• Welcome to the FREE TUGBBS forums! The absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 32 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 32 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 32nd anniversary: Happy 32nd Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    All subscribers auto-entered to win all free TUG membership giveaways!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Wish you could meet up with other TUG members? Well look no further as this annual event has been going on for years in Orlando! How to Attend the TUG January Get-Together!
  • Now through the end of the year you can join or renew your TUG membership at the lowest price ever offered! Learn More!
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

You're Being Lied to About Electric Cars

So when you enter a parking lot it just chooses a random available space? I agree that I would want to select a particular location, especially if, for example, it were raining and I saw a spot close to the entrance or if it were at night and I wanted to park directly below a light, etc.

Yes it’s kinda random at present. For example, sometimes it will pick a parking spot away from other vehicles, sometimes farther away from the storefront sometimes right up close. Sometimes it pulls into the space and sometimes it backs into the space. I haven’t been able to define a pattern as yet. This is a new feature that was just added to the FSD stack in v14 though, so like any other newly added feature, it will improve over time. Another preference I’d like to see is whether to pull in or back in, and I’d like these preferences to be location specific. So for example, at a grocery store location, I’d prefer pulling into the parking space forward, so we get easy access to the trunk when loading groceries. The system already memorizes your parking preference per location, in so far as curbside, street parking, driveway, etc., so I expect more parking configuration options to become available in future dot releases.

Eventually, I’d expect Grok voice integration to allow for what you mention, to allow the driver to provide explicit guidance on parking preferences when pulling into the lot. Such as, please park under a light and closer to the storefront since it’s dark and raining. The car would then tell FSD what to do. Today, it cannot do this via the AI integration. You can use AI to change navigation points, find restaurants, find chargers, pretty much any edit or change to the navigation system that you want, but you cannot use it for explicit parking lot preferences today.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Ours picks a spot right in front of the gym when we go. Personally, I like to park further away so I usually take the wheel in a parking lot.

Yep, I don’t like parking in a crowded lot, don’t like door dings. I’d prefer to walk a little further and park away from other vehicles. I’m probably used to this since I drive a full sized truck though, which generally requires more space than most other vehicles.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Yep, I don’t like parking in a crowded lot, don’t like door dings. I’d prefer to walk a little further and park away from other vehicles. I’m probably used to this since I drive a full sized truck though, which generally requires more space than most other vehicles.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You would like the placement of the newest Tesla supercharger area located at the far corner of the grocery store property. It's like 200 yards from the doors. I never see anyone using these. There are two new oil change facilities and a new car wash within a couple of blocks from the supercharger that are usually packed with customers.

Bill
 
The question is - is this real, and at the stage claimed?

If so, the only question I have left is the safety question. If it meets my safety criteria, and is real, then this meets my EV requirements.


We shall see. . . .
 
The question is - is this real, and at the stage claimed?

If so, the only question I have left is the safety question. If it meets my safety criteria, and is real, then this meets my EV requirements.


We shall see. . . .
I try and stay up to date on battery technology, and I have never heard of this company before

Here is more information on the company


They have unveiled these batteries at CES 26 so they are not being shy about their achievements

If they are really doing what they claim

It will change the worldwide battery market COMPLETELY

This is the story from CNET


Here is the motorcycle with the "Donut Hub"

Grok can find very little additional information
They apparently are owned by the motorcycle company they are powering
The first mention of them is in 2019 when they talked about the electric motor in the bike

There will be a flurry of repeats of the articles for the next 24 hours so it will be hard to find further material as the search engines will just regurgitate what we have already heard
 
Last edited:
The question we all have
Is it real or
Is he just playing a role to keep the clicks coming
We will probably have to continue to guess at the answer
I don't think he is intentionally trolling, his posts are just a result of how he thinks. In his mind if he thinks something, that thing is a real, actual fact. End of analysis. Here is a good example:


I think that if you were actually driving, you would have seen the pothole that was large enough to damage your car regardless of the road condition. I think that many, if not most cars driving though the same area that you were, made it through with no damage.
[...]

Bill
So Bill:
- has never seen the pothole;
- has never been to the location of the pothole;
- doesn't know how Hitchicker71 was driving;
- doesn't know how visible the pothole is, and what surrounds it;
- doesn't know what other obstacles or traffic are on the roadway;
- knows nothing about if other vehicles (if any at all) have passed through the same area;
- knows nothing about what kind of vehicles these other drivers may have been driving;
- has no idea how attentive, if at all, such other drivers were.

And yet he thinks he knows what Hitchhiker71 and/or any other drivers through the same area did. He lacks any basis, factual support or other evidence of what actually happened there. It is one thing to suggest something as a possibility, be he posits his thoughts as actual fact. It is conspiracy-thought 101, reaching its height in and after 2020: I think, therefore it is.
 
Last edited:
I don't think he is intentionally trolling, his posts are just a result of how he thinks. In his mind if he thinks something, that thing is a real, actual fact. End of analysis. Here is a good example:



So Bill:
- has never seen the pothole;
- has never been to the location of the pothole;
- doesn't know how Hitchicker71 was driving;
- doesn't know how visible the pothole is, and what surrounds it;
- doesn't know what other obstacles or traffic are on the roadway;
- knows nothing about other vehicles (id any at all) passed through thesame area;
- knows nothing about what kind of vehicles these other drivers may have been driving;
- has no idea how attentive, if at all, such other drivers were.

And yet he thinks he knows what Hitchhiker71 and/or any other drivers through the same area did. He lacks any basis, factual support or other evidence of what actually happened there. It is one thing to suggest something as a possibility, be he posits his thoughts as actual fact. It is conspiracy-thought 101, reaching its height in and after 2020: I think, therefore it is.

You have done a great job of analyzing his process

He can be very lucid and understanding at times

Then he goes into the phase you are describing

I have decided it is not a fun use of my time and energy to be concerned with what easyrider is posting

If he starts posting dangerous and slanted misinformation about important topics, I will reconsider my position
 
The motorcycle seems to be real

If they have the battery they claim

Why would they even care about selling motorcycles

The. Battery company would be worth billions if it is what they claim
And that is with a B
You have to scale up, first. Tesla did not start with a Gigafactory for batteries. Show the world it's real and is being made is reasonable quantities, then increase production as the pre-orders grow. (Remember, CATL isn't <that> far behind. . . )
 
Last edited:
I don't think he is intentionally trolling, his posts are just a result of how he thinks. In his mind if he thinks something, that thing is a real, actual fact. End of analysis. Here is a good example:



So Bill:
- has never seen the pothole;
- has never been to the location of the pothole;
- doesn't know how Hitchicker71 was driving;
- doesn't know how visible the pothole is, and what surrounds it;
- doesn't know what other obstacles or traffic are on the roadway;
- knows nothing about if other vehicles (if any at all) have passed through the same area;
- knows nothing about what kind of vehicles these other drivers may have been driving;
- has no idea how attentive, if at all, such other drivers were.

And yet he thinks he knows what Hitchhiker71 and/or any other drivers through the same area did. He lacks any basis, factual support or other evidence of what actually happened there. It is one thing to suggest something as a possibility, be he posits his thoughts as actual fact. It is conspiracy-thought 101, reaching its height in and after 2020: I think, therefore it is.


That's funny Dave. Yes, I've seen and have both hit and avoided potholes with my hands on the wheel. Yes, the location 9f the pothole was disclosed. Hitchhiker claims to be driving hands-free. Hitchhiker saw the pothole so it was visible. Regular traffic is what seems reasonable. According to @WaikikiFirst there are many ev and regular cars mixed. My guess is that more drivers missed the pothole than hit it.

I think my interpretation of the event aligns with Hitchhiker. I'm not sure why this is a fact to you. It is 9nly a probability t9 me.

Bill
 
You gave to scale up, first. Tesla did not start with a Gigafactory for batteries. Show the world it's real and is being made is reasonable quantities, then increase production as the pre-orders grow. (Remember, CATL isn't <that> far behind. . . )
The announcement about the battery technology has certainly given them plenty of publicity about the motorcycle

The company and motorcycle are splashed over every tech news site I drift through on a daily basis

I guess we will wait to hear more about the battery
 
That's funny Dave. Yes, I've seen and have both hit and avoided potholes with my hands on the wheel. Yes, the location 9f the pothole was disclosed. Hitchhiker claims to be driving hands-free. Hitchhiker saw the pothole so it was visible. Regular traffic is what seems reasonable. According to @WaikikiFirst there are many ev and regular cars mixed. My guess is that more drivers missed the pothole than hit it.

I think my interpretation of the event aligns with Hitchhiker. I'm not sure why this is a fact to you. It is 9nly a probability t9 me.

Bill
That is sad you think it is funny Bill. But at least you now acknowledge that your thoughts are just a guess.
 
That is sad you think it is funny Bill. But at least you now acknowledge that your thoughts are just a guess.

I would call it slightly amusing rather than sad. You are right if you think that probabilities based on a narrative could be considered a guess. Maybe even a "best guess",lol. 🙈🙉🙊

Bill
 
Last edited:
Here is a video from a founder of Donut and the new battery

He certainly makes a strong statement

If it is real

The Battery world will change dramatically


 
When I think Mercedes I think over engineered, unreliable , costly repairs, fast depreciation and owning only under warranty. Maybe it's better as an ev but I doubt it.

It is definitely interesting. Do you think this is better than Teslas fsd ?

Bill
Considering no one is using it yet - that question is impossible to answer. Seeing a couple pre-recorded videos by NVidia doesn't really matter - what matters is the real world experiences on roadways all around the US, and that real world experience remains to be seen. In comparison, real people use FSD in Tesla vehicles every moment of every day, to the tune of over 7 billion miles and counting. It also remains to be seen just how "good" VLA really is when trained only on synthetic data as opposed to real world data. As Musk just said yesterday, the long between 99-100% of edge cases is much more difficult to solve for than many seem to believe, including Nvidia, but only time will tell. Nvidia is one of the few companies on the planet that can innovate as quickly as Tesla from an engineering standpoint, and as we all know, competition is always a good thing. One of the features that I've always wanted with FSD, that the Nvidia solution apparently has, is the ability to take over control and not disable the FSD software in the process - you simply override the system - and it allows you to do so - then immediately takes over when you go hands-free again. Features like this may push Tesla to adopt similar featuresets that are missing from the FSD stack today, in order to compete better. Again, only time will tell, but I for one am glad Nvidia is entering this space and that legacy manufacturers are adopting this platform as soon as Q1 2026.
 

Norway Just Reached 96% Electric Car Sales and Gas Is Basically Over​



But I thought EVs don't work in cold climates? :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
(which is a common lie spread by ignorant EV haters, which was the original theme of this 2600+ post thread)

Kurt
Policy mix-ups are behind it with steep purchase taxes on combustion cars, generous exemptions for EVs, cheaper tolls and ferries, plus abundant home and public charging. After years of that pressure, Norway effectively hit its long-standing goal of ending fossil new-car sales by 2025.

So the government and the taxpayer are "fueling" it. Norway also has a massive oil economy which is likely providing the electricity.
 
Policy mix-ups are behind it with steep purchase taxes on combustion cars, generous exemptions for EVs, cheaper tolls and ferries, plus abundant home and public charging. After years of that pressure, Norway effectively hit its long-standing goal of ending fossil new-car sales by 2025.

So the government and the taxpayer are "fueling" it. Norway also has a massive oil economy which is likely providing the electricity.

Norway’s energy production mix is dominated by hydropower, with more than 99% of its electricity coming from low‑carbon sources
primarily hydro (~90%)
wind (~9%)
making it one of the cleanest grids in the world.


Norway is also a major global producer of oil and natural gas
But almost all of that is exported rather than used for domestic electricity.
 
Last edited:
Policy mix-ups are behind it with steep purchase taxes on combustion cars, generous exemptions for EVs, cheaper tolls and ferries, plus abundant home and public charging. After years of that pressure, Norway effectively hit its long-standing goal of ending fossil new-car sales by 2025.

So the government and the taxpayer are "fueling" it. Norway also has a massive oil economy which is likely providing the electricity.
No argument that incentives have driven the EV shift (it mentioned that in the article I posted), but the old, tired argument that EVs are not viable in cold weather environments is BS.

Kurt
 
Considering no one is using it yet - that question is impossible to answer. Seeing a couple pre-recorded videos by NVidia doesn't really matter - what matters is the real world experiences on roadways all around the US, and that real world experience remains to be seen. In comparison, real people use FSD in Tesla vehicles every moment of every day, to the tune of over 7 billion miles and counting. It also remains to be seen just how "good" VLA really is when trained only on synthetic data as opposed to real world data. As Musk just said yesterday, the long between 99-100% of edge cases is much more difficult to solve for than many seem to believe, including Nvidia, but only time will tell. Nvidia is one of the few companies on the planet that can innovate as quickly as Tesla from an engineering standpoint, and as we all know, competition is always a good thing. One of the features that I've always wanted with FSD, that the Nvidia solution apparently has, is the ability to take over control and not disable the FSD software in the process - you simply override the system - and it allows you to do so - then immediately takes over when you go hands-free again. Features like this may push Tesla to adopt similar featuresets that are missing from the FSD stack today, in order to compete better. Again, only time will tell, but I for one am glad Nvidia is entering this space and that legacy manufacturers are adopting this platform as soon as Q1 2026.
Now that fsd is being used there are videos showing fsd problems and fsd saving lives. I watched a short video of a cybertruck fsd reacting to save the occupant driver from a head on collision. That was impressive. The driver claims he couldnt react as fast as the fsd which is probally true.

Then there are videos of curbs and potholes where fsd seems to fail.

Bill
 
Norway’s energy production mix is dominated by hydropower, with more than 99% of its electricity coming from low‑carbon sources
primarily hydro (~90%)
wind (~9%)
making it one of the cleanest grids in the world.


Norway is also a major global producer of oil and natural gas
But almost all of that is exported rather than used for domestic electricity.

I

Yep. The nationalized oil companies in Norway fund the generous social safety net programs in place. Given the large amount of oil reserves and small overall territory and population, this approach works well for them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top