bogey21
TUG Member
If I were an owner here I would be pushing to delay a resolution of this. My guess is that as the deadline 2020 approaches other alternatives will be put forward from which to choose.
George
George
If I were an owner here I would be pushing to delay a resolution of this. My guess is that as the deadline 2020 approaches other alternatives will be put forward from which to choose.
George
Just about every deeded timeshare resort has an expiration of the timeshare plan. Time frames vary, and rules vary by State. But the expiration exists because of the Rule Against Perpetuities.
Simplistically put, "perpetuity" as in "never ending" does not exist. It must be defined.
An interesting example is Marriott Desert Springs Villas II.
Rather than a fixed time frame, the governing documents define "perpetuity" as the death of the last living direct descendent of either George H. W. Bush, or, Bill Clinton (the then former and current Presidents). No joke.
So, the timeshare documents must be re-established (or entirely re-written). If they are not then each deed holder owns an undivided fractional interest in a specific condo. No master association, or anything for that matter, unless a majority of individual owners agree.
Can you imagine? It can turn into quite a mess.
No red, white, and blue weeks. Just a 52nd interest, where a Blue Season owner has exactly the same ownership interest as a Red owner, and all must agree on a equitable disposition.
Vistana Courts is being proactive about this. They better be. They have to get a majority in line. Not a majority of those who vote, but a majority of all owners. An owner who does not vote, is a vote against.
I would not be surprised if some owners get the idea that their condo should be sold. Or, or, ...
This will be interesting.
Ride - Just for fun, because it's not going to happen - but if they don't get the votes they need, and all contracts end in 2020 - who will: check you in, take out the trash, mow the lawn, wash the sheets, and throw out the riff raff?
How will you get all the owners together to figure out how to run the place?
Yes, you will still have a piece of paper with your name on it, but who is going to manage and maintain the resort?
Selling isn't that easy, you have to be able to provide clear title to the buyer. When the TS plan collapses, we would at best have to get enough owners together for each unit to force the others to allow a sale through the courts. At worst, they would require all 52 owners to agree to sell. That would have to be done for every condo unit in the development. Once clear title to the entire development could be determined, then perhaps a buyer could be found. By the time that all happens my great grandchildren will have spent their entire inheritance trying to get the $1000 that great granddad's timeshare might possibly have been worth out of legal limbo. It's an impossible proposition!
Considering how long these things can drag out, I'm not sure that 8 years is enough time to get it done. I do hope that enough owners respond this time around for quorum, or we are going to be paying to keep asking the same question over and over until 2020.
Exciting News from Your Courts Association Board of Directors!
Great News Fellow Courts Owner!
We are delighted to inform you that the amendment that ensures the continuation of the Courts’ timeshare plan was overwhelmingly approved by a vote of the membership conducted at the special membership meeting held yesterday, October 8th.
Ownership and use of your specific “week” and in your specific “unit” remains unchanged. You may continue to exchange your week through various exchange service providers. Additionally, SVN Members continue to have internal exchange rights.
More importantly, you and your family may continue to enjoy memorable vacations for many years to come!
Thank you for your participation and support in achieving this important milestone.
Sincerely,
Board of Directors
Vistana Condominium Association, Inc.
It will head up Starwood's timeshare business upon the closing of the transaction and will continue to work for the beautiful Paradise Island in the Bahamas as part of a proposed one. [spam link deleted]
it is though, right?
I'm no lawyer, but the case goods, their replacement and maintenance have been paid by the owners via maintenance fees and special assessments, so I would guess they would have to remain with the condos.
maybe stupid question but any affect this has on SVV?