Sandcastle Owner going to court
Four years later and the struggle continues. The Brennan family (deeded owner) has a court date.
Brennan vs. Hagberg. August 9, 2012 at the Orleans District Court, 237 Rock Harbor Road, Orleans, Massachusetts.
Tom Mitchell, another deeded Sandcastle owner will be at the resort that week and will be attending. He has asked that I post this and if there is anyone who will be at the resort or in the area that week and would like to attend the court hearing to contact him and he will be glad to provide transportation.
Tom Mitchell ... Week 31, Unit 220. You can reach him via email:
tominspfld@gmail.com or cell phone: 860-989-5685
Mr. Brennan's description of the case:
Summarization of Case: developer doesn't pay its share and this inflates your cost, Sandcastle Resort is a sole propreitorship of Hagberg that doesn't follow the common area percentage and commingles trust funds... and defalcations (who pays the developer share? property taxes?)
fraud (billings and financial summaries and letter responses to questions), constructive fraud (Festiva), conspiracy to commit larceny (repeated overbilling, ignoring off season week half share, special assessment illegal and unlawful) mail fraud (Festiva, annual assessments not according to common area percentage, 1 response letters says Intercity pays same as every owner (lies) - all enabled by the trickery of it being an investment contract with an approval process of sending a bill and receiving a check (the approval))
Extortion: as a "holder" of information, that makes the collector of the money an official agent, so demanding more money and getting it as the owner fears personal damage to their credit rating is extortion by Mass. law definition - if Sandcastle Resort is not delegated this authority, then they cannot collect the taxes, can they? I am sure this topic will be seriously argued, but if they win that idea they are not delegated agents of the trusts' trustees, then surely its a sole propreitorship based on the business name certificate filing, therefore the one who must pay will be Hagberg PERSONALLY, which was the point...
Aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty: this and Chapter 230 section 5 enables a beneficiary to sue any and all third parties who are screwing the trusts...
All I have to prove is that they knew it. It's hard to pretend Hagberg didn't know when he is trustee, developer, managing entity, and Sandcastle Resort (still not sure what the demarcations of when each position starts and stops and what each one actually does -since Hagberg claims all the contracts are private)