I think what MVC owners are saying though, is that same language has been in the fine print for the last 12 years. MVC had/has the same incentives to play loose with inventory from the legacy MVC weeks system as they supposedly do with the legacy VSN system, but they seem to prioritize demand balancing since both the DC points system and the legacy weeks system both have happy owners/users. It's true that adding Abound will add one more bucket for the inventory managers to allocate VSN inventory to, but that's OK if they allocate based on demand. I know VSN owners are getting tired of hearing MVC owners compare this transition to the DC transition in 2010, but there are parallels.
Sales will continue to feed the fear that VSN will evaporate in their push to make the new sale, just as they have been saying for 12 years that the MVC weeks system is dead. But we can still book our prime time whale season weeks at Maui Ocean Club and Waiohai, and while we don't use II ourselves any more, many TUGgers do, so the legacy MVC weeks system is still alive and well. In fact, 40% of MVC owners still don't use the points system.
I don't think the loss of some benefits, particularly for the VSN Elite members, is overblown. For those owners that value the benefits they have used that are going away, the loss is certainly real. Where I think there is unwarranted concern, however, is the fear that Marriott will play fast and loose with inventory management. If they were inclined to do that, I think we would have seen more degradation in the legacy MVC weeks system over the years. While some will point out some changes in weeks availability around the margins, by and large, the MVC weeks system still works.