• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 31st anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

[ Thread is unlocked ] Megarenter Rap Lawsuit

This argument is not accurate. EVERY purchase has to be approved by Wyndham. I literally did not say they purchased developer points. I’m not stupid. But if Wyndham approves of the transaction, they condone it, and therefore your point is just about not addressing the question I posed.

IIRC ROFR was not in many of the contracts prior to 2012 timeframe - so in the case of the majority of megarenters that have been playing this game for much longer - I don’t believe Wyndham actually has the ability you are referring to here. That said - I don’t doubt that the Wyndham of old looked the other way to some extent - but the new Wyndham under the new leadership clearly has different objectives.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
And yes, if the current restrictions and corresponding account suspensions do not work - further restrictions will be considered without a doubt, regarding your reference to eliminating GCs for example.

I guess the big question is, why don't they just do a big 2016 style account suspension on all the mega renters, cancel their reservations, and let the rest sort itself out. They obviously have the analytics to know who these people are and who to selectively target. It should be easy enough to see who has BC/GC/OW/NOLA "booked out" on certain dates.

I think it's been made pretty obvious there are not a huge number of these people running the table with million of points.
 
Out of pure curiosity, do you own select at Ocean Walk, or CWA? My guess would be that it’s easier to book bike week with Ocean Walk deeded than CWA, but I don’t mind being proven wrong. (I assume midnight at 13 months in either case.)
I'm deeded (525K developer and 154K resale points) at Ocean Walk. By 7AM the 2 and 3 bedroom units are gone, leaving me with having to book multiple one bedroom units for my party.
 
I'm deeded (525K developer and 154K resale points) at Ocean Walk. By 7AM the 2 and 3 bedroom units are gone, leaving me with having to book multiple one bedroom units for my party.

That is the luck of the draw or poor planning or execution.
 
I'm deeded (525K developer and 154K resale points) at Ocean Walk. By 7AM the 2 and 3 bedroom units are gone, leaving me with having to book multiple one bedroom units for my party.
You couldn't get one 2BR booked 13 months in advance?
 
So... what's the deal? Why support mega renters?
Imagine you have a house at vacation location and instead of you going there you you rent it out. There is no difference between somone renting it out and the owner going there. The owner has the right to rent it out Becuase they own the house… just like how they own points. But imagine the city that this house is in says no more rentals cause the city is getting busy. Even though it would be just as busy if the owner went there instead of a renter. This is what wyndam is doing. Then their is the argument that without these mega renters it would be easier to book a reservation this is not true. Just because the mega renter isn’t booking the room does not mean that you will get it… without the mega renters there would still be the same amount of points but more widely dispersed causing even more competition to book a room this isn’t a issue mega renters caused but a issue wyndam caused by creating so many points.
 
That is the luck of the draw or poor planning or execution.
If I can't book a reservation, but I can rent a bunch of them, it's not being unlucky or poor planning, it greed by a bunch of mega renters. I'm thankful it's coming to an end.
 
I would say that it would be Wyndham owners using their rights to the time at the resort in both cases, though the rented ones are for a different use than the ones with an owner staying on a reservation made with their own points. Wyndham has always had the right to set out restrictions in this regard and has done a poor job at it based on all available evidence. I believe the latest effort only addresses the margins still.

actually the use is exactly the same: folks enjoying a vacation
What several fail to realize is when mega renters basically take over a resort ALL availability is gone. A mega renter takes over 90% of the units for a high demand time they control their own upgrades. The mega renter cancels a 4 bedroom they have well over a 90% chance to the auto upgrade or have patterned when the cancelled unit comes back. That’s what most miss on equal chance at reservations. Mega renter cancels 4 bedroom PR unit at 60 days it‘s nearly 100% chance it’ll be their upgrade.

The mega renter has basically tied up the entire resort until inside the 60 day window. The average owner has already given up on that resort so choose a different resort to go to. The mega renter has cancelled & upgraded all the 3&4 bedroom units. So they cancel a non rented studio at 17 days out, what good is that for a family with kids?

Do mega renters basically take over resorts at times? It’s a fact yes they do & it has been reported by some here in this forum. A well known member basically took over a resort for Mardi Gras so if you wanted to stay there you had no other choice than to rent from them. Another member here reported another resort was around 95% renters for Thanksgiving. By controlling the upgrades it creates more points left for them to make more reservations than what their ownership supports.

Do you want 100 happy owners for a weekend or 1 mega renter?
Now you have done it.... You have gone and poked the bear...

You can go ahead and use my name. I think anyone thats been around here any length of time knows who you are talking about

The thing is, you dont know what you are talking about. And if you are going to argue that this mega renter, took over a resort to make your argument against renting...you lose.

First La Belle Maison ... There are 134 units at this property. When I was active you had to call in at exactly 8am, 13 months ahead of check in to get a Mardi Gras reservation, and then as now you had to own either CWA points or La Belle Maison points to get an ARP reservation I owned both My problem was that by the time I finished making my reservations using La Belle Maison points the CWA reservations were gone... so I uses all my La Belle Maison points for Mardi Gras reservations.. I went for the 4 night reservations ahead of Mardi Gras Tuesday, (Fri, Sat, Sun and Mon). There were very few 2 bedroom units at the resort, so I didnt even try for them.. I would make one studio reservation and as many one bedrooms as I could. To get them all I would need about about 15 million LBM points, I had less than 4 mm, but remember that I wasnt the only person on the phone and the reservations clerk I was talking to, wasnt the only one working. So what would happen is that the reservations were gone before I was able to use all my points.. I would generally get 10 + reservations...I never got as many as 20... so 10% maybe...hardly control

Avenue Plaza has 264 units..(i think). A big chunk of those units are Worldmark units.. I owned some Worldmark credits, but thats not under discussion here, another big piece of the resort was deeded weeks, sold by the guy (Mr John) that converted the property to timeshares. Some of those weeks had been converted to points but could only be used in the ARP window for the week noted on the deed, some were no doubt Mardi Gras, but not many... I owned two dedicated Mardi Gras weeks not converted to points, but .. also not under discussion. Any weeks unsold by Mr John were taken over by Wyndham after Mr John died. and as near as I can tell, the ones not put into Worldmark, went into CWA.

So at 13 months I used my CWA points for as many Avenue Plaza reservations as possible... But remember I started on the phone working with my La Belle Maison points... By the time we got to Avenue Plaza they were gone.
I never understood why, but there were always some Mardi Gras reservations available at 10 months... Not many and you had to be quick, but I always got a couple then.. Bottom line using Wyndham points at Avenue Plaza I might have 5 Mardi Gras reservations

since we are talking about control, lets look at all of Wyndham and all of my ownerships... out of about 400 units I could get at best 50 reservations or
12% (and most of them were Worldmark) thats not enough to control anything. You might say I was lucky to get that...

and dont think cancel and rebook and upgrade increases the number of reservations. If anything Id lose a reservation or two in the 60 day window And there was no such loophole with worldmark or the weeks ownerships, At LaBelle, if I was lucky , Id start with 10 one bedroom reservations and one studio and end up with 10 one bedrooms at half the studio price and one half price studio.. Nice to be sure, but still only 11 units to rent. (the points I got back doing the cancel and rebook thing couldnt be used for Mardi Gras,, those reservations were already taken.. I did use them for other things, but usually I just flipped them for cost to a points manager










This argument is not accurate. EVERY purchase has to be approved by Wyndham. I literally did not say they purchased developer points. I’m not stupid. But if Wyndham approves of the transaction, they condone it, and therefore your point is just about not addressing the question I posed.

also consider that every point purchased on the secondary market was sold by Wyndham at full price originally. Wyndham strips the VIP benefit upon resale...how fair is that??
 
Imagine you have a house at vacation location and instead of you going there you you rent it out. There is no difference between somone renting it out and the owner going there. The owner has the right to rent it out Becuase they own the house… just like how they own points. But imagine the city that this house is in says no more rentals cause the city is getting busy. Even though it would be just as busy if the owner went there instead of a renter. This is what wyndam is doing. Then their is the argument that without these mega renters it would be easier to book a reservation this is not true. Just because the mega renter isn’t booking the room does not mean that you will get it… without the mega renters there would still be the same amount of points but more widely dispersed causing even more competition to book a room this isn’t a issue mega renters caused but a issue wyndam caused by creating so many points.
There is no justification for taking over a resort other than greed. It's not the same and you know it. This is more accurate: If you and your brother own a property and he rented it to a stranger, you can't use it even though you own it, and he kept the money for himself. Bottom line, no commercial activity is the policy and Wyndham is coming down on those who abused it. Amen.
 
From what I am reading these “mega renters” have made this their job. This is how they make money just like how everyone else finds a way to make money. So if they work for their money how is it a “free ride”. Everyone has to find a way to make money. I believe many of you are just jellous you have not thought of this way.
Not only do megarenters work for their money, The pay maintenance fees too.. I was paying about 20k/month
 
I'm deeded (525K developer and 154K resale points) at Ocean Walk. By 7AM the 2 and 3 bedroom units are gone, leaving me with having to book multiple one bedroom units for my party.
I can’t help but ask why you’re waiting until 7am?

There are multiple time I’ve booked something at 10 months at midnight when there was nothing remaining available later when I got up at 6-7 am.

In the decade since I’ve been an owner, when people ask whether ARP is necessary, the conventional answer here (and before that, where I started on the ATOZED Wyndham forum) has been essentially, “Not really, except for certain high-demand weeks - Mardi Gras in New Orleans, Bike Week in Daytona, a 3 or 4 bedroom presidential at Bonnet Creek for Thanksgiving or Christmas, Myrtle Beach in summer (except sometimes Ocean Boulevard).” I can’t conceive of owing ARP at one of the highest demand weeks in the Wyndham system and then hoping something’s available 7 hours later.
 
If I were looking for an in-demand reservation at the 10-month (or 13-month) mark, I'd be checking from exactly the minute they were available, not seven hours later.

Thanks to Wyndham enforcing the policy, I guess I don't have to worry about that anymore
 
The guy has 67M points. That's equivalent to 375 180,000 point contracts. Maintenance fees must be $500,000. Crazy. Not a fan of mega renters at all. But this guy invested a ton in the system and now they are changing the rules. He may have a case. I almost want to route for him for beating Wyndham at their own game. The lies of the sales weasels may catch up to them. "In 2020, Wyndham canceled a “significant number” of reservations made by the plaintiffs, saying they violated the company’s policy on “engaging in commercial activity,” according to the complaint. But commercial activity was the reason the Klebbas were told to buy the points in the first place, the suit says."
 
  • Like
Reactions: am1
I'm deeded (525K developer and 154K resale points) at Ocean Walk. By 7AM the 2 and 3 bedroom units are gone, leaving me with having to book multiple one bedroom units for my party.
How many GC's are you using for the multiple 1br units in the party? That many friends and family? Are you receiving any compensation for those key reservations? Are you renting out units??????? Might you also be part of the problem?
 
If I can't book a reservation, but I can rent a bunch of them, it's not being unlucky or poor planning, it greed by a bunch of mega renters. I'm thankful it's coming to an end.

That is the luck of the draw or poor planning or execution.

What they are saying is that if you are not online at 12:01am at exactly the 13 month mark booking your suite, you didn't plan properly and that's tough luck.

I think some of you are seeing the issue now. It's "tough luck" and "poor planning", not greedy, wanna-be travel agents playing internet slum lord from their laptop in the middle of the night...

@am1 way to try to get people on your side, lol... keep it up
 
If I can't book a reservation, but I can rent a bunch of them, it's not being unlucky or poor planning, it greed by a bunch of mega renters. I'm thankful it's coming to an end.

If it's that important, why do you wait until 7 AM? When you snooze, you lose.
 
Especially if Wyndham was covering the cost of the points difference for the discounts and upgrades on the non-VIP eligible resale points.
Is it 60 days before a reservation date that Wyndham,by the contract can simply take the points?

Sent from my Lenovo TB-X606F using Tapatalk
 
Not only do megarenters work for their money, The pay maintenance fees too.. I was paying about 20k/month
I hear you, but its really changing the model to almost a franchise and makes it difficult for the "everyday family" to get the rooms they want and have invested in. People that want to be in the hospitality business should invest in a hotel. If Wyndham allows this and it prevents others from gaining access to rooms, then the "risk" of mega renters should be disclosed during purchase. Still, it doesn't seem fair to change the rules midstream for those like you that have invested time and money to create a business.
 
If it's that important, why do you wait until 7 AM? When you snooze, you lose.
Owners didn't sign up to complete against a business to gain access to a resort they paid for. I can image these mega renters have banks of phones and employees lined up making reservations at 6:00AM. Really a tough situation for all involved.
 
N
It does ruin someone's vacation if the resort is taken over by mega renters and availability is nil during certain timeframes. I speak from experience. I can't reserve a unit at 13 months out with my points, but I can rent it from someone for a lot more than the cost of my points. This is why I'm elated Wyndham is enforcing the no commerce activity policy. Mega renters have caused enough damage. Their actions caused the lost of some VIP benefits over the years, not to mention depriving owners of reservations at prime resorts and prime timeframes.
no question that Wyndham in fighting off the megarenters has changed the rules to the detriment of all owners. But thats Wyndham, not the megarenters. Wyndham could have just brought down the hammer all at once, (like they finally did with me and Adam). But no they went after this with one fee, and one rule change at a time. Fees and changes that applied to all owners, Think about it, If Wyndham takes an action to cut my profit in half, what my reaction going to be, Wyndham thought we would go out of business rather than work for half the money.. Some did, but some doubled up. If Im making $100000 doing 100 reservations a year, at $1000 profit each. and you cut me back to $500 each. My reaction should be obvious.. Ill make 200 reservations


If you cant get your reservation at 13 months there is something wrong with you
Using a hypothetical 100 room resort as an example, If there are 100 owners going on line for reservations, and if the megarenter wants 10 reservations he is only going to get one. because as he is making his first reservation, the other 99 owners are making their reservations.. When the megarenter igoesfor his second reservation, he wont get it because, they will all be gone
 
If you cant get your reservation at 13 months there is something wrong with you
Using a hypothetical 100 room resort as an example, If there are 100 owners going on line for reservations, and if the megarenter wants 10 reservations he is only going to get one. because as he is making his first reservation, the other 99 owners are making their reservations.. When the megarenter igoesfor his second reservation, he wont get it because, they will all be gone
That's not a fair statement. I've been on exactly at 6:00 and had Kona sold out before I could submit the reservation. Maybe they need to limit the number of reservations one person can make in a single day.
 
...

According to the complaint, the plaintiffs were lured into buying points with the promise that they could rent them out to generate income, allowing non-timeshare owners to stay at Wyndham resorts.

...

The guy has 67M points. That's equivalent to 375 180,000 point contracts. Maintenance fees must be $500,000. Crazy. Not a fan of mega renters at all. But this guy invested a ton in the system and now they are changing the rules. He may have a case. I almost want to route for him for beating Wyndham at their own game. The lies of the sales weasels may catch up to them. "In 2020, Wyndham canceled a “significant number” of reservations made by the plaintiffs, saying they violated the company’s policy on “engaging in commercial activity,” according to the complaint. But commercial activity was the reason the Klebbas were told to buy the points in the first place, the suit says."

This lawsuit sounds like a rerun of the 2012 Sirmon v. Wyndham lawsuit that involved a 23,000,000 points VIP account.


"Plaintiffs allege that, notwithstanding these prohibitions, Wyndham sales representatives regularly promoted rental when encouraging them to make additional purchases. Plaintiffs' allegation is supported by the testimony of several former Wyndham employees, who testified that, with encouragement from management, sales representatives would discuss: (1) specific amounts owners could expect to receive from renting (Martin Depo., Doc. 146–7 at 222); (2) the likelihood of being able to rent (Bonds Depo., Doc. 146–11 at 31); (3) third-party experiences about amounts owners could expect to receive from renting ( id. at 53); and (4) that the owner can cover expenses and maintenance fees from revenue generated by renting. ( Id. at 33.) Former Wyndham employee Paul Bonds testified that the “rental pitch” was used the entire time he was employed by Wyndham. (Bonds Depo., Doc. 146–11 at 32.) Further, when asked who at Wyndham was aware the rental pitch was being used, Bonds stated: “Everybody, all staff, salespeople, managers, director of sales, vice presidents, that's as far as I know, as high up as that.” ( Id. at 40.) Similarly, former Wyndham employee Tom Martin testified that “sales representatives were instructed by their managers to promise rental income to owners, sometimes in the thousandsof dollars.” (Martin Depo., Doc. 146–7 at 222.)"

And there was a bunch of other stuff about Wyndham's Megarenter presentations and changes to the VIP program.

The documents signed by the Sirmons at the various closings figured prominently in the case, and the case did not go well for the plaintiffs.
 
Last edited:
Think about it, If Wyndham takes an action to cut my profit in half, what my reaction going to be, Wyndham thought we would go out of business rather than work for half the money.. Some did, but some doubled up. If Im making $100000 doing 100 reservations a year, at $1000 profit each. and you cut me back to $500 each. My reaction should be obvious.. Ill make 200 reservations

This entitled attitude is really telling. Pay attention you all...

Maybe rather than try to find other ways to scam the system, some of you should find real jobs like the rest of us.

If you cant get your reservation at 13 months there is something wrong with you

See, at various points in the many threads on the subject, the narrative has been "I only make a very small percentage of bookings at ARP"... now the truth is coming out and the narrative is changing.

Using a hypothetical 100 room resort as an example, If there are 100 owners going on line for reservations, and if the megarenter wants 10 reservations he is only going to get one. because as he is making his first reservation, the other 99 owners are making their reservations.. When the megarenter igoesfor his second reservation, he wont get it because, they will all be gone

I'm guessing some of you have shared your Wyndham login with dozens of people who are online at midnight a few times a year to snipe these bookings. Be truthful, then talk to me about how an owner can compete with that.

There are so many levels of lies, deceit and downright hypocrisy layered in these various threads. I don't know how anyone without an obvious conflict of interest can support you people and your business practices...
 
That's not a fair statement. I've been on exactly at 6:00 and had Kona sold out before I could submit the reservation. Maybe they need to limit the number of reservations one person can make in a single day.

Eliminating, or severely limiting GC's will completely solve this problem. Completely. No workarounds.
 
Top