Shouldn’t the SA be separated out in its own line item instead of being lumped in to the Replacement Reserves?
I agree it probably should have been set out as an SA rather than an increase to the cash reserves.
The BOD should also have been out in front of this and communicated with owners so we could plan for the financial impact, especially at this time of year.
Perhaps Abound Points affect how best to allocate this extra expense. Maybe by putting it in the budget as part of the cash reserve it’s added into the calculations for Abound Points MF calculations. IOW, this is how it must be done so points owners who have access to Ocean Pointe share in the cost, even if it’s just a small amount. If it was just an SA, perhaps the cost would be shouldered solely by Ocean Pointe owners?
Still, if the BOD had been out in front of this with a notification of the additional cost BFORE leveling owners with a larger than expected bill, it would have relieved some anxiety and anger when I received the bill.
Now I want to know what their thinking is going forward. Is this a one off expense and my MF’s return to a more normal state next year? Is this going to be the norm going forward?
Perhaps now owners see why FL has their fully funded law that just be waived by owners each year. Had the resort been fully funded, we might not have seen this spike. Of course the MF’s would have been extraordinarily higher each year, so a one time shot line this isn’t necessarily so bad