comicbookman
TUG Member
Actually, you seem to be ignoring the fact that Wyndham is an OWNER. so what you are saying is that their desires don't count because they are corporate. That would seem to imply that your groups desires shoulndt count either because you act together and not as individual owners. It sounds like a double standard is in effect.That's completely misleading, because:
1. Wyndham corporate is the majority owner at each and every one of these resorts which is closing
2. Wyndham initiated this process. Not on behest of actual owners, but based on internal corporate desire to do so
All this messaging is very misleading because if you read the statement and take it on face value, one would assume a grass roots group of owners, not corporate interests, initiated this process.
The idea that a large group of owners are clamoring for FEWER vacation options is beyond insulting... this was purely a cost savings measure by Wyndham.
Some Wyndham defenders will say that when the owners voted on whether or not to go through with the bankruptcy, you will find that the vote of owners was overwhelming to move forward with this, some of those people just want out. But regardless, the vote was purely ceremonial/procedural. They already had the numbers.
EDIT: Not to imply I am happy about what is happening. I own at Glade Have been to BB and star island a couple of times and can't count the number of times I have been to PP and Skyline. on top of that we were considering lake lure this summer.
Last edited: