But let me put this in big letters so that nobody misunderstands. BUYING A TIMESHARE IS NOT A FINANCIAL INVESTMENT.
Oh my goodness Jim, I'm surprised at these words. Every time that you plunk down your hard earned dollars on something, you are making an investment of some sort and consequences flow from that purchase decision. Granted, TS falls into a gray area, but it is indeed an investment in
destination travel. Folks should be very aware of this reality before they make any decision to jump into TS.
And TS does indeed behave like real estate while at the same time it does not behave like real estate as so many choose to argue here. So anyone pondering a purchase should indeed be aware of all of the nuances & characteristics of TS before making the decision to jump into the pool.
Bottom line is to do what works for you and you feel comfortable with.
The reason that the waters appear so muddy is because of what
tlwmkw suggests. It all boils down to individuals and what their world view and their personal goals in life are. In other words, destination travel is not an absolute thing precisely definied and organized into absolute principles. Yes, it is governmed by procedures, but it is also an
aesthetic which operates in a very real world where one should proceed cautiously. As the saying goes,
about facts I will argue emphatically, but of things aesthetic . . . there is little to be gained. This is why MVC works for so many different types of people. They can put their own spin and their own imprint on their ownership experience. You can be frugal or spendthrift, you can insist upon developer & MR points or you can take your stand on resale weeks. It's always an individual decision built upon the foundations of what TS is.
I prefer not to delve into issues of "lost opportunity cost" or "alternative investments", the MR Point ratio or any other absolutist maxims about what one should or should not do in TS. Other than standing by the maxim of
buyer beware I believe that the best we can do here on TUG is to lay out all of the possibilities and let the individual decide if the shoe fits or not.
Hey, I agree that in general, one should avoid MVC financing as better deals are usualy to be found elsewhere. But I would be wrong to suggest that Marriott financing should never be a choice -- our own personal experience attests this. Likewise I still suggest that an MVC developer purchase will indeed behave like a real estate investment for certain owners who pursue specific strategies of ownership. I'm not going to assail folks who feel otherwise, but I will indeed insist that there are MVC owners out there who have availed themselves of this situation or are in a positive equity position to do so. I'm not gonna say that this is a likely outcome that every owner can count on. That's why I point to relative costs of ownership as a more accurate measure of the wisdom of purchasing TS.
I still believe that you raise some good points about MVC. I do however want to caution anyone who is pondering a TS to see the big picture and figure out how/if you can wear the TS shoe. How you walk it is an individual choice. I myself am a combination of relativist, pragmatic-optimist, and a touch sentimentalist. The MVC shoe fits us well, though like others here, we've hit a bump or two along the way.
When I look back at the family vacations we have enjoyed, where we have traveled, and what it has cost us, I can only say that we remain very satisfied with our MVC ownership experience. And a big part of that satisfaction lies in
how we made it our own. I think that many owners agree with this aspect of MVC
safe & happy journeys to all
Barry