bnoble
TUG Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 12,518
- Reaction score
- 6,442
- Location
- The People's Republic of Ann Arbor
It seems like there are a few factors at work.
One: RCI just does more volume. With more volume, there will be more screw-ups, even if they screw up no more often than anyone else.
Two: RCI has in the past been known to let members withdraw deposited units after the fact. We used to read about this here from time to time---some TUGger deposits, gets a poor trade power valuation, complains, and eventually gets their unit back, even though someone traded into it. The TUGger is really happy that "RCI did the right thing." But, someone else had a confirmed exchange cancelled on them at the same time, so maybe not so "right". IMO, if deposit is to be a final transaction, then it should be final. Hopefully, the new transparency rules will reduce this.
Three: in many cases, deposit confirmation seems to be a manual process. Each resort has its own system, and it seems like at least two different people handle each one---someone at the resort, and someone at RCI. It's not surprising that sometimes some things fall through the cracks---not checking that fees are current, getting the check-in date wrong, what have you. That's not acceptable, and it shouldn't happen, but people do make mistakes.
Four: sometimes, things go wrong that aren't the fault of RCI, the owner of the deposited week, or even the resort---if a unit has to be taken out of service for some unforeseen reason, then it has to be taken out of service. That's not always predictable, and there really is nothing you can do.
In the past folks have reported that RCI was very helpful in making things right when something like this happens---the "supervisor" assigned to the case generally tries to make the exchanger happy. And, that's as it should be---even when it isn't RCI's fault. It's unfortunate that the OP didn't really get a comparable unit, and it's possible that one just didn't exist, but if anyone finds themselves in this position, don't be shy about saying "that's not acceptable" if they give you an alternative that isn't up to snuff. Sometimes they can pull a rabbit out of a hat.
Finally, this has happened to me, but with a very happy outcome. I had exchanged into a 2BR at Powhatan. About a month later, RCI calls me, and leaves a message on my answering machine that there was a problem with my exchange, with the name and direct number of the supervisor assigned to my case. Fearing the worst, I called back, only to have the supervisor tell me that the owner made a mistake, and didn't want to deposit his lockoff as two 2BRs, but as one 4BR. So, she asked me if I was willing to accept the 4BR instead of a 2BR.
Um yeah, I *suppose* so, if I have to.
We had a nice week and were able to invite some friends along whom we had not seen in years. For a variety of reasons, they had not taken a vacation in quite some time, so it was a wonderful opportunity for us to give them that gift.
One: RCI just does more volume. With more volume, there will be more screw-ups, even if they screw up no more often than anyone else.
Two: RCI has in the past been known to let members withdraw deposited units after the fact. We used to read about this here from time to time---some TUGger deposits, gets a poor trade power valuation, complains, and eventually gets their unit back, even though someone traded into it. The TUGger is really happy that "RCI did the right thing." But, someone else had a confirmed exchange cancelled on them at the same time, so maybe not so "right". IMO, if deposit is to be a final transaction, then it should be final. Hopefully, the new transparency rules will reduce this.
Three: in many cases, deposit confirmation seems to be a manual process. Each resort has its own system, and it seems like at least two different people handle each one---someone at the resort, and someone at RCI. It's not surprising that sometimes some things fall through the cracks---not checking that fees are current, getting the check-in date wrong, what have you. That's not acceptable, and it shouldn't happen, but people do make mistakes.
Four: sometimes, things go wrong that aren't the fault of RCI, the owner of the deposited week, or even the resort---if a unit has to be taken out of service for some unforeseen reason, then it has to be taken out of service. That's not always predictable, and there really is nothing you can do.
In the past folks have reported that RCI was very helpful in making things right when something like this happens---the "supervisor" assigned to the case generally tries to make the exchanger happy. And, that's as it should be---even when it isn't RCI's fault. It's unfortunate that the OP didn't really get a comparable unit, and it's possible that one just didn't exist, but if anyone finds themselves in this position, don't be shy about saying "that's not acceptable" if they give you an alternative that isn't up to snuff. Sometimes they can pull a rabbit out of a hat.
Finally, this has happened to me, but with a very happy outcome. I had exchanged into a 2BR at Powhatan. About a month later, RCI calls me, and leaves a message on my answering machine that there was a problem with my exchange, with the name and direct number of the supervisor assigned to my case. Fearing the worst, I called back, only to have the supervisor tell me that the owner made a mistake, and didn't want to deposit his lockoff as two 2BRs, but as one 4BR. So, she asked me if I was willing to accept the 4BR instead of a 2BR.
Um yeah, I *suppose* so, if I have to.