I just got my newest copy of Timesharing Today. I always look forward to them and read them front to back except the for sale ads. This issue is about as negative toward exchange/trade as I have ever read. It leads with a story about points which doesn't cover some of the bigger names such as Hilton, Sunterra or Wyndham - some because they didn't reply to inquiries and some because they didn't ask them I guess.
That article alone is depressing. It covers how unnecessarily convoluted the systems are, how there are no published prices and how resale can be discouraged. And they really don't get into it much.
Complaints about II blocking access to regions, RCI fees. It goes on.
Then there are the letters to the editor and the articles on exchanging. The bottom line is a lot of griping about no availability, rentals undermining exchanges, travel agents that can rent to non-owners cheaper than annual fees, etc, etc. Somewhere it even says that the only way to enjoy timesharing is to own where you want to go.
Now that last statement I happen to be in full agreement with as I feel the years of buy to trade have led us to the situation where owners don't care about the resorts as they "only trade it" anyway and thus are willing to walk away from fees or practically give it away depressing resale values. But it is important to have a chance to exchange now and then as no one wants to go to the same place every single year forever. The exchange systems do seem to be falling apart. Weeks more than points but points seems to be trying to kill the goose by hiking costs, creating resale blocks and other customer unfriendly actions.
Anyway if I were a non-timeshare owner or if I had built my portfolio around trading I would finish my read of this issue in a really down mood. I can't ever recall feeling so negative about timesharing after reading that magazine even in the heydays of the Trust schemes and the upfront fees. It really makes me wonder if there is a future for exchange of any type going forward or if we just need to buy where we want to go over and over and strictly rent anything else. Anyone else find it so unnerving?
That article alone is depressing. It covers how unnecessarily convoluted the systems are, how there are no published prices and how resale can be discouraged. And they really don't get into it much.
Complaints about II blocking access to regions, RCI fees. It goes on.
Then there are the letters to the editor and the articles on exchanging. The bottom line is a lot of griping about no availability, rentals undermining exchanges, travel agents that can rent to non-owners cheaper than annual fees, etc, etc. Somewhere it even says that the only way to enjoy timesharing is to own where you want to go.
Now that last statement I happen to be in full agreement with as I feel the years of buy to trade have led us to the situation where owners don't care about the resorts as they "only trade it" anyway and thus are willing to walk away from fees or practically give it away depressing resale values. But it is important to have a chance to exchange now and then as no one wants to go to the same place every single year forever. The exchange systems do seem to be falling apart. Weeks more than points but points seems to be trying to kill the goose by hiking costs, creating resale blocks and other customer unfriendly actions.
Anyway if I were a non-timeshare owner or if I had built my portfolio around trading I would finish my read of this issue in a really down mood. I can't ever recall feeling so negative about timesharing after reading that magazine even in the heydays of the Trust schemes and the upfront fees. It really makes me wonder if there is a future for exchange of any type going forward or if we just need to buy where we want to go over and over and strictly rent anything else. Anyone else find it so unnerving?