truthr
There is nothing to be afraid of. What you need to understand is that there is a big difference between civil and criminal law and the litigation processes involved. We haven't been successful just yet in having a formal RCMP investigation on the basis of complaints of criminal wrongdoing (i.e. fraud), largely because of the costs that would be involved that would necessitate the use of forensic auditors/accountants (their time to unravel the mess).
M. Geldhert proceeded with the appeal, and likely now with a statement of claim for damages and compensation. These are civil proceedings. If there was a criminal conviction against certain individuals associated with Northwynd/mont then all these civil proceedings would become secondary, and much unnecessary.
What I have said is that regardless of the outcome of any civil lawsuit it would be a miscarriage of justice to let these thieves walk away and be better off for it all; because suing Northwynd/mont for what is left of the Fairmont properties isn't going to make a dent in the bank accounts of these criminals, you can't get at them personally as only the business assets are liable. This is why bankruptcy fraud exists, and why I know it has occurred with Fairmont/Northwynd, and is almost a certainty to occur once the trust is dissolved.
I deal with the assessment of criminals and the courts they are tried in, that is my job. I have seen this before in various shapes and forms. That is why I don't take too kindly to white collar psychopaths walking away with a fortune after putting the screws to innocent people. I have very little at stake here financially, I cut these guys off in 2011 and never had much to begin with; it is the principle that is most important here.
There is nothing to be afraid of. What you need to understand is that there is a big difference between civil and criminal law and the litigation processes involved. We haven't been successful just yet in having a formal RCMP investigation on the basis of complaints of criminal wrongdoing (i.e. fraud), largely because of the costs that would be involved that would necessitate the use of forensic auditors/accountants (their time to unravel the mess).
M. Geldhert proceeded with the appeal, and likely now with a statement of claim for damages and compensation. These are civil proceedings. If there was a criminal conviction against certain individuals associated with Northwynd/mont then all these civil proceedings would become secondary, and much unnecessary.
What I have said is that regardless of the outcome of any civil lawsuit it would be a miscarriage of justice to let these thieves walk away and be better off for it all; because suing Northwynd/mont for what is left of the Fairmont properties isn't going to make a dent in the bank accounts of these criminals, you can't get at them personally as only the business assets are liable. This is why bankruptcy fraud exists, and why I know it has occurred with Fairmont/Northwynd, and is almost a certainty to occur once the trust is dissolved.
I deal with the assessment of criminals and the courts they are tried in, that is my job. I have seen this before in various shapes and forms. That is why I don't take too kindly to white collar psychopaths walking away with a fortune after putting the screws to innocent people. I have very little at stake here financially, I cut these guys off in 2011 and never had much to begin with; it is the principle that is most important here.