• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 31st anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

[ MERGED ] Michigan family jailed in Mexico over timeshare dispute

If I was them, I'd never go near Mexico again, AND I'd tell everyone else not to either! I'd also wonder now that I'm in the US if any NDA is worth the paper it's printed on - again, it sure seems like signed under duress by American standards. I do wonder if Palace is trying to bring a civil action in Mexico or the US? I would bet in Mexico would just be a waste of their time TBH.

Also, very strangely, I saw people say Palace and the couple both paid ~$58k to a charity to end the case... if so - WTH?
 
Just got back from Palace Resorts yesterday. There was really no discussion on property or around the pool about any of this. People there were pleased with their holiday and were certainly enjoying their time! The band you wear, explains the level you came in on. No matter what the color of the band, ALL spoke highly of their stay!!! Just like any timeshare property here in the states, some are better than others.....Palace is right up there at the BEST! We are members....do not take advantage/exploit our benefits. Some folks want "something for nothing and tricks for free"......but first make sure what country you are in and what laws will apply to you. Obviously homework does help!
 
TUGBrian said:
and just when you thought that story had run its course....

now the couple is suing the resort!

nypost.com

Exclusive | Michigan couple held in Mexican prison for a month over timeshare dispute claims resort ‘weaponized’ criminal justice system

Paul and Christy Akeo claim Palace Resorts LLC brought bogus criminal charges to retaliate against them.
nypost.com nypost.com
Click to expand...

This really goes to show a problem with the Mexican justice system. The Akeos should have never been placed in jail, imo. It's obvious that the Akeos were coerced into signing whatever documents they signed to get out of prison. I hope the Akeos sue the crap out of these guys and win.

Bill
 
TUGBrian said:
and just when you thought that story had run its course....

now the couple is suing the resort!

nypost.com

Exclusive | Michigan couple held in Mexican prison for a month over timeshare dispute claims resort ‘weaponized’ criminal justice system

Paul and Christy Akeo claim Palace Resorts LLC brought bogus criminal charges to retaliate against them.
nypost.com nypost.com
Click to expand...
I see that the suit was filed in Miami-Dade county. Merits aside, I am curious how that court would have jurisdiction. Does the timeshare have business interests located in the US? If not I would imagine that it would be difficult to enforce any judgements against the resort. Also surprised to see the papers they signed included a provision that they "arbitrate any further dispute in the International Court of Arbitration in Canada." I had no idea that Canada had a court with international jurisdiction over arbitration.
 
sponger76 said:
I see that the suit was filed in Miami-Dade county. Merits aside, I am curious how that court would have jurisdiction. Does the timeshare have business interests located in the US? If not I would imagine that it would be difficult to enforce any judgements against the resort. Also surprised to see the papers they signed included a provision that they "arbitrate any further dispute in the International Court of Arbitration in Canada." I had no idea that Canada had a court with international jurisdiction over arbitration.
Click to expand...
So if they signed something indicating they would arbitrate, how can a court take this on? Won't the court in Miami-Dade just toss the lawsuit since they agreed to arbitration? I would just be happy to be out of jail and move on with life. They likely won't get anything from any judgement and can certainly would never want to go back to Mexico at this point.
 
sponger76 said:
I see that the suit was filed in Miami-Dade county. Merits aside, I am curious how that court would have jurisdiction. Does the timeshare have business interests located in the US? If not I would imagine that it would be difficult to enforce any judgements against the resort. Also surprised to see the papers they signed included a provision that they "arbitrate any further dispute in the International Court of Arbitration in Canada." I had no idea that Canada had a court with international jurisdiction over arbitration.
Click to expand...
I think the resort company has some kind of presence in Florida (from memory, might be wrong) but I am sure their assets are in Mexico and any US court victory would be difficult to enforce.

My recollection of this case was that there was no shortage of bad behavior by both parties in the dispute. I'm with @dioxide45, I'd want to put it behind me and move on, especially if my hands were not completely clean. This case seems like tilting at windmills from what I can see.

The story in the article which @TUGBrian linked appears to give the Akeo's side of the story, and is very different from previous accounts which were clearly the resort's version of events. My guess is that the real truth is somewhere in between, with dirty hands on both sides.

My take is that the couple found a lucrative loophole they were using to scam the resort, and after a while the resort closed the loophole, so the couple stopped paying and disputed the credit card charges (they only wanted the timeshare if they could exploit that unintended loophole.) Then the resort company went after them with criminal charges and indeed used their local influence to get them arrested on entry to the country.

Seems like no lessons were learned here.
 
dioxide45 said:
So if they signed something indicating they would arbitrate, how can a court take this on? Won't the court in Miami-Dade just toss the lawsuit since they agreed to arbitration? I would just be happy to be out of jail and move on with life. They likely won't get anything from any judgement and can certainly would never want to go back to Mexico at this point.
Click to expand...

They court can take it up if they can prove their signature was obtained under duress and that seems to be their claim.
 
sponger76 said:
I see that the suit was filed in Miami-Dade county. Merits aside, I am curious how that court would have jurisdiction. Does the timeshare have business interests located in the US? If not I would imagine that it would be difficult to enforce any judgements against the resort. Also surprised to see the papers they signed included a provision that they "arbitrate any further dispute in the International Court of Arbitration in Canada." I had no idea that Canada had a court with international jurisdiction over arbitration.
Click to expand...
Presumably, the initial signatures of both parties to the contract were given willingly, not under duress.

It's common on many contracts to include the region where arbitration or lawsuits are to be filed and which statutes apply. Since both parties initially signed the contract, these terms are binding. You could write a contract with your next-door neighbor stating that suits or arbitration will take place at and under the statutes of Paris, France or Kyiv, Ukraine.
 
Also the Arbitration Clause has to be written in a manner that can be enforced. Wyndumb Contracts require Binding Arbitration. A couple years ago Wyndumb was sued in Florida in Federal Court. Wyndumb successfully moved to Dismiss citing the Binding Arbitraton Clause. When the Dispute was submitted to the American Arbitration Association for Resolution AAA declined to accept the case because of how the Wyndumb Attorneys drafted the Clause. (So apparently the Wyndumb Attorneys are not the best around.) The case went back to Federal Court.
 
Last edited:
Larry M said:
Presumably, the initial signatures of both parties to the contract were given willingly, not under duress.
Click to expand...

To me, being placed in a Mexican prison for a civil suit is more than enough to prove duress.

Bill
 
Larry M said:
Presumably, the initial signatures of both parties to the contract were given willingly, not under duress.
Click to expand...

I believe the very argument of the lawsuit is that it was done under duress.
If that can be proven in court, the arbitration clause contained in such an agreement will become irrelevant.

My question is: even if they can prove that, what will they get? Does the resort have assets in the USA or will they attempt to try to get a court in Mexico to enforce it. Or maybe they will keep the judgement open in the USA in perpetuity thereby preventing the company from acquiring or creating any substantial assets in the USA that could then be subject to seizure. I hope they have an end game here and are not just throwing more money away due to their anger.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top