- Joined
- Jun 7, 2005
- Messages
- 14,879
- Reaction score
- 5,992
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Resorts Owned
-
Westin Kierland
Sheraton Desert Oasis
And another Malaysia plane just experienced an emergency. Hmm.
Sent from my iPad
Sent from my iPad
Strange, when no one could connect with the plane, no military aircraft went out to find it? No one cared?But in those early hours of March 8, pilots flying nearby heard an unusual crescendo of chatter on the radio frequencies used by radar control in Vietnam and Malaysia. Air traffic personnel in both countries were trying and failing to reach the plane.
“Any stations in contact with Malaysian 370, please relay.”
Vietnamese and Malaysian controllers asked one aircraft after another to radio the jet. Pilots listened as one plane after another tried and heard only static..."
From what I've read, one of the reasons to get to a lower altitude is in the event of loss of pressurization, and is a safety action. I'm sure the pilots who are on tug can speak to this issue. Sorry if this has been covered already in the last few hundred posts...
I believe that shortly after the last communication, a severe mechanical event could have occurred that may have gone so far as to cripple flight instrumentation and the ability to communicate. In the dark of night, in the blind, with a malfunctioning plane. Do they continue on course or do they make a decision to immediately reverse course back toward land? They turn back, drop altitude in order topreserve fuel (and even tobreathe if cabin depressurization was involved),in hopes that they will eventually be able to regain communication and control of the plane nearer to land. They cannot drop too low so as not to smack dead into a mountain, but low enough that when they have control and reorientation by the light of day,they will be able to rapidly descend and land safely. But ultimately that failed as they never fully regained control of the plane or orientation toward a safe landing strip.
Yes, I just needed to edit out the altitude piece of it.
Strange, when no one could connect with the plane, no military aircraft went out to find it? No one cared?
I've seen it. I'm just assuming that if the Taliban had an airstrip and hangar that could accommodate a 777, wouldn't that mean they already have their own large plane? Definitely not a 777, but it seems that would have their own large plane already. Sorry, not buying into either one of these theories.
I believe that shortly after the last communication, a severe mechanical event could have occurred that may have gone so far as to cripple flight instrumentation and the ability to communicate. In the dark of night, in the blind, with a malfunctioning plane. Do they continue on course or do they make a decision to immediately reverse course back toward land? They turn back, drop altitude in order to preserve fuel (and even to breathe if cabin depressurization was involved), in hopes that they will eventually be able to regain communication and control of the plane nearer to land. They cannot drop too low so as not to smack dead into a mountain, but low enough that when they have control and reorientation by the light of day,they will be able to rapidly descend and land safely. But ultimately that failed as they never fully regained control of the plane or orientation toward a safe landing strip.
If I'm not mistaken, even the experts have already concluded days ago there wasn't an aircraft emergency.
Is your last name Goodfellow? That sounds fairly close to the original Goodfellow theory that began this whole thread.
Israel has said that they feel the lost 777 is viable and could be used against them.
You keep making the mistake of confusing what one private Israeli citizen, Isaac Yeffet, says as being what the nation of Isreal says! Let's be truthful, the state of Israel has said no such thing!
I do suppose, though, you could get a reporting job at any of the major news outlets because they've all seemed to have gone to the same school of journalism as you have.
TODAY SHOW is now saying they now believe the airliner went down 460 miles off of the Australian coast in the Indian ocean
You do realize that Issaac Yeffet is a retired Israeli agent and a former head of security for Israeli Airlines ? Currently he is working as an airline security consultant in the USA. So yes, I would entertain what this guy thinks could have happened as true before what the country of Malaysia thinks.
At this point, anyone would be crazy not to believe it's in the Indian ocean. That's where they are seeing the floating debris and that's where they are frantically searching.
If anyone believes otherwise at this point, please step forward.
Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 went down over the southern Indian Ocean, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak said Monday, citing a new analysis of satellite data by a British satellite company and accident investigators, and apparently ending hopes that anyone survived.
Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 went down over the southern Indian Ocean, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak said Monday, citing a new analysis of satellite data by a British satellite company and accident investigators, and apparently ending hopes that anyone survived.
A relative of a missing passenger briefed by the airline in Beijing said, "They have told us all lives are lost."
The Prime Minister based his announcement on what he described as unprecedented analysis of satellite data sent by the plane by British satellite provider Inmarsat and the British Air Accidents Investigation Branch. He didn't describe the nature of the analysis.
But he said it made it clear that the plane's last position was in the middle of the remote southern Indian Ocean, "far from any possible landing sites."
Do you realize that he is a private Isreali citizen and does not speak for the State of Isreal?
Again, saying "Isreal" states this based on this one private citizens opinion is like saying the United States of America says TWA 800 was shot down by a wayward Navy missle because that's what Pierre Salinger stated and believed.
...Not really confirmed as flight 370 yet a wreck has been found.
http://breakingthenews.weebly.com/1...-in-the-southern-indian-ocean-yahoo-news.html
Bill
Hi Phydeaux,
...
Malaysia Airlines Fight 370: Runways in Range - from wnyc.org
Gan Airport (Maldives) is in that grouping. Wonder if authorities seriously checked out the sighting of the low flying aircraft. The military base at Diego Garcia is only about 580 miles from the Maldives - we certainly could quickly have some assets there to conduct a search.
Richard
Where in that story does it say a wreck has been found?
No wreckage has yet to be recovered.