Yes, judges can be unpredictable and you never know what other factors or politics will influence their decisions. But based on the merits of our case, I am optimistic of a favourable ruling, although I expect the final ruling will not come at the next hearing which is scheduled for July 12.
We always knew Mr. Wankel would try to pull the numbers game, as flawed as that approach might be, in order to influence the judge for a favourable ruling. But lets keep in mind the judicial system is not based on democracy, it is based on the rule of law. Therefore it doesn't matter how many of the majority remain silent, it will be contract law, precedents, and the strength of our argument that will determine the outcome. There is certainly no doubt the Companies are guilty of a number of breeches of contract and misrepresentations.
As an example of how extraneous are the relative numbers, take a real life example that occurred some time ago. I forget the exact numbers so I'll paraphrase to make the point. Some of the chartered banks were found guilty of calculating compound interest incorrectly. Out of, lets say 100,000 customers, say 99,995 were oblivious and just paid what they were billed. The other five recognized the error and took the banks to court and won. The fact that 99,995 said nothing was not proof of approval for bank policy. Ultimately it is truth and the rule of law that wins the day.
Incidentally, Mr. Wankel has filed a second affidavit with the court and the lawyers for our side have the opportunity on July 5th to depose him (interview and question him). The lawyers should have a fun day!
Let's make sure we hang in together. If you haven't signed up with one of the lawyers or groups, I understand it's still not too late. Complete a Form 67 and an affidavit and get it into the court. Together we can defeat this injustice for a quite small cost per individual.
We always knew Mr. Wankel would try to pull the numbers game, as flawed as that approach might be, in order to influence the judge for a favourable ruling. But lets keep in mind the judicial system is not based on democracy, it is based on the rule of law. Therefore it doesn't matter how many of the majority remain silent, it will be contract law, precedents, and the strength of our argument that will determine the outcome. There is certainly no doubt the Companies are guilty of a number of breeches of contract and misrepresentations.
As an example of how extraneous are the relative numbers, take a real life example that occurred some time ago. I forget the exact numbers so I'll paraphrase to make the point. Some of the chartered banks were found guilty of calculating compound interest incorrectly. Out of, lets say 100,000 customers, say 99,995 were oblivious and just paid what they were billed. The other five recognized the error and took the banks to court and won. The fact that 99,995 said nothing was not proof of approval for bank policy. Ultimately it is truth and the rule of law that wins the day.
Incidentally, Mr. Wankel has filed a second affidavit with the court and the lawyers for our side have the opportunity on July 5th to depose him (interview and question him). The lawyers should have a fun day!
Let's make sure we hang in together. If you haven't signed up with one of the lawyers or groups, I understand it's still not too late. Complete a Form 67 and an affidavit and get it into the court. Together we can defeat this injustice for a quite small cost per individual.