flight, and fortunately we all made it. Will be late when get to the resort, but hopefully that the last of the drama for us

 

[davidvel]

Boeing wants a FEDERAL EXEMPTION so they don't have to follow safety guidelines for the Max 7. Yeah, pilots and the pilot's union are not happy, neither are safety groups!

TS

That's a bit overbroad and highly misleading. More accurate is that they are seeking that the same engine system (completely unrelated to this incident) approved by the FAA and currently being used on on existing aircraft be grandfathered for the 737Max7 aircraft, despite updated guidelines that apply to newly designed/certified aircraft that would otherwise require a new certification.

It is a de-icing system that has already been approved for use by the FAA, not the entire Max 7 aircraft. The FAA has the authority to grant such an exemption, which it may or may not do, likely based in no way upon what pilot unions say.

 

[davidvel]

Some additional notes:

As stated above this is not considered an exit row, but could be configured to be an emergency exit. It was not on this plane, and from the inside it basically looks the same as other rows (on this aircraft it is row 26, but this may change based on the cabin seating configuration).

This plane has only been in service for about a month. The day before this flight, there was a maintenance report of pressure anomalies. It is unknown what action, inspection, or testing was done if any.

So far there is no word on the specific cause, and the "plug" has not been located. Discussion of bolts, attachment, etc are currently pure speculation.

It is unclear if such an incident has ever happened before, involving a similar plugged exit.

 

[easyrider]

It was just a couple of weeks ago that Boeing asked airlines to check a rudder bolt as the nuts were falling off.

Bill

Boeing asks airlines to inspect 737 Max jets for potential loose bolt

According to Boeing, there have been no in-flight incidents caused by this condition to date

calgaryherald.com

 

[davidvel]

It was just a couple of weeks ago that Boeing asked airlines to check a rudder bolt as the nuts were falling off.

Bill

Boeing asks airlines to inspect 737 Max jets for potential loose bolt

According to Boeing, there have been no in-flight incidents caused by this condition to date

calgaryherald.com

Not true. There was one bolt that was found with a missing nut found after routine inspection.

 

[easyrider]

Not true. There was one bolt that was found with a missing nut found after routine inspection.

What do you mean "not true" ? Every 737 Max underwent inspections for this which isn't the same thing as the regular routine maintenance performed on this aircraft.

Bill