Okay, I know this links to a MJ discussion board but what do you think of this approach.
Normally, the government will provide grants but does not retain commercial interest or collect royalties if the drug makes it into production. The best that has always happened was the government gets a pre negotiated price on a pre-negotiated quantity (usually before production). That negotiation doesn't necessarily guarantee a good price (just priority) and after the initial quantity is done, there is no more benefit to the tax payer.
Synopsis: the State of Texas will provide funding to a group (University, hospital, drug company) to conduct studies and trials of a substance already in existence and apply for FDA approval. In return, the state gets a cut of every sale in perpetuity.
www.marijuanamoment.net
Normally, the government will provide grants but does not retain commercial interest or collect royalties if the drug makes it into production. The best that has always happened was the government gets a pre negotiated price on a pre-negotiated quantity (usually before production). That negotiation doesn't necessarily guarantee a good price (just priority) and after the initial quantity is done, there is no more benefit to the tax payer.
Synopsis: the State of Texas will provide funding to a group (University, hospital, drug company) to conduct studies and trials of a substance already in existence and apply for FDA approval. In return, the state gets a cut of every sale in perpetuity.

Texas Lawmakers Pass Ibogaine Bill That Gives State A Commercial Stake In Psychedelic Intellectual Property
The Texas legislature has passed a bill that would create a state-backed research consortium to conduct clinical trials on ibogaine as a possible treatment for substance use disorders and other mental health conditions, with the goal of developing a drug that would win U.S. Food and Drug...
