I don't disagree with what is happening. I, have owned these for a long time ALONG WITH T&L. We both have felt the pains. I believe "someone

" has spent millions on this endeavor, and I applaud them.
I hope "like for like" means exactly that. I guess it may help if I explain how it worked early on.
I bought a great fixed week at one time. Unlike many, I read all the documents, covenants, by-laws, etc. before buying. I always bought "red" weeks (we called them red, white, and blue weeks. Mine were red weeks and I paid more for them because they were the best) Still, I knew that when it came down to it, in the end (because there was a sunset provision in the governing documents) we all get out exactly the same regardless of purchase value being red, white or blue. And that's all I expect now. (Which will be less than what I paid) We just spent millions fixing the place up. BRAVO! It makes them worth more! All I want from the deeded part is my percentage as spelled out in the founding documents. And yes, that is an option that I may have and there is no argument against that or the process. Folks, I understand this may be my choice and accept it. The underlying documents are clear! However, with a liquidation, my current deed actually does have residual value, no matter how little it turns out to be. CWA right of ownership will never have residual value.
Is that a fair swap? I don't think I'm good at explaining this, maybe someone who sees my point can give guidance. I'm not interested in getting what I originally paid in a liquidation,... not only would that violate the underlying documents, it's also unfair to Wyndham, (I bought a timeshare, Duh! I realize that and have always expected less in return!) just my share for sticking through this to the end. And the ability to continue on with a lesser valued underlying ownership. But if I continue, in essence, giving up my equity is like paying for my ownership again. Maybe you see that as unfair? Maybe you see this as fair since a liquidation is involved? Maybe this is already the plan?
Regarding my points, there were none back in those days. I had to pay Wyndham $2,395 (alot back then) for that deed to join the trust. Separate transactions, (years apart). So I'm not asking for anything free or that I didn't buy. Just the points option that I also paid for at one time. Is that fair?
My MF will be higher, but I accept that, as (which has already been reported) CWA gives me 13 month ARP, and I may be able to find larger rooms and keep us all together instead of multiple rooms! An offer I can't refuse! Good way to get owners on board!
I'm on board with what is going on! And am aware of the rumored options. Ownerships at these properties are all complicated ownerships, and I believe a partial reason this is happening is to get rid of this nonsense and simplify the programming, budgeting, and all the work to manage fixed weeks. It's will make Iife a whole lot easier for T&L, and I'm on board with them, I hope!
Correct. Not all deeds are worthless. Only the points are.