Carolinian
TUG Member
In this case, Google was notified of the slander and did nothing about it for two years. Their hide needs to be nailed to the wall for that.It'll be real interesting to see how this plays out in the courts, simply because Google isn't making the statements in some official capacity. Before you log in to all AI systems I've seen there are disclaimers that the information given may be mistaken or wholly made up. It's been argued and has so far lost in court that algorithms promoting engagement and ragebait also push more extreme positions as you click through more Youtube videos for instance. Somehow choosing the order and placement of showing you articles or information has been held to NOT make you a publisher so again, you're not liable for the algorithm.
The trickier thing about AI is how does it phrase the alleged slander will matter also, and because it's different for each prompt and time prompting, it's probably going to get into arguments about how the AI was prompted too. We know you can kind of "force" an AI to say some outlandish things based on bullying prompts. I won't say that is the case here, I have no idea. In some sense, this has turned into a Streisand effect. I only know about this because of the lawsuits and reporting.