• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 31st anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

The Government Maintaining Commercial Interest in a Drug Under Development

WorldT

TUG Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2023
Messages
988
Reaction score
682
Okay, I know this links to a MJ discussion board but what do you think of this approach.
Normally, the government will provide grants but does not retain commercial interest or collect royalties if the drug makes it into production. The best that has always happened was the government gets a pre negotiated price on a pre-negotiated quantity (usually before production). That negotiation doesn't necessarily guarantee a good price (just priority) and after the initial quantity is done, there is no more benefit to the tax payer.

Synopsis: the State of Texas will provide funding to a group (University, hospital, drug company) to conduct studies and trials of a substance already in existence and apply for FDA approval. In return, the state gets a cut of every sale in perpetuity.

 
It's hard to say if the Legislation would hinder professionals that would use these types of treatments or if the Legislation would allow the creation of a medically accepted uniform dose of a psychedelic compound via a pharmaceutical drug. Would this be a first step to allow a DEA schedule 1 controlled substance to be used in a clinical setting ?

Bill
 
I don't think the legislation is regulating the use of the product.
That being said, I was not looking at it's effect on use of the product itself but rather, benefits to taxpayers who have funded quite a bit of primary and secondary research only to be left out of the profits if the product makes it to production.
 
The government takes in money from taxing the profits of the producer, taxes the wages of everyone involved in manufacturing, distribution, sales, etc., etc.
There is a return on the investment without a royalty on sales
 
Top