As an owner I would be in favor of changing the Hyatt management at HSH. We bought at HSH to use very year, not to trade points. (For those who do not know, it is reported in this forum that the occupancy level at HSH is very high, very difficult to reserve via points. mostly owned weeks)
My negatives:
1) Owning a deeded lockout, club rules do not allow splitting your week into two reservation separate reservations. Per the club rules the owner has to reserve one side and deposit the other into the pool, and hope that you can get the week which you deposited back.
2) The management fees/HRC are high in my opinion. The front line people at HSH do a good job, no complaints. But the "Hyatt" hype is expensive. By this I mean who is actually paying for the salaries and printed marketing materials for those who push the brand...updates, benefits of HRC.
3) No option to opt out of Interval International...we don't use it.
4) Week ownership week transfer fees are excessive last experience was $650.00...for what? This is not for recording the deed at the county, this is to change the name in their system. I call it punitive.
6) If one purchases a week resale, you are penalized, devalued within HRC and the brand. Minor issue to me.
5) My perception of Hyatt AKA Marriott is that they are plotting, maneuvering to undermine the deeded week owners in favor of the expensive points systems. One way is ROFR.
So yes, I would be a yes.