• Welcome to the FREE TUGBBS forums! The absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 32 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 32 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 32nd anniversary: Happy 32nd Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    All subscribers auto-entered to win all free TUG membership giveaways!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

[2008] Festiva is now managing my resort, how bad is it going to get?

Festiva/Atrium Litigation information

I've been asked to post the Atrium leaseholders side of the Atrium/Festiva contract dispute. I have attached a letter we send to Atrium owners, it trys to explain fully what has transpired over the past 2 years. At this time we have filed our response in the Sint Maarten courts to the Festiva suit against 3 owners to change the conditions of our lease/contract. We have at this time 450 owners in our litigation group, this group at this time has 3 injunction petitions before the Sint Maarten court as there are no provisions in Sint Maarten for a class action suit. The first two injunction petitions were settled in 2007 by agreements with Atrium to honor our existing contracts, Festiva has violated thse agreements two times and we have brought these injunctions back before the court. The third injunction petition includes the new owners that have joined the proceedings. All three injunctions are before the court. At this time the court is in recess for the month of July.

Any Atrium owner interested in joining the litigation please contact me. Rowiep@aol.com Rowie Percoco




Dear Fellow Atrium Leaseholder,

This letter is to try and inform you of a new organization that 370 current Atrium leaseholders have formed to protect your current Atrium lease against changes proposed by the new owners of the Atrium Resorts NV, Festiva Resorts. This new organization is called The Atrium Resort Lessees of Sint Maarten a Non Profit Foundation, its objective is: “The objective of the Foundation is to promote, preserve and defend the terms and conditions of the leaseholder’s contract with the Atrium Resort NV; to organize current and future leaseholders agreeing to maintain the current leaseholder agreement.”

We invite you to join this organization, as an Atrium Leaseholder you have a vested interest in maintaining your lease as written and sold to you by the Atrium Resorts NV.

If you are not familiar with the current situation regarding the dispute concerning our lease this letter will try to bring you up to date so that you may make an educated decision about defending your current lease terms and conditions. We will give a brief history, what we are defending, what our motives are and what we expect for the future.

History:
As you know Festiva Resorts purchased the Atrium Resort NV in October 2005. With this purchase they assumed all lease contracts, the remaining unsold inventory and the physical building and contents. They also assumed all management responsibilities and liabilities.
In October of 2006 they informed all the leaseholders of the implementation of a Special Assessment of two times the maintenance fee and 10% increase in the maintenance fees. This increase in the maintenance fees and special assessment were in violation of the terms and conditions of the leaseholder agreement.
In November 2006 a group of lessees retained an attorney in Sint Maarten to dispute the violations of the lease agreements. From that point over 370 leaseholders have joined the litigation. We have two agreements with Atrium Resorts NV/Festiva Resorts pertaining to Atrium Resorts NV honoring the existing lease agreements.
In April of 2007 Festiva/Atrium billed all Atrium leaseholders a reduced special assessment. In this letter by Festiva/Atrium, statements were made that a plan was made between and by an appointed advisory board of four leaseholders and Festiva management and a reduced assessment plus the 10% increase in maintenance fees would be implemented for 2007. This letter also stated future assessments would be needed and Festiva made a mistake by trying to bill the assessment all at one time
In December 2007 Atrium Resorts NV filed suit in Sint Maarten court against a represented group of 3 Atrium leaseholders a suit to change the terms of the current lease. In this suit Festiva/Atrium is asking the court to abolish all reference to the increase in maintenance fees control by the use of the CPI of the NA as agreed to by the parties in the lease agreement, Article 9. Festiva/Atrium claims this clause is unacceptable and asks the court to set aside this clause and permit Festiva/Atrium to “always annually raise the maintenance fee contribution in the future subject to real figures and that the presented increase in fees be checked firstly by an independent accountant”. They also have requested the court to require the “summoned party” to pay the 10% increase in maintenance fees and special assessment of two (2) times the annual maintenance fee.
Festiva/Atrium wishes to be released from the restrictions in Article 9, Limitation of increases in maintenance fees to the CPI of the NA, and they want the court to strike this Article from the existing contract.


Our Motives:
The motive first and foremost is to protect the contract. As in many cases we purchased our unit with a 99 year lease. In our minds the contract was written to preserve our vacation in a stable, safe and secure manner. It is a contract that protects both the owner of Atrium NV and the leassee’s. It was presented as one of the best on the island. After the preservation of our lease/contract we can then move on as a group and discuss what is in the best interest of the Atrium Resort. In 2000 Atrium NV, owned by Simon Mcauley, hired Festiva Resorts to sell and market the same contracts that Festiva Resorts is now trying to change through the Sint Maarten court. Many of you purchased your units under the ownership of Simon Mcauley and sales of Festiva Resorts.

Expectations:
We expect Festiva Resorts/Atrium NV to honor the contract’s they assumed and sold when they purchased the business. We expect Atrium NV to adhere to said lease/contract and maintain the Atrium resort in the manner stated in the lease/contract. Under the terms and conditions of the lease maintenance fee increases are limited to the annual increase in the CPI of the Netherlands Antilles. We expect to utilize the remaining years left on our lease/contracts as specified under the terms and conditions of said contract.

What does this mean to you, an Atrium Leaseholder:
If the court finds in favor of Festiva/Atrium your contract and all Atrium leaseholder contracts will be subject to this ruling. Festiva/Atrium at its whim may and will raise your maintenance fee each and every year subject to a budget with the only control on spending “firstly checked by an independent accountant”. You will be subject to any and all expenses of operations at the Atrium in the past and in the future. You will also be subject to any and all Special Assessments requested by Festiva/Atrium and subject to legal interest until said Assessments are paid in full. You will be subject to any and all changes as promulgated by Festiva resorts.
As members of the Foundation we can as one entity defend the terms and conditions of the existing lease/contract. The Foundation will provide the members legal representation and advise and assist the members. Your and our goal will be to defend the terms and conditions of the lease and maintain the Atrium in the condition as prescribed in said lease/contract.
The Foundation is registered with the Government of Sint Maarten and the constitution is available for you to review.

Why should you join the litigation group?
You have, as we all have, about 80 years remaining on your existing lease. If the current owners of the Atrium Resort NV continue to raise maintenance fees and charge special assessments at will, your lease will be worthless in a very short period of time and the expense of owning your lease will be prohibitive. The previous owner of the Atrium maintained the resort with the funds covered under the current contract. Every leaseholder desires the Atrium Resort to be maintained as per the agreement in place. We all realize conditions change and additional funds may be needed for specific purposes. What cannot change are the terms and conditions of the lease as endorsed by the parties. The lease must be upheld in court as it was endorsed. Festiva bought the Atrium Resort NV after five years of being the selling agent of this same contract to many of you. Under it’s ”due Diligence” Festiva Resorts must have discounted the purchase of the resort due to the “deficit” listed in the 1997-2005 financial reports. The leaseholder cannot be responsible for bad business decisions and Festiva Resorts must abide by the lease as it accepted all terms and conditions upon acquiring said leases.
All we need for you to join the Foundation is an email request that you want to join the Foundation and support the litigation to preserve your Atrium lease. Please include your name, address, phone, unit number and week in your email. You can also write to me with the same request but we prefer to use email as it is cost effective and easier to keep record as we have to forward everything to the attorney in Sint Maarten.
My email is rowiep@aol.com. Please email me if you require additional information or a copy of either the Festiva suit or the Foundation constitution. Our mailing address is: Rowie Percoco, Atrium Fund, 7138 Westmoreland Dr. Sarasota, FL 34243 Phone 941-360-3336 We also have information on our website: www.atriumowners.com
This is a very important decision to make. A large group of leaseholders have already decided to maintain the terms and conditions of their lease. Many of you did not know of the litigation efforts or heard stories about the litigation that are certainly out of context. It has been very difficult to contact the leaseholders as Festiva has refused to provide any lists of owners to anyone. Please contact me if you care about maintaining your lease/contract so that we may continue to enjoy our vacation experience at the Atrium Resort as sold to us by the Atrium Resort.

Sincerely,

Rowie Percoco, Lead Litigant
 
Yes, that is a press release from 2005. The initial lawsuit filed was withdrawn after being on hold for 3 years because it was filed prematurely by the MOAG (that being the standard procedure that was not followed by the MOAG). However; Festiva signed the Voluntary Agreement, and those 60 or so owners involved are getting their money.

I'm not sure why those who are not even involved in this particular situation and are not owners at this resort are so concerned about Festiva paying restitution to owners...
It sounds like you are putting more spin on the settlement. You make it sound like the MO AG dismissed the lawsuit shortly after it was filed in 2005. The more likely scenario is that as part of the settlement the MO AG dismissed the State's case against Festiva? I am sure that the MO AG had probable cause to believe that there was a violation of Missouri consumer laws at the time the lawsuit was filed. I suspect that after trying to dismiss and delay the lawsuit by filing motions, etc., when faced with evidence of violations of law, Festiva agreed to the settlement. You can call it voluntary if you like, but I bet the MO AG would have taken the case to trial if the "voluntary" settlement had not been reached.

As to why non-owners of the Branson resort would be interested in the settlement, it is an indication of how Festiva conducts business.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for coming here rowboat. It is always better to hear the facts from actual owners involved in litigation rather than heresay. There are some Atrium members here, but most I think are former peppertree owners. I hope you will get some more members for your litigation. If you go to the home page and scroll down to the caribbean region forum you can start a new thread which should reach more Atrium owners. Posting here can also get your message out.

We are concerned that what is happening at your resort will happen to our resorts. Several here have heard festiva or their mgt group make statements at annual meetings like, " we need to ugrade your resort to return it to Gold Crown Status", "this resort has been losing money for years so we must increase MF's", "there is not enough money in reserves so we must assess (or increase MF's"). It seems like they are preparing owners (and members) for upcoming bad news by building their case for assessments and increased MFs. I believe that the same statements and tactics were used at your resort and the Church Street Inn in Charleston SC. I have read posts by owners at the church street inn that said that the resort was in good shape financially and physically when Festiva took over. One owner said that their MF's almost doubled in 2 years after Festiva took over (I am not sure of exact figures). They said that they had trouble obtaining good financial records or annual statements.

Rowboat, if you have a chance I was wondering if you could enlighten us on what condition the Atrium was actually in physically and financially when Festiva took over. The Festiva company line is that the resort was a wreck and needed everything renovated and the finances were in shambles. Was that true, partially true, or totally false? Since taking over has festiva been forthcoming with financial statements and expenditures, or have they just done what they want without verification or justification of costs to the owners. Do you feel like the resort was managed well before festiva and do you feel that any MF increases or assessments were needed? I appreciate any reponses you can give us from the side of an owner at the Atrium.

Thanks,

Tom
 
just an FYI...i have zero desire for this to become a legal battleground between festiva and current individuals involved in legal proceedings against festiva.

while I agree the door was opened to begin with in the discussion...i am sure the individual posting here for festiva is not a lawyer and given where this thread has turned...would not suprise me in the least if no more responses on said topic were given.
 
I emailed Rowboat and invited him here. Festiva rep kept saying that there was so much misinformation on the Atrium, so I e-mailed one of the owners who started the litigation and invited him to post his view from the owners side.

Festiva has someone posting their side, so why not invite owners at other Festiva resorts to join in to discuss and dispel myths or "misinformation"? I am sure that the Festiva Rep is not a lawyer either, but she seems to have no problem discussing the legal cases Festiva is or was involved in (i.e. Missouri, Atrium). I don't doubt that Festiva's legal dept reads and approves the posts that Festiva Rep posts here, but she is probably not an attorney herself.

I would not be surprised if rowboat does not post here again since he in in litigation, but I hope he will return and discuss in more detail what has happened and what is currently happening at his resort since Festiva took over.

Rowboat, thanks again for coming.

Tom
 
Last edited:
It was not my intention to prevent anyone from posting their opinion and or coming here to express it nor will i prevent anyone from doing so...instead merely to prevent TUG from turning into legal battleground for this particular issue.
 
Festiva Rep:
Tamarack is a fixed week resort.

Thanks for all your inputs

Sorry Jercal, more specifically I meant that prior to the acquisition last year, none of our resorts were fixed week.
 
It was not my intention to prevent anyone from posting their opinion and or coming here to express it nor will i prevent anyone from doing so...instead merely to prevent TUG from turning into legal battleground for this particular issue.

Actually, anything that has been posted here is most likely discoverable should there be any litigation.
 
Last edited:
just an FYI...i have zero desire for this to become a legal battleground between festiva and current individuals involved in legal proceedings against festiva.

while I agree the door was opened to begin with in the discussion...i am sure the individual posting here for festiva is not a lawyer and given where this thread has turned...would not suprise me in the least if no more responses on said topic were given.
She is probably not a legal person. Most likely, she is a public relations person. However, if she is not a legal person, she shouldn't be representing that she knows what happened in the course of the legal proceedings between the State of Missouri and Festiva. I can't speak to the Atrium owners lawsuit.
 
double edged sword there no?

if there was no reply to the original question some would want him/her lynched for ignoring the question =)
 
Brv 2

No I am not a legal person; however, all of the information that I've posted about the 'legal stuff' has come directly from our General Counsel, who I meet with on a regular basis.

Now, back to answering some of Tombo's questions about BRV 2... Phase 2 of Blue Ridge Village was in fact never sold out or even close to it. Way before Festiva ever came into the picture, the Peppertree/Equivest Vacation Club owned most of the unit intervals there.

Currently, the Festiva Adventure Club owns 2,560 unit intervals there, and the Equivest Club (which Festiva owns) owns 305. There are 3,876 total unit intervals in Phase 2, so Festiva's Clubs own 74% of phase 2.

Of the number that is currently owned by the Festiva Adventure Club (FAC), some were previously owned by the Equivest Club (EVC) and were moved as people have upgraded from EVC to FAC; Some were unsold Peppertree Resort Villas developer inventory that we purchased and moved to the FAC; and a few are from BRV 2 weeks owners who upgraded to the FAC.

I hope this clarifies some of your questions about the distribution of the intervals there.
 
Thank you for your support. I haven't taken the time to get back on the board because we were out of town. Other than the Festiva ploy to "trick" owners of weeks to trade to points I have not had any problems with Festiva. Unfortunately there has been quite a nasty litigation going on between Festiva and Summerwinds. That was a bit of a concern to me.
 
Thank you for your support. I haven't taken the time to get back on the board because we were out of town. Other than the Festiva ploy to "trick" owners of weeks to trade to points I have not had any problems with Festiva. Unfortunately there has been quite a nasty litigation going on between Festiva and Summerwinds. That was a bit of a concern to me.

OOPPPS....Not "litigation"....dispute....sorry...
 
Need some help with Peppertree Vacation Club in Asheville. Looking at possibly buying resale....
1.) Is Peppertree Asheville now part of Festiva? or are they on their own? I see conflicting info on-line.
2.) The unit is Equivest points - are those still valid? If not, is the unit only good for the deeded week or is it not good for anything? I am confused!
3.)Also - if Equivest is still alive - does anyone have a points chart? The points are 1500 and they state that number of points will be a 2bdrm - however, they have changed the posting since it initially showed up, so I want to be sure.
4.) There are lots of negative posts/threads regarding Festiva, Equivest resorts and the take over. Has anything changed or improved recently?

I will do my due dilligence and call the resort too - but wanted to get input from all the experienced Tugger's too! TIA!
Julie
 
Need some help with Peppertree Vacation Club in Asheville. Looking at possibly buying resale....

1.) Is Peppertree Asheville now part of Festiva? or are they on their own? I see conflicting info on-line.
Asheville does not appear to be part of the network anymore. I was told that the units were sold for a term of years and that the terms have expired. In addition, there were never many intervals in the EVTC.

2.) The unit is Equivest points - are those still valid? If not, is the unit only good for the deeded week or is it not good for anything? I am confused!
The points are still valid, but EVTC is a dying program, and Festiva is trying to get EVTC owners to pay over $3,000 to convert to Festiva's Adventure Club.

3.) Also - if Equivest is still alive - does anyone have a points chart? The points are 1500 and they state that number of points will be a 2bdrm - however, they have changed the posting since it initially showed up, so I want to be sure.
Yes, I have a points chart. 1,500 points is a small number of points. It would get you a two bedroom exchange with II during the Flexchange period. Most 2BR Club reservations during high season cost 2,800 - 3,300 EVTC points.

4.) There are lots of negative posts/threads regarding Festiva, Equivest resorts and the take over. Has anything changed or improved recently?
I have seen no improvement. You may want to join the Equivest - Peppertree Yahoo Group - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Equivest-PeppertreeOwners/
 
Hi Dawn;

The ability to trade internally is limited to points members only; therefore, fixed week owners do not have the ability to do this type of trade.

However, If you would like to stay at a Festiva property, as a member you are entitled to a discounted nightly rate of up to 50% off the current rack rate. These are NOT marketing/sales tours, you can book these by calling the resort(s) directly. The phone numbers can be found on our website.

We have been owners at the Cabins At Green Mt. for 3 years. We have never traded our unit. We were thinking of trading our unit internally this next year, as our Festiva Purchase Proposal states that we are "Festiva Resorts VIP Charter Members", and that one of our benefits is Prefferred Exchanges to all Festiva Resorts. As you stated above to Dawn, that there are no internal exchanges to owners, unless you have the points system. We are not interested in the points system, but we would like the Company to keep the promises that we have in writing. How can Festiva take back the promises that it gave the customers who bought Cabins from them 3 yrs. ago?

I would also like to thank Festivarep for answering our questions.

I would also like to say that The Cabins At Green Mountain in Branson are very nice cabins, and I am happy to be an owner there. I just would like to be given what I was promised in the beginning.
 
... How can Festiva take back the promises that it gave the customers who bought Cabins from them 3 yrs. ago? ...
I just would like to be given what I was promised in the beginning.

How? Because they can.
As a business professor once explained in a contracts class: No one has to honor a contract. People breach contracts all the time. For anyone contemplating breaking a contract, the bottom line is -- What will the other party do about it? Will they go thru the trouble to sue you, will they picket your office, or will they send someone to break your legs?"
 
Last edited:
It's also quite possible that, somewhere in that contract, it states that such things are subject to change without notice. Meaning---you don't have a promise of anything at all.

I don't know what Festiva's contracts look like, but Wyndham's does this for e.g. the VIP program. In reality, nothing at all is promised.
 
So it seems, that my only choice of trading for a week somewhere else, would be thru II. I dropped them a year ago, when I was told by a person that I talked with at Festiva, that I could trade internally. Guess I will renew my membership with II, because I am not trading to the point system. This may be something that the AG needs to look into. I would not have known anything about this, had it not been for the Tugg forum. Thanks for the information.
 
Sad truth isn't it...



How? Because they can.
As a business professor once explained in a contracts class: No one has to honor a contract. People breach contracts all the time. For anyone contemplating breaking a contract, the bottom line is -- What will the other party do about it? Will they go thru the trouble to sue you, will they picket your office, or will they send someone to break your legs?"
 
RE: Festiva Internal Trading

davidpatb:

As a Cabins at Green Mountain owner, you are not a fixed week owner, the week you own is a floating week. Festiva Resorts floating week owners do have the ability to trade with other Festiva Resorts. I'm sorry if my post to the Blue Ridge Village fixed week owner caused any confusion.

For more information on internal trading, please contact the Owner Services department at 866-933-7848.
 
Question for Festiva Rep

How would all this controversy affect me if I were to exchange inorder to spend a week at the Atrium? Is the Atrium in good shape or not? Apparently many people love that resort. Is it in the process of being destroyed?
 
Last edited:
We own at the Atrium and were just there in May. It's in great shape-we had a terrific time and it will be there whenever you go!
 
Top