- Joined
- Oct 31, 2022
- Messages
- 2,857
- Reaction score
- 2,136
- Location
- Southern Tier NY
- Resorts Owned
- HGVC Seaworld
Wyndham Smoky Mountains
Foxrun Lake Lure
Gatlinburg Town Square
Grandview Points
I think you're probably right - as you get further away from a fixed week fixed unit, you have less and less direct relationship to any damage or costs. Maybe if I own at a resort as a UDI I care a tiny bit about extra costs, but generally it's going to be like a smaller version of a trust ownership - any "assessments" get spread out over such a large group that I'm "risking" a penny or something. And why would an exchanger (lets face it, that's what you are in points systems outside of the home resort, and what all trust owners basically are) really care at all? Their MFs aren't at risk if some other resort has higher costs. Trust owners again have increased costs spread out so much that again, any one resort, or even if you're an extra cost in all resorts, it's like a couple cents a year realistically.I'm not sure if this is tongue in cheek but in case it isn't, I don't agree. I've seen no evidence and had no feedback from any GM I've asked (2 or 3) or any front desk (asked there probably 5 or 6 times) that supports the idea that owner, renter, etc makes any difference on treatment of the resort. The only group that anyone has ever been mentioned as standing out in this regard is a spring break type of crowd. Granted these discussions have been center more around damages to a unit but I think we can reasonably extrapolate. Even for owners, the villas are essentially a rental car. I think it'd only make a difference for a fixed unit situation but other than that I do not believe it makes any difference at all. I think most people are reasonable and honest overall but some aren't and I believe it's the character not the ownership that makes a difference. If anything, owners sometimes seem entitled more than others, especially those that have owned for a longer period of time.