Ok, I'll be polite and ask you to explain yourself. Why did you reply to aden's comments that were for owner1...as if you were owner1? You even claimed that "And I'm not in anyone's pocket...".
There's really only one explanation, that you're posting with multiple aliases, slipped up and got caught but I'll await your explanation. Assuming there is no explanation, I'm glad there isn't another flame war on here over this, it's implications are pretty obvious.
Yikes! A little paranoia happening here!
I can assure you, I have no idea who owner1 is and I really don't care who owner1 is. When I comment here, I try to be as unbiased as possible. There are a lot of things said in this string of comments and many are misleading from both sides.
First of all, aden2's comments are, in my opinion, misleading. When I looked at Travelocity, Interval (Getaways and Exchanges) and then Trip Adviser, aden2 is correct in that Sunchaser is listed. But despite trying all of the weeks and several 2 or 3 day periods, there is no availability which tells me they are busy. Maybe I missed some dates but overall there is no availability over the summer months. Can't speak to the pricing as I could not find any prices as no units were available. And even if they are cheaper than what owners are paying, better some revenue than none. That is how corporations think. Secondly, despite there being no availability, if you read the comments people are leaving, they are generally favourable. So, that being said, maybe the resort is not 100% but overall it sounds like most people that commented were positive.
Finally, my comment about not being in anyone's back pocket - that was in reference to aden2's comment to owner1. Throughout this string of comments, there are many accusations about individuals in regards to being execs (or being in their "back pocket") at Northwynd, etc. Most of these accusations are made whenever a comment does not go with the flow of those that are involved with the litigation. Therefore my statement that I am not in anyone's back pocket.
So there is your explanation. Like it or not, it is what it is. I think if you look at my history of comments in this matter, you will see I'm not a staunch Northwynd supporter nor am I a member of the litigation group. I have paid the reno fee as well as my mtce fees. Not 100% willingly but I was not prepared to take the risk of litigation.
Do I agree with the direction Northwynd has gone? No.
Am I sorry I never got involved with the litigation? No.
Am I nervous about what the future will bring for our resort. Definitely yes. But that does not automatically make me want to join the legal action. I have seen far too many court decisions made that do not seem to make sense but that is our legal system. On average, lawyers only win 50% of their cases. There is always a winner and a loser. In my eyes, the risk of losing and having to pay the fees plus interest plus legal costs is too great. That is not something I am prepared to gamble with. Very easy to say even if the case is lost, I am not paying Northwynd a dime but we are not talking about $10.00 or $20.00. We are talking about thousands, if not 10's of thousands and Northwynd is not about to write that off. They want their pound of flesh.
Anyway, I have gone on far too long and gotten off topic, but at least I got that all off my chest!
Long answer to your short question - I am ERW and only ERW. And I imagine owner1 is laughing his/her head off.